19 research outputs found
Definable isomorphism problem
We investigate the isomorphism problem in the setting of definable sets
(equivalent to sets with atoms): given two definable relational structures, are
they related by a definable isomorphism? Under mild assumptions on the
underlying structure of atoms, we prove decidability of the problem. The core
result is parameter-elimination: existence of an isomorphism definable with
parameters implies existence of an isomorphism definable without parameters
Limitations of Algebraic Approaches to Graph Isomorphism Testing
We investigate the power of graph isomorphism algorithms based on algebraic
reasoning techniques like Gr\"obner basis computation. The idea of these
algorithms is to encode two graphs into a system of equations that are
satisfiable if and only if if the graphs are isomorphic, and then to (try to)
decide satisfiability of the system using, for example, the Gr\"obner basis
algorithm. In some cases this can be done in polynomial time, in particular, if
the equations admit a bounded degree refutation in an algebraic proof systems
such as Nullstellensatz or polynomial calculus. We prove linear lower bounds on
the polynomial calculus degree over all fields of characteristic different from
2 and also linear lower bounds for the degree of Positivstellensatz calculus
derivations.
We compare this approach to recently studied linear and semidefinite
programming approaches to isomorphism testing, which are known to be related to
the combinatorial Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm. We exactly characterise the
power of the Weisfeiler-Lehman algorithm in terms of an algebraic proof system
that lies between degree-k Nullstellensatz and degree-k polynomial calculus
Coinduction up to in a fibrational setting
Bisimulation up-to enhances the coinductive proof method for bisimilarity,
providing efficient proof techniques for checking properties of different kinds
of systems. We prove the soundness of such techniques in a fibrational setting,
building on the seminal work of Hermida and Jacobs. This allows us to
systematically obtain up-to techniques not only for bisimilarity but for a
large class of coinductive predicates modelled as coalgebras. By tuning the
parameters of our framework, we obtain novel techniques for unary predicates
and nominal automata, a variant of the GSOS rule format for similarity, and a
new categorical treatment of weak bisimilarity
History-Register Automata
Programs with dynamic allocation are able to create and use an unbounded
number of fresh resources, such as references, objects, files, etc. We propose
History-Register Automata (HRA), a new automata-theoretic formalism for
modelling such programs. HRAs extend the expressiveness of previous approaches
and bring us to the limits of decidability for reachability checks. The
distinctive feature of our machines is their use of unbounded memory sets
(histories) where input symbols can be selectively stored and compared with
symbols to follow. In addition, stored symbols can be consumed or deleted by
reset. We show that the combination of consumption and reset capabilities
renders the automata powerful enough to imitate counter machines, and yields
closure under all regular operations apart from complementation. We moreover
examine weaker notions of HRAs which strike different balances between
expressiveness and effectiveness.Comment: LMCS (improved version of FoSSaCS
Recommended from our members
Nominal techniques
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Association for Computing Machinery via http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2893582.2893594
Programming languages abound with features making use of names in various ways. There is a mathematical foundation for the semantics of such features which uses groups of permutations of names and the notion of the
support
of an object with respect to the action of such a group. The relevance of this kind of mathematics for the semantics of names is perhaps not immediately obvious. That it is relevant and useful has emerged over the last 15 years or so in a body of work that has acquired its own name:
nominal techniques.
At the same time, the application of these techniques has broadened from semantics to computation theory in general. This article introduces the subject and is based upon a tutorial at LICS-ICALP 2015 [Pitts 2015a].
</jats:p
Generalized Multisets: From ZF to FSM
We study generalized multisets (multisets that allow possible negative multiplicities) both in the Zermelo-Fraenkel framework and in the finitely supported mathematics. We extend the notion of generalized multiset over a finite alphabet, and we replace it by the notion of algebraically finitely supported generalized multiset over a possibly infinite alphabet. We analyze the correspondence between some properties of generalized multisets obtained in finitely supported mathematics where only finitely supported objects are allowed, and those obtained in the classical Zermelo-Fraenkel framework
Automata theory in nominal sets
We study languages over infinite alphabets equipped with some structure that
can be tested by recognizing automata. We develop a framework for studying such
alphabets and the ensuing automata theory, where the key role is played by an
automorphism group of the alphabet. In the process, we generalize nominal sets
due to Gabbay and Pitts