Using Distributional Similarity of Multi-way Translations to Predict Multiword Expression Compositionality

We predict the compositionality of multi-word expressions using distributional sim-ilarity between each component word and the overall expression, based on transla-tions into multiple languages. We evaluate the method over English noun compounds, English verb particle constructions and German noun compounds. We show that the estimation of compositionality is im-proved when using translations into multi-ple languages, as compared to simply us-ing distributional similarity in the source language. We further find that string sim-ilarity complements distributional similar-ity. 1 Compositionality of MWEs Multiword expressions (hereafter MWEs) are combinations of words which are lexically, syntac-tically, semantically or statistically idiosyncratic (Sag et al., 2002; Baldwin and Kim, 2009). Much research has been carried out on the extraction and identification of MWEs1 in English (Schone an

A Bigger Fish to Fry:Scaling up the Automatic Understanding of Idiomatic Expressions

In this thesis, we are concerned with idiomatic expressions and how to handle them within NLP. Idiomatic expressions are a type of multiword phrase which have a meaning that is not a direct combination of the meaning of its parts, e.g. 'at a crossroads' and 'move the goalposts'.In Part I, we provide a general introduction to idiomatic expressions and an overview of observations regarding idioms based on corpus data. In addition, we discuss existing research on idioms from an NLP perspective, providing an overview of existing tasks, approaches, and datasets. In Part II, we focus on the building of a large idiom corpus, consisting of developing a system for the automatic extraction of potentially idiom expressions and building a large corpus of idiom using crowdsourced annotation. Finally, in Part III, we improve an existing unsupervised classifier and compare it to other existing classifiers. Given the relatively poor performance of this unsupervised classifier, we also develop a supervised deep neural network-based system and find that a model involving two separate modules looking at different information sources yields the best performance, surpassing previous state-of-the-art approaches.In conclusion, this work shows the feasibility of building a large corpus of sense-annotated potentially idiomatic expressions, and the benefits such a corpus provides for further research. It provides the possibility for quick testing of hypotheses about the distribution and usage of idioms, it enables the training of data-hungry machine learning methods for PIE disambiguation systems, and it permits fine-grained, reliable evaluation of such systems

Eesti keele ühendverbide automaattuvastus lingvistiliste ja statistiliste meetoditega

Tänapäeval on inimkeeli (kaasa arvatud eesti keelt) töötlevad tehnoloogiaseadmed igapäevaelu osa, kuid arvutite „keeleoskus“ pole kaugeltki täiuslik. Keele automaattöötluse kõige rohkem kasutust leidev rakendus on ilmselt masintõlge. Ikka ja jälle jagatakse sotsiaalmeedias, kuidas tuntud süsteemid (näiteks Google Translate) midagi valesti tõlgivad. Enamasti tekitavad absurdse olukorra mitmest sõnast koosnevad fraasid või laused. Näiteks ei suuda tõlkesüsteemid tabada lauses „Ta läks lepinguga alt“ ühendi alt minema tähendust petta saama, sest õige tähenduse edastamiseks ei saa selle ühendi komponente sõna-sõnalt tõlkida ja seetõttu satubki arvuti hätta. Selleks et nii masintõlkesüsteemide kui ka teiste kasulike rakenduste nagu libauudiste tuvastuse või küsimus-vastus süsteemide kvaliteet paraneks, on oluline, et arvuti oskaks tuvastada mitmesõnalisi üksuseid ja nende eri tähendusi, mida inimesed konteksti põhjal üpriski lihtalt teha suudavad. Püsiühendite (tähenduse) automaattuvastus on oluline kõikides keeltes ja on seetõttu pälvinud arvutilingvistikas rohkelt tähelepanu. Seega on eriti inglise keele põhjal välja pakutud terve hulk meetodeid, mida pole siiamaani eesti keele püsiühendite tuvastamiseks rakendatud. Doktoritöös kasutataksegi masinõppe meetodeid, mis on teiste keelte püsiühendite tuvastamisel edukad olnud, üht liiki eesti keele püsiühendi – ühendverbi – automaatseks tuvastamiseks. Töös demonstreeritakse suurte tekstiandmete põhjal, et seni eesti keele traditsioonilises käsitluses esitatud eesti keele ühendverbide jaotus ainukordseteks (ühendi komponentide koosesinemisel tekib uus tähendus) ja korrapärasteks (ühendi tähendus on tema komponentide summa) ei ole piisavalt põhjalik. Nimelt kinnitab töö arvutilingvistilistes uurimustes laialt levinud arusaama, et püsiühendid (k.a ühendverbid) jaotuvad skaalale, mille ühes otsas on ühendid, mille tähendus on selgelt komponentide tähenduste summa. ja teises need ühendid, mis saavad uue tähenduse. Uurimus näitab, et lisaks kontekstile aitavad arvutil tuvastada ühendverbi õiget tähendust mitmed teised tunnuseid, näiteks subjekti ja objekti elusus ja käänded. Doktoritöö raames valminud andmestikud ja vektoresitused on vajalikud uued ressursid, mis on avalikud edaspidisteks uurimusteks.Nowadays, applications that process human languages (including Estonian) are part of everyday life. However, computers are not yet able to understand every nuance of language. Machine translation is probably the most well-known application of natural language processing. Occasionally, the worst failures of machine translation systems (e.g. Google Translate) are shared on social media. Most of such cases happen when sequences longer than words are translated. For example, translation systems are not able to catch the correct meaning of the particle verb alt (‘from under’) minema (‘to go’) (‘to get deceived’) in the sentence Ta läks lepinguga alt because the literal translation of the components of the expression is not correct. In order to improve the quality of machine translation systems and other useful applications, e.g. spam detection or question answering systems, such (idiomatic) multi-word expressions and their meanings must be well detected. The detection of multi-word expressions and their meaning is important in all languages and therefore much research has been done in the field, especially in English. However, the suggested methods have not been applied to the detection of Estonian multi-word expressions before. The dissertation fills that gap and applies well-known machine learning methods to detect one type of Estonian multi-word expressions – the particle verbs. Based on large textual data, the thesis demonstrates that the traditional binary division of Estonian particle verbs to non-compositional (ainukordne, meaning is not predictable from the meaning of its components) and compositional (korrapärane, meaning is predictable from the meaning of its components) is not comprehensive enough. The research confirms the widely adopted view in computational linguistics that the multi-word expressions form a continuum between the compositional and non-compositional units. Moreover, it is shown that in addition to context, there are some linguistic features, e.g. the animacy and cases of subject and object that help computers to predict whether the meaning of a particle verb in a sentence is compositional or non-compositional. In addition, the research introduces novel resources for Estonian language – trained embeddings and created compositionality datasets are available for the future research.https://www.ester.ee/record=b5252157~S

