7,110 research outputs found
Model Checking Dynamic-Epistemic Spatial Logic
In this paper we focus on Dynamic Spatial Logic, the extension of Hennessy-Milner logic with the parallel operator. We develop a sound complete Hilbert-style axiomatic system for it comprehending the behavior of spatial operators in relation with dynamic/temporal ones. Underpining on a new congruence we define over the class of processes - the structural bisimulation - we prove the finite model property for this logic that provides the decidability for satisfiability, validity and model checking against process semantics. Eventualy we propose algorithms for validity, satisfiability and model checking
Characterizing the NP-PSPACE Gap in the Satisfiability Problem for Modal Logic
There has been a great of work on characterizing the complexity of the
satisfiability and validity problem for modal logics. In particular, Ladner
showed that the validity problem for all logics between K, T, and S4 is {\sl
PSPACE}-complete, while for S5 it is {\sl NP}-complete. We show that, in a
precise sense, it is \emph{negative introspection}, the axiom \neg K p \rimp K
\neg K p, that causes the gap. In a precise sense, if we require this axiom,
then the satisfiability problem is {\sl NP}-complete; without it, it is {\sl
PSPACE}-complete.Comment: 6 page
The Tree Width of Separation Logic with Recursive Definitions
Separation Logic is a widely used formalism for describing dynamically
allocated linked data structures, such as lists, trees, etc. The decidability
status of various fragments of the logic constitutes a long standing open
problem. Current results report on techniques to decide satisfiability and
validity of entailments for Separation Logic(s) over lists (possibly with
data). In this paper we establish a more general decidability result. We prove
that any Separation Logic formula using rather general recursively defined
predicates is decidable for satisfiability, and moreover, entailments between
such formulae are decidable for validity. These predicates are general enough
to define (doubly-) linked lists, trees, and structures more general than
trees, such as trees whose leaves are chained in a list. The decidability
proofs are by reduction to decidability of Monadic Second Order Logic on graphs
with bounded tree width.Comment: 30 pages, 2 figure
(Un)Decidability Results for Word Equations with Length and Regular Expression Constraints
We prove several decidability and undecidability results for the
satisfiability and validity problems for languages that can express solutions
to word equations with length constraints. The atomic formulas over this
language are equality over string terms (word equations), linear inequality
over the length function (length constraints), and membership in regular sets.
These questions are important in logic, program analysis, and formal
verification. Variants of these questions have been studied for many decades by
mathematicians. More recently, practical satisfiability procedures (aka SMT
solvers) for these formulas have become increasingly important in the context
of security analysis for string-manipulating programs such as web applications.
We prove three main theorems. First, we give a new proof of undecidability
for the validity problem for the set of sentences written as a forall-exists
quantifier alternation applied to positive word equations. A corollary of this
undecidability result is that this set is undecidable even with sentences with
at most two occurrences of a string variable. Second, we consider Boolean
combinations of quantifier-free formulas constructed out of word equations and
length constraints. We show that if word equations can be converted to a solved
form, a form relevant in practice, then the satisfiability problem for Boolean
combinations of word equations and length constraints is decidable. Third, we
show that the satisfiability problem for quantifier-free formulas over word
equations in regular solved form, length constraints, and the membership
predicate over regular expressions is also decidable.Comment: Invited Paper at ADDCT Workshop 2013 (co-located with CADE 2013
Complexity of Propositional Logics in Team Semantic
We classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability, validity, and model-checking problems for propositional independence, inclusion, and team logic. Our main result shows that the satisfiability and validity problems for propositional team logic are complete for alternating exponential-time with polynomially many alternations.Peer reviewe
Computabilities of Validity and Satisfiability in Probability Logics over Finite and Countable Models
The -logic (which is called E-logic in this paper) of
Kuyper and Terwijn is a variant of first order logic with the same syntax, in
which the models are equipped with probability measures and in which the
quantifier is interpreted as "there exists a set of measure
such that for each , ...." Previously, Kuyper and
Terwijn proved that the general satisfiability and validity problems for this
logic are, i) for rational , respectively
-complete and -hard, and ii) for ,
respectively decidable and -complete. The adjective "general" here
means "uniformly over all languages."
We extend these results in the scenario of finite models. In particular, we
show that the problems of satisfiability by and validity over finite models in
E-logic are, i) for rational , respectively
- and -complete, and ii) for , respectively
decidable and -complete. Although partial results toward the countable
case are also achieved, the computability of E-logic over countable
models still remains largely unsolved. In addition, most of the results, of
this paper and of Kuyper and Terwijn, do not apply to individual languages with
a finite number of unary predicates. Reducing this requirement continues to be
a major point of research.
On the positive side, we derive the decidability of the corresponding
problems for monadic relational languages --- equality- and function-free
languages with finitely many unary and zero other predicates. This result holds
for all three of the unrestricted, the countable, and the finite model cases.
Applications in computational learning theory, weighted graphs, and neural
networks are discussed in the context of these decidability and undecidability
results.Comment: 47 pages, 4 tables. Comments welcome. Fixed errors found by Rutger
Kuype
- …