71 research outputs found

    The Weisfeiler-Leman Dimension of Planar Graphs is at most 3

    Full text link
    We prove that the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) dimension of the class of all finite planar graphs is at most 3. In particular, every finite planar graph is definable in first-order logic with counting using at most 4 variables. The previously best known upper bounds for the dimension and number of variables were 14 and 15, respectively. First we show that, for dimension 3 and higher, the WL-algorithm correctly tests isomorphism of graphs in a minor-closed class whenever it determines the orbits of the automorphism group of any arc-colored 3-connected graph belonging to this class. Then we prove that, apart from several exceptional graphs (which have WL-dimension at most 2), the individualization of two correctly chosen vertices of a colored 3-connected planar graph followed by the 1-dimensional WL-algorithm produces the discrete vertex partition. This implies that the 3-dimensional WL-algorithm determines the orbits of a colored 3-connected planar graph. As a byproduct of the proof, we get a classification of the 3-connected planar graphs with fixing number 3.Comment: 34 pages, 3 figures, extended version of LICS 2017 pape

    A Linear Upper Bound on the Weisfeiler-Leman Dimension of Graphs of Bounded Genus

    Get PDF
    The Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) dimension of a graph is a measure for the inherent descriptive complexity of the graph. While originally derived from a combinatorial graph isomorphism test called the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm, the WL dimension can also be characterised in terms of the number of variables that is required to describe the graph up to isomorphism in first-order logic with counting quantifiers. It is known that the WL dimension is upper-bounded for all graphs that exclude some fixed graph as a minor [M. Grohe, 2017]. However, the bounds that can be derived from this general result are astronomic. Only recently, it was proved that the WL dimension of planar graphs is at most 3 [S. Kiefer et al., 2017]. In this paper, we prove that the WL dimension of graphs embeddable in a surface of Euler genus g is at most 4g+3. For the WL dimension of graphs embeddable in an orientable surface of Euler genus g, our approach yields an upper bound of 2g + 3

    Canonisation and Definability for Graphs of Bounded Rank Width

    Full text link
    We prove that the combinatorial Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm of dimension (3k+4)(3k+4) is a complete isomorphism test for the class of all graphs of rank width at most kk. Rank width is a graph invariant that, similarly to tree width, measures the width of a certain style of hierarchical decomposition of graphs; it is equivalent to clique width. It was known that isomorphism of graphs of rank width kk is decidable in polynomial time (Grohe and Schweitzer, FOCS 2015), but the best previously known algorithm has a running time nf(k)n^{f(k)} for a non-elementary function ff. Our result yields an isomorphism test for graphs of rank width kk running in time nO(k)n^{O(k)}. Another consequence of our result is the first polynomial time canonisation algorithm for graphs of bounded rank width. Our second main result is that fixed-point logic with counting captures polynomial time on all graph classes of bounded rank width.Comment: 32 page

    The Power of the Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm to Decompose Graphs

    Get PDF
    The Weisfeiler-Leman procedure is a widely-used approach for graph isomorphism testing that works by iteratively computing an isomorphism-invariant coloring of vertex tuples. Meanwhile, a fundamental tool in structural graph theory, which is often exploited in approaches to tackle the graph isomorphism problem, is the decomposition into 2- and 3-connected components. We prove that the 2-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm implicitly computes the decomposition of a graph into its 3-connected components. Thus, the dimension of the algorithm needed to distinguish two given graphs is at most the dimension required to distinguish the corresponding decompositions into 3-connected components (assuming it is at least 2). This result implies that for k >= 2, the k-dimensional algorithm distinguishes k-separators, i.e., k-tuples of vertices that separate the graph, from other vertex k-tuples. As a byproduct, we also obtain insights about the connectivity of constituent graphs of association schemes. In an application of the results, we show the new upper bound of k on the Weisfeiler-Leman dimension of graphs of treewidth at most k. Using a construction by Cai, F\"urer, and Immerman, we also provide a new lower bound that is asymptotically tight up to a factor of 2.Comment: 30 pages, 4 figures, full version of a paper accepted at MFCS 201

