3 research outputs found
Three Optimisations for Sharing
In order to improve precision and efficiency sharing analysis should track
both freeness and linearity. The abstract unification algorithms for these
combined domains are suboptimal, hence there is scope for improving precision.
This paper proposes three optimisations for tracing sharing in combination with
freeness and linearity. A novel connection between equations and sharing
abstractions is used to establish correctness of these optimisations even in
the presence of rational trees. A method for pruning intermediate sharing
abstractions to improve efficiency is also proposed. The optimisations are
lightweight and therefore some, if not all, of these optimisations will be of
interest to the implementor.Comment: To appear in Theiry and Practice of Logic Programmin
A correct, precise and efficient integration of set-sharing, freeness and linearity for the analysis of finite and rational tree languages
It is well known that freeness and linearity information positively interact with aliasing information, allowing both the precision and the efficiency of the sharing analysis of logic programs to be improved. In this paper, we present a novel combination of set-sharing with freeness and linearity information, which is characterized by an improved abstract unification operator. We provide a new abstraction function and prove the correctness of the analysis for both the finite tree and the rational tree cases.
Moreover, we show that the same notion of redundant information as identified in Bagnara et al. (2000) and Zaffanella et al. (2002) also applies to this abstract domain combination: this allows for the implementation of an abstract unification operator running in polynomial time and achieving the same precision on all the considered observable properties
Optimality in Goal-Dependent Analysis of Sharing
We face the problems of correctness, optimality and precision for the static
analysis of logic programs, using the theory of abstract interpretation. We
propose a framework with a denotational, goal-dependent semantics equipped with
two unification operators for forward unification (calling a procedure) and
backward unification (returning from a procedure). The latter is implemented
through a matching operation. Our proposal clarifies and unifies many different
frameworks and ideas on static analysis of logic programming in a single,
formal setting. On the abstract side, we focus on the domain Sharing by Jacobs
and Langen and provide the best correct approximation of all the primitive
semantic operators, namely, projection, renaming, forward and backward
unification. We show that the abstract unification operators are strictly more
precise than those in the literature defined over the same abstract domain. In
some cases, our operators are more precise than those developed for more
complex domains involving linearity and freeness.
To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP