An example-based approach to translating sign language

Users of sign languages are often forced to use a language in which they have reduced competence simply because documentation in their preferred format is not available. While some research exists on translating between natural and sign languages, we present here what we believe to be the first attempt to tackle this problem using an example-based (EBMT) approach. Having obtained a set of English–Dutch Sign Language examples, we employ an approach to EBMT using the ‘Marker Hypothesis’ (Green, 1979), analogous to the successful system of (Way & Gough, 2003), (Gough & Way, 2004a) and (Gough & Way, 2004b). In a set of experiments, we show that encouragingly good translation quality may be obtained using such an approach

ATLAS: A flexible and extensible architecture for linguistic annotation

We describe a formal model for annotating linguistic artifacts, from which we derive an application programming interface (API) to a suite of tools for manipulating these annotations. The abstract logical model provides for a range of storage formats and promotes the reuse of tools that interact through this API. We focus first on ``Annotation Graphs,'' a graph model for annotations on linear signals (such as text and speech) indexed by intervals, for which efficient database storage and querying techniques are applicable. We note how a wide range of existing annotated corpora can be mapped to this annotation graph model. This model is then generalized to encompass a wider variety of linguistic ``signals,'' including both naturally occuring phenomena (as recorded in images, video, multi-modal interactions, etc.), as well as the derived resources that are increasingly important to the engineering of natural language processing systems (such as word lists, dictionaries, aligned bilingual corpora, etc.). We conclude with a review of the current efforts towards implementing key pieces of this architecture.Comment: 8 pages, 9 figure

Dictionary writing system (DWS) plus corpus query package (CQP): the case of TshwaneLex

In this article the integrated corpus query functionality of the dictionary compilation software TshwanelLex is analysed. Attention is given to the handling of both raw corpus data and annotated corpus data. With regard to the latter it is shown how, with a minimum of human effort, machine learning techniques can be employed to obtain part-of-speech tagged corpora that can be used for lexicographic purposes. All points are illustrated with data drawn from English and Northern Sotho. The tools and techniques themselves, however, are language-independent, and as Such the encouraging outcomes of this study are far-reaching

In no uncertain terms : a dataset for monolingual and multilingual automatic term extraction from comparable corpora

Automatic term extraction is a productive field of research within natural language processing, but it still faces significant obstacles regarding datasets and evaluation, which require manual term annotation. This is an arduous task, made even more difficult by the lack of a clear distinction between terms and general language, which results in low inter-annotator agreement. There is a large need for well-documented, manually validated datasets, especially in the rising field of multilingual term extraction from comparable corpora, which presents a unique new set of challenges. In this paper, a new approach is presented for both monolingual and multilingual term annotation in comparable corpora. The detailed guidelines with different term labels, the domain- and language-independent methodology and the large volumes annotated in three different languages and four different domains make this a rich resource. The resulting datasets are not just suited for evaluation purposes but can also serve as a general source of information about terms and even as training data for supervised methods. Moreover, the gold standard for multilingual term extraction from comparable corpora contains information about term variants and translation equivalents, which allows an in-depth, nuanced evaluation

Sign language translation with pseudo-glosses

La Traducció de la Llengua de Signes és un problema obert que té com a objectiu generar frases escrites a partir de vídeos de signes. En els darrers anys, molts treballs de recerca que s'han desenvolupat en aquest camp van abordar principalment la tasca de Reconeixement de la Llengua de Signes, que consisteix a comprendre els signes d'entrada i transcriure'ls en seqüències d'anotacions. A més, els estudis actuals mostren que aprofitar aquesta darrera tasca ajuda a aprendre representacions significatives i es pot veure com un pas intermig cap a l'objectiu final de traducció. En aquest treball, presentem un mètode per generar pseudo-glosses automàtiques a partir de les frases escrites, que pot funcionar com a substitució de les glosses reals. Això aborda el problema de la seva adquisició, ja que s'han d'anotar manualment i és extremadament costós. A més, introduïm una nova implementació basada en Fairseq de l'enfocament del model Transformer introduït per Camgoz et al., que està entrenat conjuntament per resoldre les tasques de reconeixement i traducció. També proporcionem nous resultats de referència per ambdues implementacions: en primer lloc, per la base de dades Phoenix, presentem resultats que superen els proporcionats per Camgoz et al. en el seu treball i, en segon lloc, per la base de dades How2Sign, presentem els primers resultats de la tasca de traducció. Aquests resultats poden servir de base per a futures investigacions en el camp.Sign Language Translation is an open problem whose goal is to generate written sentences from sign videos. In recent years, many research works that have been developed in this field mainly addressed the Sign Language Recognition task, which consists in understanding the input signs and transcribing them into sequences of annotations. Moreover, current studies show that taking advantage of the latter task helps to learn meaningful representations and can be seen as an intermediate step towards the end goal of translation. In this work, we present a method to generate automatic pseudo-glosses from written sentences, which can work as a replacement for real glosses. This addresses the issue of their collection, as they need to be manually annotated and it is extremely costly. Furthermore, we introduce a new implementation built on Fairseq of the Transformer-model approach introduced by Camgoz et al., which is jointly trained to solve the recognition and translation tasks. Besides, we provide new baseline results on both implementations: first, on the Phoenix dataset, we present results that outperform the ones provided by Camgoz et al. in their work, and, second, on the How2Sign dataset, we present the first results on the translation task. These results can work as a baseline for future research in the field

A survey on mouth modeling and analysis for Sign Language recognition

© 2015 IEEE.Around 70 million Deaf worldwide use Sign Languages (SLs) as their native languages. At the same time, they have limited reading/writing skills in the spoken language. This puts them at a severe disadvantage in many contexts, including education, work, usage of computers and the Internet. Automatic Sign Language Recognition (ASLR) can support the Deaf in many ways, e.g. by enabling the development of systems for Human-Computer Interaction in SL and translation between sign and spoken language. Research in ASLR usually revolves around automatic understanding of manual signs. Recently, ASLR research community has started to appreciate the importance of non-manuals, since they are related to the lexical meaning of a sign, the syntax and the prosody. Nonmanuals include body and head pose, movement of the eyebrows and the eyes, as well as blinks and squints. Arguably, the mouth is one of the most involved parts of the face in non-manuals. Mouth actions related to ASLR can be either mouthings, i.e. visual syllables with the mouth while signing, or non-verbal mouth gestures. Both are very important in ASLR. In this paper, we present the first survey on mouth non-manuals in ASLR. We start by showing why mouth motion is important in SL and the relevant techniques that exist within ASLR. Since limited research has been conducted regarding automatic analysis of mouth motion in the context of ALSR, we proceed by surveying relevant techniques from the areas of automatic mouth expression and visual speech recognition which can be applied to the task. Finally, we conclude by presenting the challenges and potentials of automatic analysis of mouth motion in the context of ASLR