154 research outputs found

    Veridicity

    Get PDF
    This paper addresses the problem of assessing the veridicity of textual content. Has an event mentioned in the text really occurred? Who is the source of the information? What is the stance of the author of the text? Does the author indicate whether he believes the source? We will survey some of linguistic conventions that indicate the author\u27s commitment, or the lack thereof, to the propositions contained in her text. In particular we discuss phenomena that have been studied as presuppositions or conventional implicatures in previous literature. Some of those, such as factive and non-factive verbs, have received extensive attention in the past. Some others, such as supplemental expressions (e.g. appositives, parentheticals), have not received much previous attention, although they are very common and a rich source of textual inferences. A recent study by Christopher Potts classifies supplemental expressions as conventional implicatures. We agree with Potts on the label but not on what it means. In contrast to Potts, we claim that supplemental expressions cannot always be treated as the author\u27s direct commitments and argue that they do not constitute a basis for a distinction between presuppositions and conventional implicatures. We illustrate some cases of conventional implicature and show how they indicate an author\u27s commitment to the truth of his statements and briefly state the importance of these distinctions for Information Extraction (IE)

    05151 Abstracts Collection -- Annotating, Extracting and Reasoning about Time and Events

    Get PDF
    From 10.04.05 to 15.04.05, the Dagstuhl Seminar 05151 ``Annotating, Extracting and Reasoning about Time and Events\u27\u27 was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

    Role of Assumptions in Security Environment Analysis

    Get PDF
    In the Information Age, the information overload transfers the burden of informationbusiness from obtaining data and information to its selection and processing, in the effort to producestudies or intelligence useful for international relations management. The criterion for selectinginformation is its relevance for a specific analytical task. By information relevance one canunderstand the degree of association between certain information and the issue of interest, or themeasure that information matches the requirements for clearing the analytical problem. How can thisbe established? Of course, not directly, because there is no map of connections within information,although a key-word list or an index of terms might be available

