Hashing based Answer Selection

Answer selection is an important subtask of question answering (QA), where deep models usually achieve better performance. Most deep models adopt question-answer interaction mechanisms, such as attention, to get vector representations for answers. When these interaction based deep models are deployed for online prediction, the representations of all answers need to be recalculated for each question. This procedure is time-consuming for deep models with complex encoders like BERT which usually have better accuracy than simple encoders. One possible solution is to store the matrix representation (encoder output) of each answer in memory to avoid recalculation. But this will bring large memory cost. In this paper, we propose a novel method, called hashing based answer selection (HAS), to tackle this problem. HAS adopts a hashing strategy to learn a binary matrix representation for each answer, which can dramatically reduce the memory cost for storing the matrix representations of answers. Hence, HAS can adopt complex encoders like BERT in the model, but the online prediction of HAS is still fast with a low memory cost. Experimental results on three popular answer selection datasets show that HAS can outperform existing models to achieve state-of-the-art performance

Unsupervised, Efficient and Semantic Expertise Retrieval

We introduce an unsupervised discriminative model for the task of retrieving experts in online document collections. We exclusively employ textual evidence and avoid explicit feature engineering by learning distributed word representations in an unsupervised way. We compare our model to state-of-the-art unsupervised statistical vector space and probabilistic generative approaches. Our proposed log-linear model achieves the retrieval performance levels of state-of-the-art document-centric methods with the low inference cost of so-called profile-centric approaches. It yields a statistically significant improved ranking over vector space and generative models in most cases, matching the performance of supervised methods on various benchmarks. That is, by using solely text we can do as well as methods that work with external evidence and/or relevance feedback. A contrastive analysis of rankings produced by discriminative and generative approaches shows that they have complementary strengths due to the ability of the unsupervised discriminative model to perform semantic matching.Comment: WWW2016, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. 201

ANSWER SIMILARITY GROUPING AND DIVERSIFICATION IN QUESTION ANSWERING SYSTEMS

The rise in popularity of mobile and voice search has led to a shift in IR from document to passage retrieval for non-factoid questions. Various datasets such as MSMarco, as well as efficient retrieval models have been developed to identify single best answer passages for this task. However, such models do not specifically address questions which could have multiple or alternative answers. In this dissertation, we focus on this new research area that involves studying answer passage relationships and how this could be applied to passage retrieval tasks. We first create a high quality dataset for the answer passage similarity task in the context of question answering. Manual annotation of passage pairs is performed to set the similarity labels, from which answer group information is automatically generated. We next investigate different types of representations, which could be used to create effective clusters. We experiment with various unsupervised representations and show that distributional representations outperform term based representations for this task. Next, weak supervision is leveraged to further improve the cluster modeling performance. We use BERT as the underlying model for training and show the relative performance of various weak signals such as GloVe and term-based Language Modeling for this task. In order to apply these clusters to the answer passage retrieval task for multi-answer questions, we use a modified version of the Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) diversification model. We demonstrate that answers retrieved using this model are more diverse i.e, cover more answer types with low redundancy as well as maximize relevance, with respect to the baselines. So far, we used passage clustering as a means to identify answer groups corresponding to a question and apply them in a question answering task. We extend this a step further by looking at related questions within a conversation. For this purpose, we expand the definition of Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) and use this to identify pertinent history passages for such questions. Updated question rewrites generated using these passages are then used to improve the conversational search task. In addition to being the first work that looks at answer relationships, our specific contributions can be summarized as follows: (1) Creation of new datasets with passage similarity and answer type information; (2) Effective passage similarity clustering models using unsupervised representations and weak supervision methods; (3) Applying the passage similarity/clustering information to diversification framework; (4) Identifying good response history candidates using answer passage clustering for the conversational search task

Cross-language Information Retrieval

Two key assumptions shape the usual view of ranked retrieval: (1) that the searcher can choose words for their query that might appear in the documents that they wish to see, and (2) that ranking retrieved documents will suffice because the searcher will be able to recognize those which they wished to find. When the documents to be searched are in a language not known by the searcher, neither assumption is true. In such cases, Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) is needed. This chapter reviews the state of the art for CLIR and outlines some open research questions.Comment: 49 pages, 0 figure

Look before you Hop: Conversational Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs Using Judicious Context Expansion

Fact-centric information needs are rarely one-shot; users typically ask follow-up questions to explore a topic. In such a conversational setting, the user's inputs are often incomplete, with entities or predicates left out, and ungrammatical phrases. This poses a huge challenge to question answering (QA) systems that typically rely on cues in full-fledged interrogative sentences. As a solution, we develop CONVEX: an unsupervised method that can answer incomplete questions over a knowledge graph (KG) by maintaining conversation context using entities and predicates seen so far and automatically inferring missing or ambiguous pieces for follow-up questions. The core of our method is a graph exploration algorithm that judiciously expands a frontier to find candidate answers for the current question. To evaluate CONVEX, we release ConvQuestions, a crowdsourced benchmark with 11,200 distinct conversations from five different domains. We show that CONVEX: (i) adds conversational support to any stand-alone QA system, and (ii) outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and question completion strategies