Verification of Randomized Security Protocols

We consider the problem of verifying the security of finitely many sessions of a protocol that tosses coins in addition to standard cryptographic primitives against a Dolev-Yao adversary. Two properties are investigated here --- \emph{secrecy}, which asks if no adversary interacting with a protocol $P$ can determine a secret \secret with probability $> 1-p$; and \emph{indistinguishability}, which asks if the probability observing any sequence \obseq in $P_1$ is the same as that of observing \obseq in $P_2$, under the same adversary. Both secrecy and indistinguishability are known to be \conp-complete for non-randomized protocols. In contrast, we show that, for randomized protocols, secrecy and indistinguishability are both decidable in \conexp. We also prove a matching lower bound for the secrecy problem by reducing the non-satisfiability problem of monadic first order logic without equality.Ope

Analysis of randomized security protocols

Formal analysis has a long and successful track record in the automated verification of security protocols. Techniques in this domain have converged around modeling protocols as non-deterministic processes that interact asynchronously through an adversarial environment controlled by a Dolev-Yao attacker. There are, however, a large class of protocols whose correctness relies on an explicit ability to model and reason about randomness. Lying at the heart of many widely adopted systems for anonymous communication, these protocols have so-far eluded automated verification techniques. The present work overcomes this long standing obstacle, providing the first framework analyzing randomized security protocols against Dolev-Yao attackers. In this formalism, we present algorithms for model checking safety and indistinguishability properties of randomized security protocols. Our techniques are implemented in the Stochastic Protocol ANalyzer (SPAN) and evaluated on a new suite of benchmarks. Our benchmark examples include a brand new class of protocols that have never been subject of formal (symbolic) verification, including: mix-networks, dinning cryptographers networks, and several electronic voting protocols. During our analysis, we uncover previously unknown vulnerabilities in two popular electronic voting protocols from the literature. The high overhead associated with verifying security protocols, in conjunction with the fact that protocols are rarely run in isolation, has created a demand for modular verification techniques. In our protocol analysis framework, we give a series of composition results for safety and indistinguishability properties of randomized security protocols. Finally, we study the model checking problem for the probabilistic objects that lie at the heart of our protocol semantics. In particular, we present a novel technique that allows for the precise verification of probabilistic computation tree logic (PCTL) properties of discrete time Markov chains (DTMCs) and Markov decision processes (MDPs) at scale. Although our motivation comes from protocol analysis, the techniques further verification capabilities in many application areas

Cryptographic Randomized Response Techniques

We develop cryptographically secure techniques to guarantee unconditional privacy for respondents to polls. Our constructions are efficient and practical, and are shown not to allow cheating respondents to affect the ``tally'' by more than their own vote -- which will be given the exact same weight as that of other respondents. We demonstrate solutions to this problem based on both traditional cryptographic techniques and quantum cryptography.Comment: 21 page

Secure Multiparty Computation with Partial Fairness

A protocol for computing a functionality is secure if an adversary in this protocol cannot cause more harm than in an ideal computation where parties give their inputs to a trusted party which returns the output of the functionality to all parties. In particular, in the ideal model such computation is fair -- all parties get the output. Cleve (STOC 1986) proved that, in general, fairness is not possible without an honest majority. To overcome this impossibility, Gordon and Katz (Eurocrypt 2010) suggested a relaxed definition -- 1/p-secure computation -- which guarantees partial fairness. For two parties, they construct 1/p-secure protocols for functionalities for which the size of either their domain or their range is polynomial (in the security parameter). Gordon and Katz ask whether their results can be extended to multiparty protocols. We study 1/p-secure protocols in the multiparty setting for general functionalities. Our main result is constructions of 1/p-secure protocols when the number of parties is constant provided that less than 2/3 of the parties are corrupt. Our protocols require that either (1) the functionality is deterministic and the size of the domain is polynomial (in the security parameter), or (2) the functionality can be randomized and the size of the range is polynomial. If the size of the domain is constant and the functionality is deterministic, then our protocol is efficient even when the number of parties is O(log log n) (where n is the security parameter). On the negative side, we show that when the number of parties is super-constant, 1/p-secure protocols are not possible when the size of the domain is polynomial