38 research outputs found

    Surrogate-based optimization of tidal turbine arrays: a case study for the Faro-Olhรฃo inlet

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a study for estimating the size of a tidal turbine array for the Faro-Olhรฃo Inlet (Potugal) using a surrogate optimization approach. The method compromises problem formulation, hydro-morphodynamic modelling, surrogate construction and validation, and constraint optimization. A total of 26 surrogates were built using linear RBFs as a function of two design variables: number of rows in the array and Tidal Energy Converters (TECs) per row. Surrogates describe array performance and environmental effects associated with hydrodynamic and morphological aspects of the multi inlet lagoon. After validation, surrogate models were used to formulate a constraint optimization model. Results evidence that the largest array size that satisfies performance and environmental constraints is made of 3 rows and 10 TECs per row.Eduardo Gonzรกlez-Gorbeรฑa has received funding for the OpTiCA project (http://msca-optica.eu/) from the Marie Skล‚odowska-Curie Actions of the European Union's H2020-MSCA-IF-EF-RI-2016 / GA#: 748747. The paper is a contribution to the SCORE pro-ject, funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCTโ€“PTDC/AAG-TEC/1710/2014). Andrรฉ Pacheco was supported by the Portuguese Foun-dation for Science and Technology under the Portuguese Researchersโ€™ Programme 2014 entitled โ€œExploring new concepts for extracting energy from tidesโ€ (IF/00286/2014/CP1234).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Adjoint-based optimization methods for flow problems

    Get PDF
    Over the last decade, adjoint sensitivity analysis has become an established technique for the task of shape optimisation when many degrees of freedom are present. The success stems from the fact that the adjoint approach only needs one flow simulation for both the primal and the adjoint system, no matter how many design parameters are present. The derivation of the continuous adjoint approach is based on an augmented cost function which inheres the primal governing equations (here the RANS-equations) as constraints which have to be satisfied in the computational domain. Accordingly, the primal RANS equations are augmented with Lagrange multipliers and added to the thermal-fluid dynamic cost function. For shape optimisation, the variational formulation of the augmented cost function indicates the behaviour of the cost function with the variation of the shape, i.e. the variation of the surface mesh in normal direction. We present the derivation and application of the continuous adjoint approach for the incom- pressible Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations augmented with heat transfer. The derived approach is implemented into the framework of the C++ CFD toolbox OpenFOAM in order to derive a complete design cycle for shape optimisation. The derived optimisation process is applied to dimpled surface geometries in order to optimise cooling devices

    Aplikasi Algoritma Simulated Annealing untuk Menentukan Formasi Tata Letak Turbin pada Marine Current Turbine Farm di Selat Riau

    Get PDF
    Artikel ini mempresentasikan permasalahan penentuan tata letak turbin pada sebuah Marine Current Turbine Farm (MCTF) dengan pendekatan model matematis. Fungsi tujuannya adalah minimisi biaya per produksi energi yang dihasilkan pada MCTF. Model matematis yang digunakan mempertimbangkan interaksi yang terjadi antar turbin yang dipengaruhi oleh wake effects, dimana wake effect menyebabkan penurunan kecepatan arus yang melewati turbin yang diletakkan di hilir. Algoritma Simulated Annealing diaplikasikan untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan tersebut. Hasil studi kasus di Selat Riau menunjukkan bahwa algoritma Simulated Annealing memiliki performa yang lebih baik dibandingkan algoritma Tabu Search. Hal ini ditandai dengan formasi tata letak yang dihasilkan algoritma Simulated Annealing memiliki biaya per produksi energi yang lebih rendah dibandingkan algoritma Tabu Search.&nbsp

    Discrete adjoint-based simultaneous analysis and design approach for conceptual aerodynamic optimization

    Get PDF
    In this paper, a simultaneous analysis and design method is derived and applied for a non-linear constrained aerodynamic optimization problem. The method is based on the approach of defining a Lagrange functional based on the objective function and the aerodynamic modelโ€™s equations, using two sets of multipliers. A fully-coupled, non-linear system of equations is derived by requiring that the Gateaux variation of the Lagrange functional vanishes for arbitrary variations of the aerodynamic modelโ€™s dependent variables and design parameters. The optimization problem is approached using a one-shot technique, by solving the non-linear system in which all sensitivities and problem constraints are included. The computational efficiency of the method is compared against a gradient-based optimization algorithm using adjoint-provided gradient. A conceptual-stage aerodynamic optimization problem is solved, based on a non-linear numerical lifting-line method with viscous corrections