    ๋ถ€์ • ์ผ์น˜์™€ ๋ฐ˜์ง„์‹ค์„ฑ์˜ ์ž์งˆ ๋ช…์„ธ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์–ธ์–ดํ•™๊ณผ, 2014. 8. ๊ณ ํฌ์ •.๋ถ€์ • ์กฐ์‘(Negative Concord)์€ ํ•œ ์ ˆ์—์„œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ถ€์ • ํ˜•ํƒœ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์š”์†Œ๋“ค์ด ๊ณต๋ชจํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜๋ฏธ์ƒ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋งŒ์˜ ๋ถ€์ •์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ ๋‚จ๋ถ€์—์„œ ์“ฐ์ด๋Š” ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋ฐฉ์–ธ(ESUS)์„ ๋น„๋กฏํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ณ„์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์–ธ์–ด์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋ชจ๋“  ์ œ์•ˆ์€ ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ถ€์ • ํ˜•ํƒœ์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ์˜๋ฏธ์—์„œ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋งŒ์˜ ๋ถ€์ •์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฌธ์ œ(Compositionality Problem)๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถˆ๋ฆฐ๋‹ค. ํ˜„์žฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ์ด ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์ˆ˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์ œ์•ˆ์ด ๋‚˜์™”๋‹ค. ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ๋“ค์€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ณด๋ฉด ํ•™์„ค์„ ์„ธ ๊ฐœ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆŒ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค: ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” n-word(๋ถ€์ • ํ˜•ํƒœ์†Œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๋ช…์‚ฌ)๊ฐ€ ์›๋ž˜ ๋ถ€์ • ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค๋Š” ํ•™์„ค์ด๋ฉฐ (e.g. Zanuttini (1991)), ๋˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” n-word ๊ฐ€ NPI ์ข…๋ฅ˜ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ณด๋Š” ํ•™์„ค์ด๋‹ค (e.g. Giannakidou (2000)). ์„ธ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ•™์„ค์€ ๋ถ€์ • ์กฐ์‘์ด Agree (Chomsky (1995, 2000, 2001))์— ์˜ํ•œ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ณธ๋‹ค (e.g. Zeijlstra (2004, 2008)). ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ด ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•™์„ค์˜ ๊ด€์ ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๋‹จ์ ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ์— ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ œ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ‘œ์ค€ ์˜์–ด์™€ ๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ ๋ถ€์ • ์กฐ์‘์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ์˜์–ด์˜ ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์–ธ(ESUS)์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํ•ด๋‹น ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋น„ํ•œ์ •์‚ฌ(indefinite)๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€์ • ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์ž(negative operator)์˜ c-command ์˜์—ญ์—์„œ๋Š” Agree ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด์„œ ๋ฐ˜์ง„์‹ค์„ฑ์˜ ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๋Š”๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ด ๋ฐฉ์–ธ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์—์„œ n-word ์™€ NPI ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ์ œ์•ˆ๋ณด๋‹ค๋„ ๋” ๊นŠ์€ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ ๋‹ค์Œ์— ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ์ด ์ œ์•ˆ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์–ธ์–ด์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋„ ๋” ์ž˜ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์ผ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿผ์œผ๋กœ์จ Romance ์–ด์˜ ๋ถ€์ • ์กฐ์‘์—์„œ ์ž์ฃผ ๋‹ค๋ค„์ง€๋Š” ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ํผ์ฆ์„ ์ž˜ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์ œ์•ˆ์˜ ์ฃผ์žฅ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” n-word ๊ฐ€ NPI ์™€ ์•„์ฃผ ๊นŠ์€ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฌธํ—Œ์—์„œ์˜ ๋‘˜์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค๋Š” ์ฃผ์žฅ๋“ค์„ ๋ฐ˜๋ฐ•ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฒ‰๋ณด๊ธฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋‘˜์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค๊ณ  ๋ณด์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ํ•œ์ธต ๋” ๊นŠ์ด ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋ฉด ์ด ๋ชจ๋“  ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๊ณ  ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜๋ ค๊ณ  ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ESUS ์˜ ์ด์ค‘ ๋ถ€์ •์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ค‘ ๋ถ€์ •์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค: ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์  ๋ฌธ์žฅ๋ถ€์ •ํ‘œ์ง€(sentential negative marker, e.g. not)์˜ ์‚ฝ์ž…์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋ฉฐ, ๋˜ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” n-word ๊ฐ€ focus ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ Rooth (1985, 1996)์˜ Alternative Semantics ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ณด๋ฉด focus ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๋Š” n-word ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ด์ค‘ ๋ถ€์ •์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ , ๋‹จ์ง€ ์–ด๋–ค ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ•œ์˜ ์š”์†Œ(์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ๋งํ•ด์„œ ๊ณต์ง‘ํ•ฉ)์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ถ€์ •์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ n-word ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ค ๋•Œ๋Š” ๋ถ€์ • ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋ฉฐ, ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋•Œ๋Š” ๋ถ€์ • ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ์ค‘์˜์„ฑ์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ฃผ์žฅํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ESUS ์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋น„๋กฏํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ธ๊ณ„์˜ ๋งŽ์€ ์–ธ์–ด์— ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๋ถ€์ • ์กฐ์‘์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋”๋Ÿฌ, ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ ์ œ์•ˆ์˜ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฌธ์ œ์ ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ•ด๋‹น ํ˜„์ƒ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์ ์ธ ๋ถ„์„(compositional analysis)์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค.Negative Concord is a linguistic phenomenon which can be described as the appearance of multiple negatively marked elements conspiring within a single clause to yield only a single semantic negation. Examples of this phenomenon are widely attested in languages as diverse as French (Mathieu (2001)) and Japanese (Watanabe (2004)). An example of the phenomenon from a non-Standard English would be Aint no one going to the store (= No one is going to the store). Any explanation of this phenomenon must account for what can be called a problem in compositionalityhow is it that despite multiple negative elements on the surface, there is only a single negation present in the semantics? Early attempts to account for this problem led to speculation on the nature of negatively-marked noun phrases (often called n-words), with some (e.g. Zanuttini (1991)) taking the view that n-words are universal negative quantifiers which absorb into each other through a process of negative factorization. Others (e.g. Giannakidou (2000)) took the opposite view, believing n-words to be inherently non-negative, and taking n-words to be a special type of NPI. More recently (e.g. Zeijlstra (2004, 2008)), some accounts have attempted to deal with compositionality through Agree. Using data from a non-Standard English which possesses Negative Concord, this thesis advances the idea that Negative Concord is the result of the valuation of indefinites placed under the scope of an anti-veridical (i.e. negative) operator. Furthermore, data from this dialect suggest that n-words and indefinite NPIs (e.g. anything) are more related than even previous accounts linking the two phenomena. In essence then, this thesis takes from the n-word as NPI approach and the Agree approach, but in a way that is unique to either approach. This thesis then extends the analysis to Czech and Spanish, and in doing so extends the empirical coverage of Agree proposals and naturally accounts for a long-standing puzzle in Romance Negative Concord in which sentential negative markers show fickle behavior. As this proposal unites n-words with indefinite NPIs, and asserts that differences the between forms are superficial and dependent upon (anti)veridical valuation, this thesis then explores the implications of this assertion by comparing n-words to indefinite nominal NPIs. By doing so, it is shown that standard assumptions about the supposed differences between n-words and nominal NPIs are actually superficial in nature and indicative of differences in the licensing domains rather than in the indefinites themselves, a welcome conclusion given the proposal. Finally, this thesis examines Double Negation in a Negative Concord variety of English, and shows the effects of focus on n-words. In presenting an analysis of Double Negation in terms of Alternative Semantics (Rooth (1985, 1996)), it is shown how some focused n-words seemingly can add supplemental negation to a clause and give the appearance of Double Negation, when non-focused n-words cannot. The idea is that focused n-words do not create true instances of Double Negation, rather they are the negation of the least member of a set of alternatives, or what is for all intents and purposes the empty set รธ. This proposal couched in terms of Alternative Semantics allows us to sidestep a potential reverse problem of compositionalitythat is, how is that focused n-words can add supplemental negation whereas non-focused n-words cannot? The take away is therefore a complete compositional analysis of Negative Concord constructions, which bears with it a favorable simplification in the lexicon by uniting n-words and indefinite NPIs, while managing to extend empirical coverage.1. Introduction 1 1.1 The phenomenon of Negative Concord 1.2 Cross-linguistic variation in Negative Concord 1.3 Aims of thesis 2. Previous Accounts of Negative Concord 2.1 Negative Concord as Negative Absorption 2.1.1 Basic proposal 2.1.2 Issues with the Negative Absorption account 2.2 N-words as special NPIs 2.2.1 Basic proposal 2.2.2 Issues with NPI analysis 2.3 An Agree-based approach to Negative Concord 2.3.1 Background 2.3.2 Application 2.3.3 Issues with Zeijlstras proposal 2.4 Conclusion 3. Analysis of Negative Concord in an English of the Southern US 3.1 Negative elements and NC in ESUS 3.2 Proposal 3.3 Distribution of n-words vs. any-type indefinites 3.4 Dummy negation 3.5 Conclusion 4. Extension to and Evidence from Other Languages 4.1 Czech โ€“ high negation NC language 4.2 A common puzzle from Negative Concord in Romance 4.3 Conclusion 5. Implications 5.1 Indefinite NPIs vs. N-words and the Almost Test: Penka (2006) 5.2 Underspecificity and the availability of indefinites as elliptical answers 5.3 Conclusion 6. Double Negation in ESUS 6.1 Insertion of addition [iNeg]-bearing elements 6.2 Focus of n-words and Double Negation 6.3 Identificational focus vs. information focus (Kiss (1998)) 6.4 Informational focus doesnt bring about DN per se 7. Conclusion Appendix: citations from examples References 71 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 78Maste

