AI Researchers, Video Games Are Your Friends!

If you are an artificial intelligence researcher, you should look to video games as ideal testbeds for the work you do. If you are a video game developer, you should look to AI for the technology that makes completely new types of games possible. This chapter lays out the case for both of these propositions. It asks the question "what can video games do for AI", and discusses how in particular general video game playing is the ideal testbed for artificial general intelligence research. It then asks the question "what can AI do for video games", and lays out a vision for what video games might look like if we had significantly more advanced AI at our disposal. The chapter is based on my keynote at IJCCI 2015, and is written in an attempt to be accessible to a broad audience.Comment: in Studies in Computational Intelligence Studies in Computational Intelligence, Volume 669 2017. Springe

The 2013 Multi-objective Physical Travelling Salesman Problem Competition

This paper presents the game, framework, rules and results of the Multi-objective Physical Travelling Salesman Problem (MO-PTSP) Competition, that was held at the 2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Games (CIG). The MO-PTSP is a real-time game that can be seen as a modification of the Travelling Salesman Problem, where the player controls a ship that must visit a series of waypoints in a maze while minimizing three opposing goals: Time spent, fuel consumed and damage taken. The rankings of the competition are computed using multi-objective concepts, a novel approach in the field of game artificial intelligence competitions. The winning entry of the contest is also explained in detail. This controller is based on the Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm, and employed Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) for parameter tuning

General general game AI

Arguably the grand goal of artificial intelligence research is to produce machines with general intelligence: the capacity to solve multiple problems, not just one. Artificial intelligence (AI) has investigated the general intelligence capacity of machines within the domain of games more than any other domain given the ideal properties of games for that purpose: controlled yet interesting and computationally hard problems. This line of research, however, has so far focused solely on one specific way of which intelligence can be applied to games: playing them. In this paper, we build on the general game-playing paradigm and expand it to cater for all core AI tasks within a game design process. That includes general player experience and behavior modeling, general non-player character behavior, general AI-assisted tools, general level generation and complete game generation. The new scope for general general game AI beyond game-playing broadens the applicability and capacity of AI algorithms and our understanding of intelligence as tested in a creative domain that interweaves problem solving, art, and engineering.peer-reviewe

Predicting Dominance Rankings for Score-Based Games

Game competitions may involve different player roles and be score-based rather than win/loss based. This raises the issue of how best to draw opponents for matches in ongoing competitions, and how best to rank the players in each role. An example is the Ms Pac-Man versus Ghosts Competition which requires competitors to develop software controllers to take charge of the game's protagonists: participants may develop software controllers for either or both Ms Pac-Man and the team of four ghosts. In this paper, we compare two ranking schemes for win-loss games, Bayes Elo and Glicko. We convert the game into one of win-loss ("dominance") by matching controllers of identical type against the same opponent in a series of pair-wise comparisons. This implicitly creates a "solution concept" as to what a constitutes a good player. We analyze how many games are needed under two popular ranking algorithms, Glicko and Bayes Elo, before one can infer the strength of the players, according to our proposed solution concept, without performing an exhaustive evaluation. We show that Glicko should be the method of choice for online score-based game competitions