576 research outputs found
Updating Probabilities
We show that Skilling's method of induction leads to a unique general theory
of inductive inference, the method of Maximum relative Entropy (ME). The main
tool for updating probabilities is the logarithmic relative entropy; other
entropies such as those of Renyi or Tsallis are ruled out. We also show that
Bayes updating is a special case of ME updating and thus, that the two are
completely compatible.Comment: Presented at MaxEnt 2006, the 26th International Workshop on Bayesian
Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods (July 8-13, 2006, Paris, France
Updating Probabilities with Data and Moments
We use the method of Maximum (relative) Entropy to process information in the
form of observed data and moment constraints. The generic "canonical" form of
the posterior distribution for the problem of simultaneous updating with data
and moments is obtained. We discuss the general problem of non-commuting
constraints, when they should be processed sequentially and when
simultaneously. As an illustration, the multinomial example of die tosses is
solved in detail for two superficially similar but actually very different
problems.Comment: Presented at the 27th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference
and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, Saratoga Springs, NY,
July 8-13, 2007. 10 pages, 1 figure V2 has a small typo in the end of the
appendix that was fixed. aj=mj+1 is now aj=m(k-j)+
Updating beliefs with incomplete observations
Currently, there is renewed interest in the problem, raised by Shafer in
1985, of updating probabilities when observations are incomplete. This is a
fundamental problem in general, and of particular interest for Bayesian
networks. Recently, Grunwald and Halpern have shown that commonly used updating
strategies fail in this case, except under very special assumptions. In this
paper we propose a new method for updating probabilities with incomplete
observations. Our approach is deliberately conservative: we make no assumptions
about the so-called incompleteness mechanism that associates complete with
incomplete observations. We model our ignorance about this mechanism by a
vacuous lower prevision, a tool from the theory of imprecise probabilities, and
we use only coherence arguments to turn prior into posterior probabilities. In
general, this new approach to updating produces lower and upper posterior
probabilities and expectations, as well as partially determinate decisions.
This is a logical consequence of the existing ignorance about the
incompleteness mechanism. We apply the new approach to the problem of
classification of new evidence in probabilistic expert systems, where it leads
to a new, so-called conservative updating rule. In the special case of Bayesian
networks constructed using expert knowledge, we provide an exact algorithm for
classification based on our updating rule, which has linear-time complexity for
a class of networks wider than polytrees. This result is then extended to the
more general framework of credal networks, where computations are often much
harder than with Bayesian nets. Using an example, we show that our rule appears
to provide a solid basis for reliable updating with incomplete observations,
when no strong assumptions about the incompleteness mechanism are justified.Comment: Replaced with extended versio
Cognitive Abilities and Behavioral Biases
We use a simple, three-item test for cognitive abilities to investigate whether established behavioral biases that play a prominent role in behavioral economics and finance are related to cognitive abilities. We find that higher test scores on the Cognitive Reflection Test of Frederick (2005) indeed are correlated with lower incidences of the conjunction fallacy, conservatism in updating probabilities, and overconfidence. Test scores are also significantly related to subjects' time and risk preferences. We find no influence on anchoring. However, even if biases are lower for people with higher cognitive abilities, they still remain substantial.
Keeping Up-to-Date with Bayes (Abstract)
Bayes’ theorem, a rule for updating probabilities as new information is obtained, may be over two centuries old but it has been the driving force behind many of the most significant recent advances in statistics and other sciences
Cognitive Abilities and Behavioral Biases
We use a simple, three-item test for cognitive abilities to investigate whether established behavioral biases that play a prominent role in behavioral economics and finance are related to cognitive abilities. We find that higher test scores on the Cognitive Reflection Test of Frederick (2005) indeed are correlated with lower incidences of the conjunction fallacy, conservatism in updating probabilities, and overconfidence. Test scores are also significantly related to subjects’ time and risk preferences. We find no influence on anchoring. However, even if biases are lower for people with higher cognitive abilities, they still remain substantial.cognitive reflection test, behavioral finance, biases, cognitive abilities
- …