Unsupervised Methods for Learning and Using Semantics of Natural Language

Teaching the computer to understand language is the major goal in the field of natural language processing. In this thesis we introduce computational methods that aim to extract language structure — e.g. grammar, semantics or syntax — from text, which provides the computer with information in order to understand language. During the last decades, scientific efforts and the increase of computational resources made it possible to come closer to the goal of understanding language. In order to extract language structure, many approaches train the computer on manually created resources. Most of these so-called supervised methods show high performance when applied to similar textual data. However, they perform inferior when operating on textual data, which are different to the one they are trained on. Whereas training the computer is essential to obtain reasonable structure from natural language, we want to avoid training the computer using manually created resources. In this thesis, we present so-called unsupervised methods, which are suited to learn patterns in order to extract structure from textual data directly. These patterns are learned with methods that extract the semantics (meanings) of words and phrases. In comparison to manually built knowledge bases, unsupervised methods are more flexible: they can extract structure from text of different languages or text domains (e.g. finance or medical texts), without requiring manually annotated structure. However, learning structure from text often faces sparsity issues. The reason for these phenomena is that in language many words occur only few times. If a word is seen only few times no precise information can be extracted from the text it occurs. Whereas sparsity issues cannot be solved completely, information about most words can be gained by using large amounts of data. In the first chapter, we briefly describe how computers can learn to understand language. Afterwards, we present the main contributions, list the publications this thesis is based on and give an overview of this thesis. Chapter 2 introduces the terminology used in this thesis and gives a background about natural language processing. Then, we characterize the linguistic theory on how humans understand language. Afterwards, we show how the underlying linguistic intuition can be operationalized for computers. Based on this operationalization, we introduce a formalism for representing words and their context. This formalism is used in the following chapters in order to compute similarities between words. In Chapter 3 we give a brief description of methods in the field of computational semantics, which are targeted to compute similarities between words. All these methods have in common that they extract a contextual representation for a word that is generated from text. Then, this representation is used to compute similarities between words. In addition, we also present examples of the word similarities that are computed with these methods. Segmenting text into its topically related units is intuitively performed by humans and helps to extract connections between words in text. We equip the computer with these abilities by introducing a text segmentation algorithm in Chapter 4. This algorithm is based on a statistical topic model, which learns to cluster words into topics solely on the basis of the text. Using the segmentation algorithm, we demonstrate the influence of the parameters provided by the topic model. In addition, our method yields state-of-the-art performances on two datasets. In order to represent the meaning of words, we use context information (e.g. neighboring words), which is utilized to compute similarities. Whereas we described methods for word similarity computations in Chapter 3, we introduce a generic symbolic framework in Chapter 5. As we follow a symbolic approach, we do not represent words using dense numeric vectors but we use symbols (e.g. neighboring words or syntactic dependency parses) directly. Such a representation is readable for humans and is preferred in sensitive applications like the medical domain, where the reason for decisions needs to be provided. This framework enables the processing of arbitrarily large data. Furthermore, it is able to compute the most similar words for all words within a text collection resulting in a distributional thesaurus. We show the influence of various parameters deployed in our framework and examine the impact of different corpora used for computing similarities. Performing computations based on various contextual representations, we obtain the best results when using syntactic dependencies between words within sentences. However, these syntactic dependencies are predicted using a supervised dependency parser, which is trained on language-dependent and human-annotated resources. To avoid such language-specific preprocessing for computing distributional thesauri, we investigate the replacement of language-dependent dependency parsers by language-independent unsupervised parsers in Chapter 6. Evaluating the syntactic dependencies from unsupervised and supervised parses against human-annotated resources reveals that the unsupervised methods are not capable to compete with the supervised ones. In this chapter we use the predicted structure of both types of parses as context representation in order to compute word similarities. Then, we evaluate the quality of the similarities, which provides an extrinsic evaluation setup for both unsupervised and supervised dependency parsers. In an evaluation on English text, similarities computed based on contextual representations generated with unsupervised parsers do not outperform the similarities computed with the context representation extracted from supervised parsers. However, we observe the best results when applying context retrieved by the unsupervised parser for computing distributional thesauri on German language. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our framework is capable to combine different context representations, as we obtain the best performance with a combination of both flavors of syntactic dependencies for both languages. Most languages are not composed of single-worded terms only, but also contain many multi-worded terms that form a unit, called multiword expressions. The identification of multiword expressions is particularly important for semantics, as e.g. the term New York has a different meaning than its single terms New or York. Whereas most research on semantics avoids handling these expressions, we target on the extraction of multiword expressions in Chapter 7. Most previously introduced methods rely on part-of-speech tags and apply a ranking function to rank term sequences according to their multiwordness. Here, we introduce a language-independent and knowledge-free ranking method that uses information from distributional thesauri. Performing evaluations on English and French textual data, our method achieves the best results in comparison to methods from the literature. In Chapter 8 we apply information from distributional thesauri as features for various applications. First, we introduce a general setting for tackling the out-of-vocabulary problem. This problem describes the inferior performance of supervised methods according to words that are not contained in the training data. We alleviate this issue by replacing these unseen words with the most similar ones that are known, extracted from a distributional thesaurus. Using a supervised part-of-speech tagging method, we show substantial improvements in the classification performance for out-of-vocabulary words based on German and English textual data. The second application introduces a system for replacing words within a sentence with a word of the same meaning. For this application, the information from a distributional thesaurus provides the highest-scoring features. In the last application, we introduce an algorithm that is capable to detect the different meanings of a word and groups them into coarse-grained categories, called supersenses. Generating features by means of supersenses and distributional thesauri yields an performance increase when plugged into a supervised system that recognized named entities (e.g. names, organizations or locations). Further directions for using distributional thesauri are presented in Chapter 9. First, we lay out a method, which is capable of incorporating background information (e.g. source of the text collection or sense information) into a distributional thesaurus. Furthermore, we describe an approach on building thesauri for different text domains (e.g. medical or finance domain) and how they can be combined to have a high coverage of domain-specific knowledge as well as a broad background for the open domain. In the last section we characterize yet another method, suited to enrich existing knowledge bases. All three directions might be further extensions, which induce further structure based on textual data. The last chapter gives a summary of this work: we demonstrate that without language-dependent knowledge, a computer can learn to extract useful structure from text by using computational semantics. Due to the unsupervised nature of the introduced methods, we are able to extract new structure from raw textual data. This is important especially for languages, for which less manually created resources are available as well as for special domains e.g. medical or finance. We have demonstrated that our methods achieve state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, we have proven their impact by applying the extracted structure in three natural language processing tasks. We have also applied the methods to different languages and large amounts of data. Thus, we have not proposed methods, which are suited for extracting structure for a single language, but methods that are capable to explore structure for “language” in general