70 research outputs found
Characterizing the NP-PSPACE Gap in the Satisfiability Problem for Modal Logic
There has been a great of work on characterizing the complexity of the
satisfiability and validity problem for modal logics. In particular, Ladner
showed that the validity problem for all logics between K, T, and S4 is {\sl
PSPACE}-complete, while for S5 it is {\sl NP}-complete. We show that, in a
precise sense, it is \emph{negative introspection}, the axiom \neg K p \rimp K
\neg K p, that causes the gap. In a precise sense, if we require this axiom,
then the satisfiability problem is {\sl NP}-complete; without it, it is {\sl
PSPACE}-complete.Comment: 6 page
Complexity of the interpretability logic IL
We show that the decision problem for the basic system of interpretability
logic IL is PSPACE-complete. For this purpose we present an algorithm which
uses polynomial space with respect to the complexity of a given formula. The
existence of such algorithm, together with the previously known PSPACE hardness
of the closed fragment of IL, implies PSPACE-completeness.Comment: 7 page
A \textsf{C++} reasoner for the description logic \shdlssx (Extended Version)
We present an ongoing implementation of a \ke\space based reasoner for a
decidable fragment of stratified elementary set theory expressing the
description logic \dlssx (shortly \shdlssx). The reasoner checks the
consistency of \shdlssx-knowledge bases (KBs) represented in set-theoretic
terms. It is implemented in \textsf{C++} and supports \shdlssx-KBs serialized
in the OWL/XML format. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt
to implement a reasoner for the consistency checking of a description logic
represented via a fragment of set theory that can also classify standard OWL
ontologies.Comment: 15 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1702.03096,
arXiv:1804.1122
Complexity of validity for propositional dependence logics
We study the validity problem for propositional dependence logic, modal
dependence logic and extended modal dependence logic. We show that the validity
problem for propositional dependence logic is NEXPTIME-complete. In addition,
we establish that the corresponding problem for modal dependence logic and
extended modal dependence logic is NEXPTIME-hard and in NEXPTIME^NP.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
Complexity Results for Modal Dependence Logic
Modal dependence logic was introduced recently by V\"a\"an\"anen. It enhances
the basic modal language by an operator =(). For propositional variables
p_1,...,p_n, =(p_1,...,p_(n-1);p_n) intuitively states that the value of p_n is
determined by those of p_1,...,p_(n-1). Sevenster (J. Logic and Computation,
2009) showed that satisfiability for modal dependence logic is complete for
nondeterministic exponential time. In this paper we consider fragments of modal
dependence logic obtained by restricting the set of allowed propositional
connectives. We show that satisfibility for poor man's dependence logic, the
language consisting of formulas built from literals and dependence atoms using
conjunction, necessity and possibility (i.e., disallowing disjunction), remains
NEXPTIME-complete. If we only allow monotone formulas (without negation, but
with disjunction), the complexity drops to PSPACE-completeness. We also extend
V\"a\"an\"anen's language by allowing classical disjunction besides dependence
disjunction and show that the satisfiability problem remains NEXPTIME-complete.
If we then disallow both negation and dependence disjunction, satistiability is
complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. In this way we
completely classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem
for all restrictions of propositional and dependence operators considered by
V\"a\"an\"anen and Sevenster.Comment: 22 pages, full version of CSL 2010 pape
A Team Based Variant of CTL
We introduce two variants of computation tree logic CTL based on team
semantics: an asynchronous one and a synchronous one. For both variants we
investigate the computational complexity of the satisfiability as well as the
model checking problem. The satisfiability problem is shown to be
EXPTIME-complete. Here it does not matter which of the two semantics are
considered. For model checking we prove a PSPACE-completeness for the
synchronous case, and show P-completeness for the asynchronous case.
Furthermore we prove several interesting fundamental properties of both
semantics.Comment: TIME 2015 conference version, modified title and motiviatio
- …