    THE ANALYSIS OF INFORMATICS SECURITY COSTS IN CITIZEN ORIENTED APPLICATIONS

    Get PDF
    The paper highlights the analysis of informatics security costs for the citizen oriented applications. The citizen oriented informatics applications are defined. The differences brought by these when compared with the traditional applications are described. Structures of citizen oriented informatics applications are presented. A few common citizen oriented applications are discussed. The special security requirements of the citizen oriented applications are discussed. Ways of increasing the security of the applications are given.security, cost, estimation, citizen orientation, distributed applications

    The weakness of must: In defense of a Mantra

    Get PDF
    Many semanticists have claimed that must's meaning is weaker than epistemic necessity, a claim that von Fintel & Gillies (2010) dub "The Mantr". Recently von Fintel & Gillies have argued in an influential paper that the Mantra is false, and that the intuitions that have driven it can be accounted for by appealing to evidential meaning. I show that von Fintel & Gillies do not provide a compelling argument against the Mantra, and that their theory of evidential meaning, while promising in certain respects, also has serious empirical and conceptual problems. In addition, a variety of corpus examples indicate that speakers who assert must p are not always maximally confident in the truth of p. As an alternative, I reimplement on Fintel & Gillies' theory of indirect evidentiality in a probabilistic, Mantra-compatible framework. Ultimately, both sides of the debate are partly right: must is weak in several respects, but it also encodes an indirect evidential meaning

    Infrared photometry of Young Massive Clusters in the starburst galaxy NGC 4214

    Full text link
    We present the results of an infrared photometric survey performed with NICS@TNG in the nearby starburst galaxy NGC 4214. We derived accurate integrated JK magnitudes of 10 young massive clusters and compared them with the already available Hubble Space Telescope ultraviolet colors. These clusters are located in the combined ultraviolet-infrared colors planes on well defined sequences, whose shapes allow a precise determination of their age. By means of the comparison with suitable stellar evolution models we estimated ages, metallicities, reddening and masses of these clusters. All the analyzed clusters appear to be younger than log(t/yr)<8.4, moderately metal-rich and slightly less massive than present-day Galactic globular clusters. The derived ages for clusters belonging to the secondary HII star forming complex are significantly larger than those previously estimated in the literature. We also discuss the possibility of using the ultraviolet-infrared color-color diagram to select candidate young massive clusters hosting multiple stellar populations.Comment: 12 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication by MNRA

    Two Reformulations of the Verificationist Thesis in Epistemic Temporal Logic that Avoid Fitchโ€™s Paradox

    Get PDF
    1) We will begin by offering a short introduction to Epistemic Logic and presenting Fitchโ€™s paradox in an epistemicโ€‘modal logic. (2) Then, we will proceed to presenting three Epistemic Temporal logical frameworks creatโ€‘ ed by Hoshi (2009)โ€Š: TPAL (Temporal Public Announcement Logic), TAPAL (Temporal Arbitrary Public Announcement Logic) and TPAL+Pโ€Š! (Temporal Public Announcement Logic with Labeled Past Operators). We will show how Hoshi stated the Verificationist Thesis in the language of TAPAL and analyze his argument on why this version of it is immune from paradox. (3) Edgington (1985) offered an interpretation of the Verificationist Thesis that blocks Fitchโ€™s paradox and we will propose a way to formulate it in a TAPALโ€‘based lanโ€‘ guage. The language we will use is a combination of TAPAL and TPAL+Pโ€Š! with an Indefinite (Unlabeled) Past Operator (TAPAL+Pโ€Š!+P). Using indexed satisfiโ€‘ ability relations (as introduced in (Wang 2010โ€Š; 2011)) we will offer a prospec โ€‘ tive semantics for this language. We will investigate whether the tentative reโ€‘ formulation of Edgingtonโ€™s Verificationist Thesis in TAPAL+Pโ€Š!+P is free from paradox and adequate to Edgingtonโ€™s ideas on how โ€žall truths are knowableโ€œ should be interpreted
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore