3,167 research outputs found
Restricted Space Algorithms for Isomorphism on Bounded Treewidth Graphs
The Graph Isomorphism problem restricted to graphs of bounded treewidth or
bounded tree distance width are known to be solvable in polynomial time
[Bod90],[YBFT99]. We give restricted space algorithms for these problems
proving the following results: - Isomorphism for bounded tree distance width
graphs is in L and thus complete for the class. We also show that for this kind
of graphs a canon can be computed within logspace. - For bounded treewidth
graphs, when both input graphs are given together with a tree decomposition,
the problem of whether there is an isomorphism which respects the
decompositions (i.e. considering only isomorphisms mapping bags in one
decomposition blockwise onto bags in the other decomposition) is in L. - For
bounded treewidth graphs, when one of the input graphs is given with a tree
decomposition the isomorphism problem is in LogCFL. - As a corollary the
isomorphism problem for bounded treewidth graphs is in LogCFL. This improves
the known TC1 upper bound for the problem given by Grohe and Verbitsky
[GroVer06].Comment: STACS conference 2010, 12 page
Sparsest Cut on Bounded Treewidth Graphs: Algorithms and Hardness Results
We give a 2-approximation algorithm for Non-Uniform Sparsest Cut that runs in
time , where is the treewidth of the graph. This improves on the
previous -approximation in time \poly(n) 2^{O(k)} due to
Chlamt\'a\v{c} et al.
To complement this algorithm, we show the following hardness results: If the
Non-Uniform Sparsest Cut problem has a -approximation for series-parallel
graphs (where ), then the Max Cut problem has an algorithm with
approximation factor arbitrarily close to . Hence, even for such
restricted graphs (which have treewidth 2), the Sparsest Cut problem is NP-hard
to approximate better than for ; assuming the
Unique Games Conjecture the hardness becomes . For
graphs with large (but constant) treewidth, we show a hardness result of assuming the Unique Games Conjecture.
Our algorithm rounds a linear program based on (a subset of) the
Sherali-Adams lift of the standard Sparsest Cut LP. We show that even for
treewidth-2 graphs, the LP has an integrality gap close to 2 even after
polynomially many rounds of Sherali-Adams. Hence our approach cannot be
improved even on such restricted graphs without using a stronger relaxation
Bicriteria Network Design Problems
We study a general class of bicriteria network design problems. A generic
problem in this class is as follows: Given an undirected graph and two
minimization objectives (under different cost functions), with a budget
specified on the first, find a <subgraph \from a given subgraph-class that
minimizes the second objective subject to the budget on the first. We consider
three different criteria - the total edge cost, the diameter and the maximum
degree of the network. Here, we present the first polynomial-time approximation
algorithms for a large class of bicriteria network design problems for the
above mentioned criteria. The following general types of results are presented.
First, we develop a framework for bicriteria problems and their
approximations. Second, when the two criteria are the same %(note that the cost
functions continue to be different) we present a ``black box'' parametric
search technique. This black box takes in as input an (approximation) algorithm
for the unicriterion situation and generates an approximation algorithm for the
bicriteria case with only a constant factor loss in the performance guarantee.
Third, when the two criteria are the diameter and the total edge costs we use a
cluster-based approach to devise a approximation algorithms --- the solutions
output violate both the criteria by a logarithmic factor. Finally, for the
class of treewidth-bounded graphs, we provide pseudopolynomial-time algorithms
for a number of bicriteria problems using dynamic programming. We show how
these pseudopolynomial-time algorithms can be converted to fully
polynomial-time approximation schemes using a scaling technique.Comment: 24 pages 1 figur
Are there any good digraph width measures?
Several different measures for digraph width have appeared in the last few
years. However, none of them shares all the "nice" properties of treewidth:
First, being \emph{algorithmically useful} i.e. admitting polynomial-time
algorithms for all \MS1-definable problems on digraphs of bounded width. And,
second, having nice \emph{structural properties} i.e. being monotone under
taking subdigraphs and some form of arc contractions. As for the former,
(undirected) \MS1 seems to be the least common denominator of all reasonably
expressive logical languages on digraphs that can speak about the edge/arc
relation on the vertex set.The latter property is a necessary condition for a
width measure to be characterizable by some version of the cops-and-robber game
characterizing the ordinary treewidth. Our main result is that \emph{any
reasonable} algorithmically useful and structurally nice digraph measure cannot
be substantially different from the treewidth of the underlying undirected
graph. Moreover, we introduce \emph{directed topological minors} and argue that
they are the weakest useful notion of minors for digraphs
- …