    On the Weisfeiler-Leman dimension of some polyhedral graphs

    Full text link
    Let mm be a positive integer, XX a graph with vertex set Ω\Omega, and WLm(X){\rm WL}_m(X) the coloring of the Cartesian mm-power Ωm\Omega^m, obtained by the mm-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm. The WL{\rm WL}-dimension of the graph XX is defined to be the smallest mm for which the coloring WLm(X){\rm WL}_m(X) determines XX up to isomorphism. It is known that the WL{\rm WL}-dimension of any planar graph is 22 or 33, but no planar graph of WL{\rm WL}-dimension 33 is known. We prove that the WL{\rm WL}-dimension of a polyhedral (i.e., 33-connected planar) graph XX is at most 22 if the color classes of the coloring WL2(X){\rm WL}_2(X) are the orbits of the componentwise action of the group Aut(X){\rm Aut}(X) on Ω2\Omega^2

    Logarithmic Weisfeiler-Leman Identifies All Planar Graphs

    Get PDF
    The Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) algorithm is a well-known combinatorial procedure for detecting symmetries in graphs and it is widely used in graph-isomorphism tests. It proceeds by iteratively refining a colouring of vertex tuples. The number of iterations needed to obtain the final output is crucial for the parallelisability of the algorithm. We show that there is a constant k such that every planar graph can be identified (that is, distinguished from every non-isomorphic graph) by the k-dimensional WL algorithm within a logarithmic number of iterations. This generalises a result due to Verbitsky (STACS 2007), who proved the same for 3-connected planar graphs. The number of iterations needed by the k-dimensional WL algorithm to identify a graph corresponds to the quantifier depth of a sentence that defines the graph in the (k+1)-variable fragment C^{k+1} of first-order logic with counting quantifiers. Thus, our result implies that every planar graph is definable with a C^{k+1}-sentence of logarithmic quantifier depth

    Logarithmic Weisfeiler--Leman and Treewidth

    Full text link
    In this paper, we show that the (3k+4)(3k+4)-dimensional Weisfeiler--Leman algorithm can identify graphs of treewidth kk in O(logn)O(\log n) rounds. This improves the result of Grohe & Verbitsky (ICALP 2006), who previously established the analogous result for (4k+3)(4k+3)-dimensional Weisfeiler--Leman. In light of the equivalence between Weisfeiler--Leman and the logic FO+C\textsf{FO} + \textsf{C} (Cai, F\"urer, & Immerman, Combinatorica 1992), we obtain an improvement in the descriptive complexity for graphs of treewidth kk. Precisely, if GG is a graph of treewidth kk, then there exists a (3k+5)(3k+5)-variable formula φ\varphi in FO+C\textsf{FO} + \textsf{C} with quantifier depth O(logn)O(\log n) that identifies GG up to isomorphism

    On the Expressivity of Persistent Homology in Graph Learning

    Full text link
    Persistent homology, a technique from computational topology, has recently shown strong empirical performance in the context of graph classification. Being able to capture long range graph properties via higher-order topological features, such as cycles of arbitrary length, in combination with multi-scale topological descriptors, has improved predictive performance for data sets with prominent topological structures, such as molecules. At the same time, the theoretical properties of persistent homology have not been formally assessed in this context. This paper intends to bridge the gap between computational topology and graph machine learning by providing a brief introduction to persistent homology in the context of graphs, as well as a theoretical discussion and empirical analysis of its expressivity for graph learning tasks

    Weisfeiler--Leman and Graph Spectra

    Full text link
    We devise a hierarchy of spectral graph invariants, generalising the adjacency spectra and Laplacian spectra, which are commensurate in power with the hierarchy of combinatorial graph invariants generated by the Weisfeiler--Leman (WL) algorithm. More precisely, we provide a spectral characterisation of kk-WL indistinguishability after dd iterations, for k,dNk,d \in \mathbb{N}. Most of the well-known spectral graph invariants such as adjacency or Laplacian spectra lie in the regime between 1-WL and 2-WL. We show that individualising one vertex plus running 1-WL is already more powerful than all such spectral invariants in terms of their ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs. Building on this result, we resolve an open problem of F\"urer (2010) about spectral invariants and strengthen a result due to Godsil (1981) about commute distances
    corecore