9 research outputs found

    Grassmann Integral Representation for Spanning Hyperforests

    Full text link
    Given a hypergraph G, we introduce a Grassmann algebra over the vertex set, and show that a class of Grassmann integrals permits an expansion in terms of spanning hyperforests. Special cases provide the generating functions for rooted and unrooted spanning (hyper)forests and spanning (hyper)trees. All these results are generalizations of Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem. Furthermore, we show that the class of integrals describing unrooted spanning (hyper)forests is induced by a theory with an underlying OSP(1|2) supersymmetry.Comment: 50 pages, it uses some latex macros. Accepted for publication on J. Phys.

    Spanning trees of 3-uniform hypergraphs

    Full text link
    Masbaum and Vaintrob's "Pfaffian matrix tree theorem" implies that counting spanning trees of a 3-uniform hypergraph (abbreviated to 3-graph) can be done in polynomial time for a class of "3-Pfaffian" 3-graphs, comparable to and related to the class of Pfaffian graphs. We prove a complexity result for recognizing a 3-Pfaffian 3-graph and describe two large classes of 3-Pfaffian 3-graphs -- one of these is given by a forbidden subgraph characterization analogous to Little's for bipartite Pfaffian graphs, and the other consists of a class of partial Steiner triple systems for which the property of being 3-Pfaffian can be reduced to the property of an associated graph being Pfaffian. We exhibit an infinite set of partial Steiner triple systems that are not 3-Pfaffian, none of which can be reduced to any other by deletion or contraction of triples. We also find some necessary or sufficient conditions for the existence of a spanning tree of a 3-graph (much more succinct than can be obtained by the currently fastest polynomial-time algorithm of Gabow and Stallmann for finding a spanning tree) and a superexponential lower bound on the number of spanning trees of a Steiner triple system.Comment: 34 pages, 9 figure

    The NP-completeness of finding A-trails in Eulerian graphs and of finding spanning trees in hypergraphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractSamuel W. Bent and Udi Manber have shown that it is NP-complete to decide whether a simple, 2-connected, plane Eulerian graph has an A-trail, that is, an Eulerian trail in which successive edges are always neighbours in the cyclic, clockwise ordering defined at each vertex of the graph by the given plane representation. We prove, by a different reduction, that the problem remains NP-complete for simple, 3-connected, plane Eulerian graphs for which all face boundaries are 3-cycles or 4-cycles. We then apply this result to show that it is NP-complete to decide whether a linear hypergraph which is regular of degree 3 has a spanning tree

    The NP-completeness of finding A-trails in Eulerian Graphs and of finding Spanning Trees in Hypergraphs

    No full text

    Spanning Structures of Graphs

    Get PDF
    corecore