7,643 research outputs found
Organizing for Higher Performance: Case Studies of Organized Delivery Systems
Offers lessons learned from healthcare delivery systems promoting the attributes of an ideal model as defined by the Fund: information continuity, care coordination and transitions, system accountability, teamwork, continuous innovation, and easy access
Drug-drug interactions in repeat prescriptions at village dispensaries (bereg) in Malta
Inappropriate treatments and drug-drug interactions
(DDIs) are known to occur in settings where repeat
prescriptions are issued. In view of this, a study was
carried out to document any such problematic drug
prescribing and propose changes that would enhance
patient safety. A random sample of 100 clients who requested
a repeat prescription at a group of peripheral village
dispensaries (bere©) in southern Malta was chosen and
following anonymisation, the drugs requested for such
prescriptions were entered into a database. A freely
available online DDI checker was used in the analysis
of the results and these were rechecked through the
appropriate section of the British National Formulary.
The resulting DDIs were then grouped according to type,
potential effect or disease for which the drugs were used. A total of 255 DDIs were detected in the prescriptions
of 53 clients. Drug combinations with a potential for
increased hypotensive effect were the most common
cause of DDIs (49.8%) in this sample, but other
categories of DDIs were found. These included DDIs
which could affect the management of diabetic patients
(27.3%), patients on psychiatric treatment (7%) and
anticoagulants (4.8%) as well as DDIs that affected serum
potassium levels (2.2%). The results obtained indicate that DDIs are common
at a number of peripheral village dispensaries in Malta,
and these could affect disease management in some
patients. Other DDIs can be potentially harmful.
Awareness, knowledge and vigilance by the prescribers
involved remains crucial to address the issues raised by DDIs. Suggestions for addressing these issues on an
administrative level are proposed.peer-reviewe
Performance Measures Using Electronic Health Records: Five Case Studies
Presents the experiences of five provider organizations in developing, testing, and implementing four types of electronic quality-of-care indicators based on EHR data. Discusses challenges, and compares results with those from traditional indicators
The New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation: Transforming a Public Safety Net Delivery System to Achieve Higher Performance
Describes the results of the public benefit corporation's improvement initiatives -- a common clinical information system for continuity, coordination on chronic disease management, teamwork and continuous innovation, and access to appropriate care
Annotated Bibliography: Understanding Ambulatory Care Practices in the Context of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement.
The ambulatory care setting is an increasingly important component of the patient safety conversation. Inpatient safety is the primary focus of the vast majority of safety research and interventions, but the ambulatory setting is actually where most medical care is administered. Recent attention has shifted toward examining ambulatory care in order to implement better health care quality and safety practices. This annotated bibliography was created to analyze and augment the current literature on ambulatory care practices with regard to patient safety and quality improvement. By providing a thorough examination of current practices, potential improvement strategies in ambulatory care health care settings can be suggested. A better understanding of the myriad factors that influence delivery of patient care will catalyze future health care system development and implementation in the ambulatory setting
Protocol for the 'e-Nudge trial' : a randomised controlled trial of electronic feedback to reduce the cardiovascular risk of individuals in general practice [ISRCTN64828380]
Background: Cardiovascular disease (including coronary heart disease and stroke) is a major
cause of death and disability in the United Kingdom, and is to a large extent preventable, by lifestyle
modification and drug therapy. The recent standardisation of electronic codes for cardiovascular
risk variables through the United Kingdom's new General Practice contract provides an
opportunity for the application of risk algorithms to identify high risk individuals. This randomised
controlled trial will test the benefits of an automated system of alert messages and practice
searches to identify those at highest risk of cardiovascular disease in primary care databases.
Design: Patients over 50 years old in practice databases will be randomised to the intervention
group that will receive the alert messages and searches, and a control group who will continue to
receive usual care. In addition to those at high estimated risk, potentially high risk patients will be
identified who have insufficient data to allow a risk estimate to be made. Further groups identified
will be those with possible undiagnosed diabetes, based either on elevated past recorded blood
glucose measurements, or an absence of recent blood glucose measurement in those with
established cardiovascular disease.
Outcome measures: The intervention will be applied for two years, and outcome data will be
collected for a further year. The primary outcome measure will be the annual rate of cardiovascular
events in the intervention and control arms of the study. Secondary measures include the
proportion of patients at high estimated cardiovascular risk, the proportion of patients with missing
data for a risk estimate, and the proportion with undefined diabetes status at the end of the trial
Development and Implementation of a Computer-Generated Reminder System for Diabetes Preventive Care
Conference PaperBiomedical Informatic
Recommended from our members
Measuring agreement between decision support reminders: the cloud vs. the local expert
Background: A cloud-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) was implemented to remotely provide evidence-based guideline reminders in support of preventative health. Following implementation, we measured the agreement between preventive care reminders generated by an existing, local CDSS and the new, cloud-based CDSS operating on the same patient visit data. Methods: Electronic health record data for the same set of patients seen in primary care were sent to both the cloud-based web service and local CDSS. The clinical reminders returned by both services were captured for analysis. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was calculated to compare the two sets of reminders. Kappa statistics were further adjusted for prevalence and bias due to the potential effects of bias in the CDS logic and prevalence in the relative small sample of patients. Results: The cloud-based CDSS generated 965 clinical reminders for 405 patient visits over 3 months. The local CDSS returned 889 reminders for the same patient visit data. When adjusted for prevalence and bias, observed agreement varied by reminder from 0.33 (95% CI 0.24 – 0.42) to 0.99 (95% CI 0.97 – 1.00) and demonstrated almost perfect agreement for 7 of the 11 reminders. Conclusions: Preventive care reminders delivered by two disparate CDS systems show substantial agreement. Subtle differences in rule logic and terminology mapping appear to account for much of the discordance. Cloud-based CDSS therefore show promise, opening the door for future development and implementation in support of health care providers with limited resources for knowledge management of complex logic and rules
Recommended from our members
The impact of diabetes nurse care managers in outlying medical offices on quality of care: An empirical investigation
The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Diabetes Nurse Care Manager on an at-risk diabetic population using a Primary Group Visit Model in Outlying Medical Offices within the Kaiser-Permanente Health Care System upon the process and outcome of care in this population
Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The use of computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) may improve chronic disease management, which requires recurrent visits to multiple health professionals, ongoing disease and treatment monitoring, and patient behavior modification. The objective of this review was to determine if CCDSSs improve the processes of chronic care (such as diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease) and associated patient outcomes (such as effects on biomarkers and clinical exacerbations).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid's EBM Reviews database, Inspec, and reference lists for potentially eligible articles published up to January 2010. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the use of CCDSSs to usual practice or non-CCDSS controls. Trials were eligible if at least one component of the CCDSS was designed to support chronic disease management. We considered studies 'positive' if they showed a statistically significant improvement in at least 50% of relevant outcomes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 55 included trials, 87% (n = 48) measured system impact on the process of care and 52% (n = 25) of those demonstrated statistically significant improvements. Sixty-five percent (36/55) of trials measured impact on, typically, non-major (surrogate) patient outcomes, and 31% (n = 11) of those demonstrated benefits. Factors of interest to decision makers, such as cost, user satisfaction, system interface and feature sets, unique design and deployment characteristics, and effects on user workflow were rarely investigated or reported.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A small majority (just over half) of CCDSSs improved care processes in chronic disease management and some improved patient health. Policy makers, healthcare administrators, and practitioners should be aware that the evidence of CCDSS effectiveness is limited, especially with respect to the small number and size of studies measuring patient outcomes.</p
- …