2,218 research outputs found
Approximate Hypergraph Coloring under Low-discrepancy and Related Promises
A hypergraph is said to be -colorable if its vertices can be colored
with colors so that no hyperedge is monochromatic. -colorability is a
fundamental property (called Property B) of hypergraphs and is extensively
studied in combinatorics. Algorithmically, however, given a -colorable
-uniform hypergraph, it is NP-hard to find a -coloring miscoloring fewer
than a fraction of hyperedges (which is achieved by a random
-coloring), and the best algorithms to color the hypergraph properly require
colors, approaching the trivial bound of as
increases.
In this work, we study the complexity of approximate hypergraph coloring, for
both the maximization (finding a -coloring with fewest miscolored edges) and
minimization (finding a proper coloring using fewest number of colors)
versions, when the input hypergraph is promised to have the following stronger
properties than -colorability:
(A) Low-discrepancy: If the hypergraph has discrepancy ,
we give an algorithm to color the it with colors.
However, for the maximization version, we prove NP-hardness of finding a
-coloring miscoloring a smaller than (resp. )
fraction of the hyperedges when (resp. ). Assuming
the UGC, we improve the latter hardness factor to for almost
discrepancy- hypergraphs.
(B) Rainbow colorability: If the hypergraph has a -coloring such
that each hyperedge is polychromatic with all these colors, we give a
-coloring algorithm that miscolors at most of the
hyperedges when , and complement this with a matching UG
hardness result showing that when , it is hard to even beat the
bound achieved by a random coloring.Comment: Approx 201
Rainbow Coloring Hardness via Low Sensitivity Polymorphisms
A k-uniform hypergraph is said to be r-rainbow colorable if there is an r-coloring of its vertices such that every hyperedge intersects all r color classes. Given as input such a hypergraph, finding a r-rainbow coloring of it is NP-hard for all k >= 3 and r >= 2. Therefore, one settles for finding a rainbow coloring with fewer colors (which is an easier task). When r=k (the maximum possible value), i.e., the hypergraph is k-partite, one can efficiently 2-rainbow color the hypergraph, i.e., 2-color its vertices so that there are no monochromatic edges. In this work we consider the next smaller value of r=k-1, and prove that in this case it is NP-hard to rainbow color the hypergraph with q := ceil[(k-2)/2] colors. In particular, for k <=6, it is NP-hard to 2-color (k-1)-rainbow colorable k-uniform hypergraphs.
Our proof follows the algebraic approach to promise constraint satisfaction problems. It proceeds by characterizing the polymorphisms associated with the approximate rainbow coloring problem, which are rainbow colorings of some product hypergraphs on vertex set [r]^n. We prove that any such polymorphism f: [r]^n -> [q] must be C-fixing, i.e., there is a small subset S of C coordinates and a setting a in [q]^S such that fixing x_{|S} = a determines the value of f(x). The key step in our proof is bounding the sensitivity of certain rainbow colorings, thereby arguing that they must be juntas. Armed with the C-fixing characterization, our NP-hardness is obtained via a reduction from smooth Label Cover
Bounded colorings of multipartite graphs and hypergraphs
Let be an edge-coloring of the complete -vertex graph . The
problem of finding properly colored and rainbow Hamilton cycles in was
initiated in 1976 by Bollob\'as and Erd\H os and has been extensively studied
since then. Recently it was extended to the hypergraph setting by Dudek, Frieze
and Ruci\'nski. We generalize these results, giving sufficient local (resp.
global) restrictions on the colorings which guarantee a properly colored (resp.
rainbow) copy of a given hypergraph .
We also study multipartite analogues of these questions. We give (up to a
constant factor) optimal sufficient conditions for a coloring of the
complete balanced -partite graph to contain a properly colored or rainbow
copy of a given graph with maximum degree . Our bounds exhibit a
surprising transition in the rate of growth, showing that the problem is
fundamentally different in the regimes and Our
main tool is the framework of Lu and Sz\'ekely for the space of random
bijections, which we extend to product spaces
- β¦