A synchronous program algebra: a basis for reasoning about shared-memory and event-based concurrency

This research started with an algebra for reasoning about rely/guarantee concurrency for a shared memory model. The approach taken led to a more abstract algebra of atomic steps, in which atomic steps synchronise (rather than interleave) when composed in parallel. The algebra of rely/guarantee concurrency then becomes an instantiation of the more abstract algebra. Many of the core properties needed for rely/guarantee reasoning can be shown to hold in the abstract algebra where their proofs are simpler and hence allow a higher degree of automation. The algebra has been encoded in Isabelle/HOL to provide a basis for tool support for program verification. In rely/guarantee concurrency, programs are specified to guarantee certain behaviours until assumptions about the behaviour of their environment are violated. When assumptions are violated, program behaviour is unconstrained (aborting), and guarantees need no longer hold. To support these guarantees a second synchronous operator, weak conjunction, was introduced: both processes in a weak conjunction must agree to take each atomic step, unless one aborts in which case the whole aborts. In developing the laws for parallel and weak conjunction we found many properties were shared by the operators and that the proofs of many laws were essentially the same. This insight led to the idea of generalising synchronisation to an abstract operator with only the axioms that are shared by the parallel and weak conjunction operator, so that those two operators can be viewed as instantiations of the abstract synchronisation operator. The main differences between parallel and weak conjunction are how they combine individual atomic steps; that is left open in the axioms for the abstract operator.Comment: Extended version of a Formal Methods 2016 paper, "An algebra of synchronous atomic steps

A synchronous program algebra: a basis for reasoning about shared-memory and event-based concurrency

This research started with an algebra for reasoning about rely/guarantee concurrency for a shared memory model. The approach taken led to a more abstract algebra of atomic steps, in which atomic steps synchronise (rather than interleave) when composed in parallel. The algebra of rely/guarantee concurrency then becomes an instantiation of the more abstract algebra. Many of the core properties needed for rely/guarantee reasoning can be shown to hold in the abstract algebra where their proofs are simpler and hence allow a higher degree of automation. The algebra has been encoded in Isabelle/HOL to provide a basis for tool support for program verification. In rely/guarantee concurrency, programs are specified to guarantee certain behaviours until assumptions about the behaviour of their environment are violated. When assumptions are violated, program behaviour is unconstrained (aborting), and guarantees need no longer hold. To support these guarantees a second synchronous operator, weak conjunction, was introduced: both processes in a weak conjunction must agree to take each atomic step, unless one aborts in which case the whole aborts. In developing the laws for parallel and weak conjunction we found many properties were shared by the operators and that the proofs of many laws were essentially the same. This insight led to the idea of generalising synchronisation to an abstract operator with only the axioms that are shared by the parallel and weak conjunction operator, so that those two operators can be viewed as instantiations of the abstract synchronisation operator. The main differences between parallel and weak conjunction are how they combine individual atomic steps; that is left open in the axioms for the abstract operator.Comment: Extended version of a Formal Methods 2016 paper, "An algebra of synchronous atomic steps

From Logical to Distributional Models

The paper relates two variants of semantic models for natural language, logical functional models and compositional distributional vector space models, by transferring the logic and reasoning from the logical to the distributional models. The geometrical operations of quantum logic are reformulated as algebraic operations on vectors. A map from functional models to vector space models makes it possible to compare the meaning of sentences word by word.Comment: In Proceedings QPL 2013, arXiv:1412.791

Algebraic verification of hybrid systems in Isabelle/HOL

The thesis describes an open modular semantic framework for the verification of hybrid systems in a general-purpose proof assistant. We follow this approach to create the first algebraic based verification components for hybrid systems in Isabelle/HOL. The framework benefits from various design choices. Firstly, an algebra for programs such as Kleene algebras with tests or modal Kleene algebras captures the verification condition generation by providing rules for each programming construct. Intermediate relational or state transformer semantics instantiated to a concrete model of the program store allow the framework to handle assignments and ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The verification rules for ODEs require user-provided solutions, differential invariants or analytical descriptions of the continuous dynamics of the system. The construction is a shallow embedding which makes the approach quickly extensible and modular. Taking advantage of these features, we derive differential Hoare logic (dH), a minimalistic logic for the verification of hybrid systems, and the differential refinement calculus (dR) for their stepwise construction. Yet the approach is not limited to these formalisms. We also present a hybrid weakest liberal precondition calculus based on predicate transformers which subsumes powerful deductive verification approaches like differential dynamic logic. The framework is also compositional: we combine it with lenses to vary the model of the program store. We also support it with a formalisation of affine and linear systems of ordinary differential equations in Isabelle/HOL. This integration simplifies various certifications that the proof assistant requires such as guarantees of existence and uniqueness of the corresponding solutions. Verification examples illustrate the approach at work. Formalisations of our solutions to problems of the international friendly competition ARCH2020, where our components participated, further evidence their effectiveness. Finally, a larger case study certifying an invariant for a PID controller of the roll angle in a quadcopter’s flight complements these verifications