6,250 research outputs found
A framework for security requirements engineering
This paper presents a framework for security requirements
elicitation and analysis, based upon the construction of a context for the system and satisfaction arguments for the security of the system. One starts with enumeration of security goals based on assets in the system. These goals are used to derive security requirements in the form of constraints. The system context is described using a problem-centered notation, then this context is
validated against the security requirements through construction of a satisfaction argument. The satisfaction argument is in two parts: a formal argument that the system can meet its security requirements, and a structured informal argument supporting the assumptions expressed in the formal argument. The construction
of the satisfaction argument may fail, revealing either that the security requirement cannot be satisfied in the context, or that the context does not contain sufficient information to develop the argument. In this case, designers and architects are asked to provide additional design information to resolve the problems
Real-time human ambulation, activity, and physiological monitoring:taxonomy of issues, techniques, applications, challenges and limitations
Automated methods of real-time, unobtrusive, human ambulation, activity, and wellness monitoring and data analysis using various algorithmic techniques have been subjects of intense research. The general aim is to devise effective means of addressing the demands of assisted living, rehabilitation, and clinical observation and assessment through sensor-based monitoring. The research studies have resulted in a large amount of literature. This paper presents a holistic articulation of the research studies and offers comprehensive insights along four main axes: distribution of existing studies; monitoring device framework and sensor types; data collection, processing and analysis; and applications, limitations and challenges. The aim is to present a systematic and most complete study of literature in the area in order to identify research gaps and prioritize future research directions
Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering
Responsible AI is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific
challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of AI. Recently, a
number of AI ethics principles frameworks have been published. However, without
further guidance on best practices, practitioners are left with nothing much
beyond truisms. Also, significant efforts have been placed at algorithm-level
rather than system-level, mainly focusing on a subset of mathematics-amenable
ethical principles, such as fairness. Nevertheless, ethical issues can arise at
any step of the development lifecycle, cutting across many AI and non-AI
components of systems beyond AI algorithms and models. To operationalize
responsible AI from a system perspective, in this paper, we present a
Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal
Literature Review (MLR). Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm
level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in
practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the
entire governance and engineering lifecycle. The Responsible AI Pattern
Catalogue classifies the patterns into three groups: multi-level governance
patterns, trustworthy process patterns, and responsible-AI-by-design product
patterns. These patterns provide systematic and actionable guidance for
stakeholders to implement responsible AI
Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulation
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) is based on seven technical
requirements sustained over three main pillars that should be met throughout
the system's entire life cycle: it should be (1) lawful, (2) ethical, and (3)
robust, both from a technical and a social perspective. However, attaining
truly trustworthy AI concerns a wider vision that comprises the trustworthiness
of all processes and actors that are part of the system's life cycle, and
considers previous aspects from different lenses. A more holistic vision
contemplates four essential axes: the global principles for ethical use and
development of AI-based systems, a philosophical take on AI ethics, a
risk-based approach to AI regulation, and the mentioned pillars and
requirements. The seven requirements (human agency and oversight; robustness
and safety; privacy and data governance; transparency; diversity,
non-discrimination and fairness; societal and environmental wellbeing; and
accountability) are analyzed from a triple perspective: What each requirement
for trustworthy AI is, Why it is needed, and How each requirement can be
implemented in practice. On the other hand, a practical approach to implement
trustworthy AI systems allows defining the concept of responsibility of
AI-based systems facing the law, through a given auditing process. Therefore, a
responsible AI system is the resulting notion we introduce in this work, and a
concept of utmost necessity that can be realized through auditing processes,
subject to the challenges posed by the use of regulatory sandboxes. Our
multidisciplinary vision of trustworthy AI culminates in a debate on the
diverging views published lately about the future of AI. Our reflections in
this matter conclude that regulation is a key for reaching a consensus among
these views, and that trustworthy and responsible AI systems will be crucial
for the present and future of our society.Comment: 30 pages, 5 figures, under second revie
How Physicality Enables Trust: A New Era of Trust-Centered Cyberphysical Systems
Multi-agent cyberphysical systems enable new capabilities in efficiency,
resilience, and security. The unique characteristics of these systems prompt a
reevaluation of their security concepts, including their vulnerabilities, and
mechanisms to mitigate these vulnerabilities. This survey paper examines how
advancement in wireless networking, coupled with the sensing and computing in
cyberphysical systems, can foster novel security capabilities. This study
delves into three main themes related to securing multi-agent cyberphysical
systems. First, we discuss the threats that are particularly relevant to
multi-agent cyberphysical systems given the potential lack of trust between
agents. Second, we present prospects for sensing, contextual awareness, and
authentication, enabling the inference and measurement of ``inter-agent trust"
for these systems. Third, we elaborate on the application of quantifiable trust
notions to enable ``resilient coordination," where ``resilient" signifies
sustained functionality amid attacks on multiagent cyberphysical systems. We
refer to the capability of cyberphysical systems to self-organize, and
coordinate to achieve a task as autonomy. This survey unveils the cyberphysical
character of future interconnected systems as a pivotal catalyst for realizing
robust, trust-centered autonomy in tomorrow's world
Cross-Modal Health State Estimation
Individuals create and consume more diverse data about themselves today than
any time in history. Sources of this data include wearable devices, images,
social media, geospatial information and more. A tremendous opportunity rests
within cross-modal data analysis that leverages existing domain knowledge
methods to understand and guide human health. Especially in chronic diseases,
current medical practice uses a combination of sparse hospital based biological
metrics (blood tests, expensive imaging, etc.) to understand the evolving
health status of an individual. Future health systems must integrate data
created at the individual level to better understand health status perpetually,
especially in a cybernetic framework. In this work we fuse multiple user
created and open source data streams along with established biomedical domain
knowledge to give two types of quantitative state estimates of cardiovascular
health. First, we use wearable devices to calculate cardiorespiratory fitness
(CRF), a known quantitative leading predictor of heart disease which is not
routinely collected in clinical settings. Second, we estimate inherent genetic
traits, living environmental risks, circadian rhythm, and biological metrics
from a diverse dataset. Our experimental results on 24 subjects demonstrate how
multi-modal data can provide personalized health insight. Understanding the
dynamic nature of health status will pave the way for better health based
recommendation engines, better clinical decision making and positive lifestyle
changes.Comment: Accepted to ACM Multimedia 2018 Conference - Brave New Ideas, Seoul,
Korea, ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-5665-7/18/1
- âŠ