Systematizing Decentralization and Privacy: Lessons from 15 Years of Research and Deployments

Decentralized systems are a subset of distributed systems where multiple authorities control different components and no authority is fully trusted by all. This implies that any component in a decentralized system is potentially adversarial. We revise fifteen years of research on decentralization and privacy, and provide an overview of key systems, as well as key insights for designers of future systems. We show that decentralized designs can enhance privacy, integrity, and availability but also require careful trade-offs in terms of system complexity, properties provided, and degree of decentralization. These trade-offs need to be understood and navigated by designers. We argue that a combination of insights from cryptography, distributed systems, and mechanism design, aligned with the development of adequate incentives, are necessary to build scalable and successful privacy-preserving decentralized systems

Improving Dependability of Networks with Penalty and Revocation Mechanisms

Both malicious and non-malicious faults can dismantle computer networks. Thus, mitigating faults at various layers is essential in ensuring efficient and fair network resource utilization. In this thesis we take a step in this direction and study several ways to deal with faults by means of penalties and revocation mechanisms in networks that are lacking a centralized coordination point, either because of their scale or design. Compromised nodes can pose a serious threat to infrastructure, end-hosts and services. Such malicious elements can undermine the availability and fairness of networked systems. To deal with such nodes, we design and analyze protocols enabling their removal from the network in a fast and a secure way. We design these protocols for two different environments. In the former setting, we assume that there are multiple, but independent trusted points in the network which coordinate other nodes in the network. In the latter, we assume that all nodes play equal roles in the network and thus need to cooperate to carry out common functionality. We analyze these solutions and discuss possible deployment scenarios. Next we turn our attention to wireless edge networks. In this context, some nodes, without being malicious, can still behave in an unfair manner. To deal with the situation, we propose several self-penalty mechanisms. We implement the proposed protocols employing a commodity hardware and conduct experiments in real-world environments. The analysis of data collected in several measurement rounds revealed improvements in terms of higher fairness and throughput. We corroborate the results with simulations and an analytic model. And finally, we discuss how to measure fairness in dynamic settings, where nodes can have heterogeneous resource demands

Security of 5G-V2X: Technologies, Standardization and Research Directions

Cellular-Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) aims at resolving issues pertaining to the traditional usability of Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) networking. Specifically, C-V2X lowers the number of entities involved in vehicular communications and allows the inclusion of cellular-security solutions to be applied to V2X. For this, the evolvement of LTE-V2X is revolutionary, but it fails to handle the demands of high throughput, ultra-high reliability, and ultra-low latency alongside its security mechanisms. To counter this, 5G-V2X is considered as an integral solution, which not only resolves the issues related to LTE-V2X but also provides a function-based network setup. Several reports have been given for the security of 5G, but none of them primarily focuses on the security of 5G-V2X. This article provides a detailed overview of 5G-V2X with a security-based comparison to LTE-V2X. A novel Security Reflex Function (SRF)-based architecture is proposed and several research challenges are presented related to the security of 5G-V2X. Furthermore, the article lays out requirements of Ultra-Dense and Ultra-Secure (UD-US) transmissions necessary for 5G-V2X.Comment: 9 pages, 6 figures, Preprin

Securing the software-defined networking control plane by using control and data dependency techniques