    ๋น„์ •์ƒ์œ ๋™์ด ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฐœ์ „๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฐฐ์น˜์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ฑด์„คํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022.2. ํ™ฉ์ง„ํ™˜.Due to the global climate crisis and the air pollution, demand on the renewable energy is consequently increasing as one of the main efforts. Wind and solar energy are taking the lead on the renewable energy industry, and as of the next competitive resource, tidal power is estimated to have a huge potential, thanks to its high energy density and easily predictable characteristics. Tidal power has not reached the practical level yet, due to financial challenges. In terms of reducing the cost and reach the competitive level of LCOE, the power extraction should be maximized within the constraints by conducting layout optimization of the turbines deployed, hence, understanding, and predicting the algorithm for layout optimization is necessary. The layout optimization for the tidal turbine is somewhat sophisticated, due to the unsteady tidal current condition in the nature, hence previous studies have found the problem under the steady condition. However, since the unsteadiness is a critical feature of the tidal current, there needs a study on the distinctive optimization characteristics under the unsteady condition. This study aims to find the tidal turbine farm layout optimization problem under the simplified unsteady tidal current condition in the nature and identify if the tidal turbine farm layout optimization procedure under unsteady condition can converges to find the global optimum. A number of numerical experiments were handled during the study to find the general trend/pattern of convergence to the global optimum under the various unsteady condition, with variation in the amplitude and the direction. The study first demonstrated the difference in the wake profile and the energy production of a single turbine under steady & unsteady flow, to be used as the basic assumption when figuring out the characteristics of layout optimization procedure under unsteady condition. The study also demonstrated the insight of the optimized layout and the minimum velocity threshold that enables the optimization to converge to the globally optimized layout at a given tolerance under steady condition. Finally, generalization of the strategy for the tidal turbine farm layout optimization under the unsteady flow was presented by finding the difference in the optimization procedure between steady & unsteady flow. It has been discovered that optimal layout under unidirectional, unsteady flow condition is similar to the optimal layout under steady condition when it satisfies the minimum velocity threshold condition. However, optimal layout under bidirectional conditions was totally different to the optimal layout under unidirectional conditions, to consider the wake effect from both directions. Under the bidirectional flow condition, the turbines were found to be staggered with respect to each other in order to take advantage of local speedups between upwind turbines. The numerical experiments were performed with OpenTidalFarm, an open-source solver for specific PDE-constrained, gradient-based optimization problems, especially those related to tidal farm design. The simulation domain was described as a rectangular farm, PDE is given as two-dimensional nonlinear shallow water equations, total power output is the target functional to be maximized, and turbine was parameterized as a bump function. Adjoint method was used as to compute the gradient for the optimization problem.์„ธ๊ณ„์ ์ธ ๊ธฐํ›„ ์œ„๊ธฐ์™€ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์˜ค์—ผ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด, ์žฌ์ƒ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์š”๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ’๋ ฅ๊ณผ ํƒœ์–‘๊ด‘ ๋ฐœ์ „์ด ์‹ ์žฌ์ƒ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์‚ฐ์—…์„ ์„ ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์€ ๋†’์€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๋ฐ€๋„์™€ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์•ž์œผ๋กœ์˜ ์ž ์žฌ๋ ฅ์ด ํด ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋œ๋‹ค. ์กฐ๋ฅ˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์€ ์•„์ง ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์‹ค์šฉํ™” ์ˆ˜์ค€์— ์ด๋ฅด์ง€ ๋ชปํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ๋ ฅ์„ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋น„์šฉ์ ˆ๊ฐ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ „๋ ฅ ์ถ”์ถœ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด์— ์ œ์•ฝ ์กฐ๊ฑด ๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ํ„ฐ๋นˆ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๊ฐ€ ์„ ํ–‰๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฐœ์ „ ๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์— ๋‹ค์ˆ˜ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์™”์œผ๋‚˜, ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™์—์„œ์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๋‹ค์†Œ ๋ณต์žกํ•ด ์ •์ƒ์œ ๋™ ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ๊ฐ€์ •์ด ์ฃผ๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜, ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋Š” ๋‹ฌ๊ณผ ํƒœ์–‘์˜ ๊ธฐ์กฐ๋ ฅ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์ž„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™์ด๋ผ๋Š” ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ”, ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•œ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฐœ์ „๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ดํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ด ๋•Œ์˜ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์˜ ํ•ด๊ฐ€ ์ „์—ญ ์ตœ์ ํ•ด์— ์ˆ˜๋ ดํ•˜๋Š”๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ง„ํญ๊ณผ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์ˆ˜๋ฐฑ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์‹คํ—˜์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฐœ์ „๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ถ”์„ธ์™€ ์ตœ์ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™๊ณผ ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์— ๋‹จ์ผ ํ„ฐ๋นˆ์„ ๋‘์–ด ๊ฐ ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ํ›„๋ฅ˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ƒ์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์ตœ์ ํ•ด์— ๋„๋‹ฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ž„๊ณ„ ์†๋„ ๊ฐ’์„ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ์ˆ˜์น˜์‹คํ—˜์— ์„ ํ–‰ ๊ฐ€์ •์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฐœ์ „๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฐฐ์น˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ถ”์„ธ์™€ ์ตœ์ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋น„์ •์ƒ ๋‹จ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์œ ๋™์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ž„๊ณ„ ์†๋„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์ •์ƒ ์œ ๋™ ํ•˜์—์„œ์˜ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฐ์น˜์™€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์ง€๋งŒ, ๋น„์ •์ƒ ์–‘๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์œ ๋™์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ํ„ฐ๋นˆ์ด ๊ต์ฐจ ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋œ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์  ๋ฐฐ์น˜๋กœ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜์‹คํ—˜์—๋Š” ํŒŒ์ด์ฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์˜คํ”ˆ์†Œ์Šค ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด์ธ OpenTidal Farm์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜์‹คํ—˜์€ ์ง์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜• ์กฐ๋ฅ˜๋ฐœ์ „ ๋‹จ์ง€ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์กŒ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŽธ๋ฏธ๋ถ„ ๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์€ 2์ฐจ์› ์ฒœ์ˆ˜๋ฐฉ์ •์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๊ณ , ๋ชฉ์ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋Š” ์ด์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ถ”์ถœ๋Ÿ‰์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ„ฐ๋นˆ์€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™”์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ๋” ๋ฒ”ํ”„ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋งค๊ฐœ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ํ™” ๋˜์–ด ์‹คํ—˜์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค.ABSTRACT i TABLE OF CONTENTS iv List of Figures vii List of Symbol xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General introduction 1 1.2 Objective 2 CHAPTER 2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUDS 7 2.1 General evolution of the renewable energy 7 2.2 Tidal turbine farm 10 2.2.1 The physics of tide 10 2.2.2 The physics of tidal currents - unsteadiness 13 2.2.3 Tidal turbine 15 2.2.4 Tidal energy resources in Korea 17 2.3 Shallow water equation (SWE) 19 2.4 Gradient-based optimization using adjoint method 21 2.4.1 Problem formulation 22 2.4.2 The adjoint method 22 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY 25 3.1 Numerical model description 25 3.1.1 The design parameters 25 3.1.2 The PDE constraints 25 3.1.3 The turbine parameterization 26 3.1.4 The functional of interest 27 3.1.5 Box and inequality constraints 27 3.1.6 Optimization algorithm 28 3.2 Experiment overview 29 3.2.1 Experiment procedure 29 3.2.2 Experimental flow chart 31 3.3 Simulation set-up 31 3.3.1 Mesh domain 31 3.3.2 Boundary condition 33 3.3.3 Parameter settings 36 CHAPTER 4. Test cases, Results and Discussions 39 4.1 Pilot Test 1: Steady & Unsteady flow impact on a single turbine 39 4.1.1 Wake behavior 39 4.1.2 comparison criterion between steady and unsteady flow based on the energy production 46 4.1.3 Conclusion of Pilot test 1 48 4.2 Pilot Test 2: Minimum velocity threshold (MVT) to converge to QGO and the concept of the optimized layout 49 4.2.1 Test cases 49 4.2.2 Finding minimum threshold of velocity (MVT) 51 4.2.3 Insights on the optimized layout 55 4.2.4 Conclusion of Pilot test 2 57 4.3 Main test: Effect of unsteadiness in the optimization procedure compared to the steady condition 59 4.3.1 Test cases 59 4.3.2 Optimal layout for each flow conditions 62 4.3.3 Strategy to obtain QGO for bidirectional flow condition 70 4.3.4 Conclusion of Main test 71 CHAPTER 5. Conclusions 73 REFERENCES 76 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 80์„
    corecore