22 research outputs found
Undecidability of first-order modal and intuitionistic logics with two variables and one monadic predicate letter
We prove that the positive fragment of first-order intuitionistic logic in
the language with two variables and a single monadic predicate letter, without
constants and equality, is undecidable. This holds true regardless of whether
we consider semantics with expanding or constant domains. We then generalise
this result to intervals [QBL, QKC] and [QBL, QFL], where QKC is the logic of
the weak law of the excluded middle and QBL and QFL are first-order
counterparts of Visser's basic and formal logics, respectively. We also show
that, for most "natural" first-order modal logics, the two-variable fragment
with a single monadic predicate letter, without constants and equality, is
undecidable, regardless of whether we consider semantics with expanding or
constant domains. These include all sublogics of QKTB, QGL, and QGrz -- among
them, QK, QT, QKB, QD, QK4, and QS4.Comment: Pre-final version of the paper published in Studia
Logica,doi:10.1007/s11225-018-9815-
Modal Logics with Hard Diamond-free Fragments
We investigate the complexity of modal satisfiability for certain
combinations of modal logics. In particular we examine four examples of
multimodal logics with dependencies and demonstrate that even if we restrict
our inputs to diamond-free formulas (in negation normal form), these logics
still have a high complexity. This result illustrates that having D as one or
more of the combined logics, as well as the interdependencies among logics can
be important sources of complexity even in the absence of diamonds and even
when at the same time in our formulas we allow only one propositional variable.
We then further investigate and characterize the complexity of the
diamond-free, 1-variable fragments of multimodal logics in a general setting.Comment: New version: improvements and corrections according to reviewers'
comments. Accepted at LFCS 201
Reasoning About Knowledge of Unawareness
Awareness has been shown to be a useful addition to standard epistemic logic
for many applications. However, standard propositional logics for knowledge and
awareness cannot express the fact that an agent knows that there are facts of
which he is unaware without there being an explicit fact that the agent knows
he is unaware of. We propose a logic for reasoning about knowledge of
unawareness, by extending Fagin and Halpern's \emph{Logic of General
Awareness}. The logic allows quantification over variables, so that there is a
formula in the language that can express the fact that ``an agent explicitly
knows that there exists a fact of which he is unaware''. Moreover, that formula
can be true without the agent explicitly knowing that he is unaware of any
particular formula. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the
logic, using standard axioms from the literature to capture the quantification
operator. Finally, we show that the validity problem for the logic is
recursively enumerable, but not decidable.Comment: 32 page
A New General Method to Generate Random Modal Formulae for Testing Decision Procedures
The recent emergence of heavily-optimized modal decision procedures has highlighted the key role of empirical testing in this domain. Unfortunately, the introduction of extensive empirical tests for modal logics is recent, and so far none of the proposed test generators is very satisfactory. To cope with this fact, we present a new random generation method that provides benefits over previous methods for generating empirical tests. It fixes and much generalizes one of the best-known methods, the random CNF_[]m test, allowing for generating a much wider variety of problems, covering in principle the whole input space. Our new method produces much more suitable test sets for the current generation of modal decision procedures. We analyze the features of the new method by means of an extensive collection of empirical tests
Does Treewidth Help in Modal Satisfiability?
Many tractable algorithms for solving the Constraint Satisfaction Problem
(CSP) have been developed using the notion of the treewidth of some graph
derived from the input CSP instance. In particular, the incidence graph of the
CSP instance is one such graph. We introduce the notion of an incidence graph
for modal logic formulae in a certain normal form. We investigate the
parameterized complexity of modal satisfiability with the modal depth of the
formula and the treewidth of the incidence graph as parameters. For various
combinations of Euclidean, reflexive, symmetric and transitive models, we show
either that modal satisfiability is FPT, or that it is W[1]-hard. In
particular, modal satisfiability in general models is FPT, while it is
W[1]-hard in transitive models. As might be expected, modal satisfiability in
transitive and Euclidean models is FPT.Comment: Full version of the paper appearing in MFCS 2010. Change from v1:
improved section 5 to avoid exponential blow-up in formula siz