Software-defined networking (SDN) fundamentally changes how network and security practitioners design, implement, and manage their networks. SDN decouples the decision-making about traffic forwarding (i.e., the control plane) from the traffic being forwarded (i.e., the data plane). SDN also allows for network applications, or apps, to programmatically control network forwarding behavior and policy through a logically centralized control plane orchestrated by a set of SDN controllers. As a result of logical centralization, SDN controllers act as network operating systems in the coordination of shared data plane resources and comprehensive security policy implementation. SDN can support network security through the provision of security services and the assurances of policy enforcement. However, SDN’s programmability means that a network’s security considerations are different from those of traditional networks. For instance, an adversary who manipulates the programmable control plane can leverage significant control over the data plane’s behavior. In this dissertation, we demonstrate that the security posture of SDN can be enhanced using control and data dependency techniques that track information flow and enable understanding of application composability, control and data plane decoupling, and control plane insight. We support that statement through investigation of the various ways in which an attacker can use control flow and data flow dependencies to influence the SDN control plane under different threat models. We systematically explore and evaluate the SDN security posture through a combination of runtime, pre-runtime, and post-runtime contributions in both attack development and defense designs. We begin with the development a conceptual accountability framework for SDN. We analyze the extent to which various entities within SDN are accountable to each other, what they are accountable for, mechanisms for assurance about accountability, standards by which accountability is judged, and the consequences of breaching accountability. We discover significant research gaps in SDN’s accountability that impact SDN’s security posture. In particular, the results of applying the accountability framework showed that more control plane attribution is necessary at different layers of abstraction, and that insight motivated the remaining work in this dissertation. Next, we explore the influence of apps in the SDN control plane’s secure operation. We find that existing access control protections that limit what apps can do, such as role-based access controls, prove to be insufficient for preventing malicious apps from damaging control plane operations. The reason is SDN’s reliance on shared network state. We analyze SDN’s shared state model to discover that benign apps can be tricked into acting as “confused deputies”; malicious apps can poison the state used by benign apps, and that leads the benign apps to make decisions that negatively affect the network. That violates an implicit (but unenforced) integrity policy that governs the network’s security. Because of the strong interdependencies among apps that result from SDN’s shared state model, we show that apps can be easily co-opted as “gadgets,” and that allows an attacker who minimally controls one app to make changes to the network state beyond his or her originally granted permissions. We use a data provenance approach to track the lineage of the network state objects by assigning attribution to the set of processes and agents responsible for each control plane object. We design the ProvSDN tool to track API requests from apps as they access the shared network state’s objects, and to check requests against a predefined integrity policy to ensure that low-integrity apps cannot poison high-integrity apps. ProvSDN acts as both a reference monitor and an information flow control enforcement mechanism. Motivated by the strong inter-app dependencies, we investigate whether implicit data plane dependencies affect the control plane’s secure operation too. We find that data plane hosts typically have an outsized effect on the generation of the network state in reactive-based control plane designs. We also find that SDN’s event-based design, and the apps that subscribe to events, can induce dependencies that originate in the data plane and that eventually change forwarding behaviors. That combination gives attackers that are residing on data plane hosts significant opportunities to influence control plane decisions without having to compromise the SDN controller or apps. We design the EventScope tool to automatically identify where such vulnerabilities occur. EventScope clusters apps’ event usage to decide in which cases unhandled events should be handled, statically analyzes controller and app code to understand how events affect control plane execution, and identifies valid control flow paths in which a data plane attacker can reach vulnerable code to cause unintended data plane changes. We use EventScope to discover 14 new vulnerabilities, and we develop exploits that show how such vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to bypass an intended network (i.e., data plane) access control policy. This research direction is critical for SDN security evaluation because such vulnerabilities could be induced by host-based malware campaigns. Finally, although there are classes of vulnerabilities that can be removed prior to deployment, it is inevitable that other classes of attacks will occur that cannot be accounted for ahead of time. In those cases, a network or security practitioner would need to have the right amount of after-the-fact insight to diagnose the root causes of such attacks without being inundated with too much informa- tion. Challenges remain in 1) the modeling of apps and objects, which can lead to overestimation or underestimation of causal dependencies; and 2) the omission of a data plane model that causally links control and data plane activities. We design the PicoSDN tool to mitigate causal dependency modeling challenges, to account for a data plane model through the use of the data plane topology to link activities in the provenance graph, and to account for network semantics to appropriately query and summarize the control plane’s history. We show how prior work can hinder investigations and analysis in SDN-based attacks and demonstrate how PicoSDN can track SDN control plane attacks.Ope