Implicit factorization of unbalanced RSA moduli

International audienceLet N1 = p1q1 and N2 = p2q2 be two RSA moduli, not necessarily of the same bit-size. In 2009, May and Ritzenhofen proposed a method to factor N1 and N2 given the implicit information that p1 and p2 share an amount of least significant bits. In this paper, we propose a generalization of their attack as follows: suppose that some unknown multiples a1p1 and a2p2 of the prime factors p1 and p2 share an amount of their Most Significant Bits (MSBs) or an amount of their Least Significant Bits (LSBs). Using a method based on the continued fraction algorithm, we propose a method that leads to the factorization of N1 and N2. Using simultaneous diophantine approximations and lattice reduction , we extend the method to factor k ≥ 3 RSA moduli Ni = piqi, i = 1,. .. , k given the implicit information that there exist unknown multiples a1p1,. .. , ak pk sharing an amount of their MSBs or their LSBs. Also, this paper extends many previous works where similar results were obtained when the pi's share their MSBs or their LSBs

Computation of Discrete Logarithms in GF(2^607)

International audienceWe describe in this article how we have been able to extend the record for computations of discrete logarithms in characteristic 2 from the previous record over GF(2^503) to a newer mark of GF(2^607), using Coppersmith's algorithm. This has been made possible by several practical improvements to the algorithm. Although the computations have been carried out on fairly standard hardware, our opinion is that we are nearing the current limits of the manageable sizes for this algorithm, and that going substantially further will require deeper improvements to the method

A polynomial time attack on RSA with private CRT-exponents smaller than N0.073N^{0.073}

Wiener’s famous attack on RSA with d

Generalized Implicit Factorization Problem

The Implicit Factorization Problem (IFP) was first introduced by May and Ritzenhofen at PKC\u2709, which concerns the factorization of two RSA moduli $N_1=p_1q_1$ and $N_2=p_2q_2$, where $p_1$ and $p_2$ share a certain consecutive number of least significant bits. Since its introduction, many different variants of IFP have been considered, such as the cases where $p_1$ and $p_2$ share most significant bits or middle bits at the same positions. In this paper, we consider a more generalized case of IFP, in which the shared consecutive bits can be located at $any$ positions in each prime, not necessarily required to be located at the same positions as before. We propose a lattice-based algorithm to solve this problem under specific conditions, and also provide some experimental results to verify our analysis

Solving Linear Equations Modulo Unknown Divisors: Revisited

We revisit the problem of finding small solutions to a collection of linear equations modulo an unknown divisor $p$ for a known composite integer $N$. In CaLC 2001, Howgrave-Graham introduced an efficient algorithm for solving univariate linear equations; since then, two forms of multivariate generalizations have been considered in the context of cryptanalysis: modular multivariate linear equations by Herrmann and May (Asiacrypt\u2708) and simultaneous modular univariate linear equations by Cohn and Heninger (ANTS\u2712). Their algorithms have many important applications in cryptanalysis, such as factoring with known bits problem, fault attacks on RSA signatures, analysis of approximate GCD problem, etc. In this paper, by introducing multiple parameters, we propose several generalizations of the above equations. The motivation behind these extensions is that some attacks on RSA variants can be reduced to solving these generalized equations, and previous algorithms do not apply. We present new approaches to solve them, and compared with previous methods, our new algorithms are more flexible and especially suitable for some cases. Applying our algorithms, we obtain the best analytical/experimental results for some attacks on RSA and its variants, specifically, \begin{itemize} \item We improve May\u27s results (PKC\u2704) on small secret exponent attack on RSA variant with moduli $N = p^rq$ ($r\geq 2$). \item We experimentally improve Boneh et al.\u27s algorithm (Crypto\u2798) on factoring $N=p^rq$ ($r\geq 2$) with known bits problem. \item We significantly improve Jochemsz-May\u27 attack (Asiacrypt\u2706) on Common Prime RSA. \item We extend Nitaj\u27s result (Africacrypt\u2712) on weak encryption exponents of RSA and CRT-RSA. \end{itemize

Exponential Increment of RSA Attack Range via Lattice Based Cryptanalysis

The RSA cryptosystem comprises of two important features that are needed for encryption process known as the public parameter $e$ and the modulus $N$. In 1999, a cryptanalysis on RSA which was described by Boneh and Durfee focused on the key equation $ed-k\phi(N)=1$ and $e$ of the same magnitude to $N$. Their method was applicable for the case of $d<N^{0.292}$ via Coppersmith’s technique. In 2012, Kumar et al. presented an improved Boneh-Durfee attack using the same equation which is valid for any e with arbitrary size. In this paper, we present an exponential increment of the two former attacks using the variant equation $ea-\phi(N)b=c$. The new attack breaks the RSA system when $a$ and $|c|$ are suitably small integers. Moreover, the new attack shows that the Boneh-Durfee attack and the attack of Kumar et al. can be derived using a single attack. We also showed that our bound manage to improve the bounds of Ariffin et al. and Bunder and Tonien

On the Regularity of Lossy RSA: Improved Bounds and Applications to Padding-Based Encryption

We provide new bounds on how close to regular the map x |--> x^e is on arithmetic progressions in Z_N, assuming e | Phi(N) and N is composite. We use these bounds to analyze the security of natural cryptographic problems related to RSA, based on the well-studied Phi-Hiding assumption. For example, under this assumption, we show that RSA PKCS #1 v1.5 is secure against chosen-plaintext attacks for messages of length roughly (log N)/4 bits, whereas the previous analysis, due to Lewko et al (2013), applies only to messages of length less than (log N)/32. In addition to providing new bounds, we also show that a key lemma of Lewko et al. is incorrect. We prove a weaker version of the claim which is nonetheless sufficient for most, though not all, of their applications. Our technical results can be viewed as showing that exponentiation in Z_N is a deterministic extractor for every source that is uniform on an arithmetic progression. Previous work showed this type of statement only on average over a large class of sources, or for much longer progressions (that is, sources with much more entropy)

On the Security of Some Variants of RSA

The RSA cryptosystem, named after its inventors, Rivest, Shamir and Adleman, is the most widely known and widely used public-key cryptosystem in the world today. Compared to other public-key cryptosystems, such as elliptic curve cryptography, RSA requires longer keylengths and is computationally more expensive. In order to address these shortcomings, many variants of RSA have been proposed over the years. While the security of RSA has been well studied since it was proposed in 1977, many of these variants have not. In this thesis, we investigate the security of five of these variants of RSA. In particular, we provide detailed analyses of the best known algebraic attacks (including some new attacks) on instances of RSA with certain special private exponents, multiple instances of RSA sharing a common small private exponent, Multi-prime RSA, Common Prime RSA and Dual RSA

Multi-power Post-quantum RSA

Special purpose factoring algorithms have discouraged the adoption of multi-power RSA, even in a post-quantum setting. We revisit the known attacks and find that a general recommendation against repeated factors is unwarranted. We find that one-terabyte RSA keys of the form $n = p_1^2p_2^3p_3^5p_4^7\cdots p_i^{\pi_i}\cdots p_{20044}^{225287}$ are competitive with one-terabyte RSA keys of the form $n = p_1p_2p_3p_4\cdots p_i\cdots p_{2^{31}}$. Prime generation can be made to be a factor of 100000 times faster at a loss of at least $1$ but not more than $17$ bits of security against known attacks. The range depends on the relative cost of bit and qubit operations under the assumption that qubit operations cost $2^c$ bit operations for some constant $c$