2,491 research outputs found

    Qutrit witness from the Grothendieck constant of order four

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we prove that KG(3)<KG(4)K_G(3)<K_G(4), where KG(d)K_G(d) denotes the Grothendieck constant of order dd. To this end, we use a branch-and-bound algorithm commonly used in the solution of NP-hard problems. It has recently been proven that KG(3)1.4644K_G(3)\le 1.4644. Here we prove that KG(4)1.4841K_G(4)\ge 1.4841, which has implications for device-independent witnessing dimensions greater than two. Furthermore, the algorithm with some modifications may find applications in various black-box quantum information tasks with large number of inputs and outputs.Comment: 13 pages, 2 figure

    The positive semidefinite Grothendieck problem with rank constraint

    Full text link
    Given a positive integer n and a positive semidefinite matrix A = (A_{ij}) of size m x m, the positive semidefinite Grothendieck problem with rank-n-constraint (SDP_n) is maximize \sum_{i=1}^m \sum_{j=1}^m A_{ij} x_i \cdot x_j, where x_1, ..., x_m \in S^{n-1}. In this paper we design a polynomial time approximation algorithm for SDP_n achieving an approximation ratio of \gamma(n) = \frac{2}{n}(\frac{\Gamma((n+1)/2)}{\Gamma(n/2)})^2 = 1 - \Theta(1/n). We show that under the assumption of the unique games conjecture the achieved approximation ratio is optimal: There is no polynomial time algorithm which approximates SDP_n with a ratio greater than \gamma(n). We improve the approximation ratio of the best known polynomial time algorithm for SDP_1 from 2/\pi to 2/(\pi\gamma(m)) = 2/\pi + \Theta(1/m), and we show a tighter approximation ratio for SDP_n when A is the Laplacian matrix of a graph with nonnegative edge weights.Comment: (v3) to appear in Proceedings of the 37th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, 12 page

    Grothendieck inequalities for semidefinite programs with rank constraint

    Get PDF
    Grothendieck inequalities are fundamental inequalities which are frequently used in many areas of mathematics and computer science. They can be interpreted as upper bounds for the integrality gap between two optimization problems: a difficult semidefinite program with rank-1 constraint and its easy semidefinite relaxation where the rank constrained is dropped. For instance, the integrality gap of the Goemans-Williamson approximation algorithm for MAX CUT can be seen as a Grothendieck inequality. In this paper we consider Grothendieck inequalities for ranks greater than 1 and we give two applications: approximating ground states in the n-vector model in statistical mechanics and XOR games in quantum information theory.Comment: 22 page

    Better local hidden variable models for two-qubit Werner states and an upper bound on the Grothendieck constant KG(3)K_G(3)

    Full text link
    We consider the problem of reproducing the correlations obtained by arbitrary local projective measurements on the two-qubit Werner state ρ=vψ><ψ+(1v)14\rho = v |\psi_- > <\psi_- | + (1- v ) \frac{1}{4} via a local hidden variable (LHV) model, where ψ>|\psi_- > denotes the singlet state. We show analytically that these correlations are local for v=999×689×106 v = 999\times689\times{10^{-6}} cos4(π/50)0.6829\cos^4(\pi/50) \simeq 0.6829. In turn, as this problem is closely related to a purely mathematical one formulated by Grothendieck, our result implies a new bound on the Grothendieck constant KG(3)1/v1.4644K_G(3) \leq 1/v \simeq 1.4644. We also present a LHV model for reproducing the statistics of arbitrary POVMs on the Werner state for v0.4553v \simeq 0.4553. The techniques we develop can be adapted to construct LHV models for other entangled states, as well as bounding other Grothendieck constants.Comment: 12 pages, typos correcte
    corecore