659 research outputs found
Permission-Based Separation Logic for Multithreaded Java Programs
This paper presents a program logic for reasoning about multithreaded
Java-like programs with dynamic thread creation, thread joining and reentrant
object monitors. The logic is based on concurrent separation logic. It is the
first detailed adaptation of concurrent separation logic to a multithreaded
Java-like language. The program logic associates a unique static access
permission with each heap location, ensuring exclusive write accesses and
ruling out data races. Concurrent reads are supported through fractional
permissions. Permissions can be transferred between threads upon thread
starting, thread joining, initial monitor entrancies and final monitor exits.
In order to distinguish between initial monitor entrancies and monitor
reentrancies, auxiliary variables keep track of multisets of currently held
monitors. Data abstraction and behavioral subtyping are facilitated through
abstract predicates, which are also used to represent monitor invariants,
preconditions for thread starting and postconditions for thread joining.
Value-parametrized types allow to conveniently capture common strong global
invariants, like static object ownership relations. The program logic is
presented for a model language with Java-like classes and interfaces, the
soundness of the program logic is proven, and a number of illustrative examples
are presented
SPADE: Verification of Multithreaded Dynamic and Recursive Programs
International audienceThe tool SPADE allows to analyse automatically boolean programs with parallelism, communication between parallel processes, dynamic process creation, and recursion at the same time. As far as we know, this is the first software model checking tool based on an expressive model that accurately models all these aspects in programs
Static Application-Level Race Detection in STM Haskell using Contracts
Writing concurrent programs is a hard task, even when using high-level
synchronization primitives such as transactional memories together with a
functional language with well-controlled side-effects such as Haskell, because
the interferences generated by the processes to each other can occur at
different levels and in a very subtle way. The problem occurs when a thread
leaves or exposes the shared data in an inconsistent state with respect to the
application logic or the real meaning of the data. In this paper, we propose to
associate contracts to transactions and we define a program transformation that
makes it possible to extend static contract checking in the context of STM
Haskell. As a result, we are able to check statically that each transaction of
a STM Haskell program handles the shared data in a such way that a given
consistency property, expressed in the form of a user-defined boolean function,
is preserved. This ensures that bad interference will not occur during the
execution of the concurrent program.Comment: In Proceedings PLACES 2013, arXiv:1312.2218. [email protected];
[email protected]
Sequentializing Parameterized Programs
We exhibit assertion-preserving (reachability preserving) transformations
from parameterized concurrent shared-memory programs, under a k-round
scheduling of processes, to sequential programs. The salient feature of the
sequential program is that it tracks the local variables of only one thread at
any point, and uses only O(k) copies of shared variables (it does not use extra
counters, not even one counter to keep track of the number of threads).
Sequentialization is achieved using the concept of a linear interface that
captures the effect an unbounded block of processes have on the shared state in
a k-round schedule. Our transformation utilizes linear interfaces to
sequentialize the program, and to ensure the sequential program explores only
reachable states and preserves local invariants.Comment: In Proceedings FIT 2012, arXiv:1207.348
Resource Usage Protocols for Iterators
We discuss usage protocols for iterator objects that prevent concurrent modifications of the underlying collection while iterators are in progress. We formalize these protocols in Java-like object interfaces, enriched with separation logic contracts. We present examples of iterator clients and proofs that they adhere to the iterator protocol, as well as examples of iterator implementations and proofs that they implement the iterator interface
- âŠ