25 research outputs found

    The physiological stress response of salmonids: considerations for field procedures and environmental monitoring

    Get PDF
    Investigating the physiological state of wild salmonids is challenging on many levels. The sensitive nature of an integrated physiological stress response directs how biological data is collected in the field and, consequently, how the results are interpreted. This thesis is comprised of two main components. The first component encompasses laboratory-based studies addressing the potential confounding effects of: 1) anaesthesia with either tricaine methanesulphonate (tricaine) or clove oil (eugenol) prior to blood/tissue sampling, and 2) capture by electroshocking, on the immediate and short-term responses of plasma/serum cortisol and glucose concentrations, haematocrit, plasma/serum lysozyme activity, and total leucocyte abundance in juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). The second component involves a field-based exploration of the in situ physiological status, using the same five physiological traits, of wild bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Torpy River watershed, B.C., in relation to selected habitat attributes (stream gradient, discharge rate, and riparian canopy-closure). Anaesthetization and electroshocking did not significantly alter values for the five physiological traits provided that post-capture blood sampling occurred immediately. Tricaine and clove oil immobilization produced similar effects on the physiological stress response of juvenile chinook salmon. Clove oil (eugenol) shows promise as a viable and safe alternative to tricaine for aquacultural purposes and in laboratory- and field-based research. Electroshocking is an acute stressor from which juvenile chinook salmon can recover physiologically (usually within 12-24 h). Handling without shocking, however, significantly reduced serum lysozyme activity for up to 2 wks post-stress. Radiographs indicated that while some degree of spinal abnormality exists naturally in domestic chinook juveniles, individuals exposed to a single brief shock incur significantly more spinal deformities. Some of the variation in the stress physiology and non-specific immune function of wild bull trout in the Torpy River system were explained by the combined effects of stream gradient, discharge rate, and riparian canopy-closure. The physiological measurements of wild bull trout generally did not differ from those reported in the literature for other salmonid species. The "background" effects of these habitat features on the physiology of wild salmonids must be considered when interpreting field-collected data.The original print copy of this thesis may be available here: http://wizard.unbc.ca/record=b120573

    Physiological effects of the parasite ichthyophonus on spawning chinook salmon and their offspring in a Yukon River tributary

    Get PDF
    Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2015In recent years, Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha returns to the Yukon River, Alaska, have been substantially reduced. In summer 2010-2012, spawning Chinook salmon (n=51, 32, and 23, respectively) were collected from the Salcha River, a tributary of the Yukon River, to determine the effects of Ichthyophonus, a protozoan parasite, on salmon reproductive success. Eggs and milt from Ichthyophonus-infected and non-infected parents were collected in 2010 and cross-fertilized to investigate offspring survival and potential second-generation effects induced by the parasite. Proximate composition analysis of adult muscle, eggs, and alevins, and blood chemistry analysis of adult blood plasma and alevin whole body homogenates were analyzed to explore potential differences between Ichthyophonus-infected and non-infected salmon. Ichthyophonus infection prevalence was 7.8, 6.3, and 8.3 % in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Egg lipid content was significantly higher in eggs from Ichthyophonus-infected females, compared to eggs from Ichthyophonus-negative females. Survival of fertilized eggs to hatching was not significantly different between offspring from Ichthyophonus-infected parents (Mean±1SD: 24.4±29.8 % survival) and non-infected parents (41.0±24.8 % survival). Proximate composition (% lipid, % protein, kJ/g) of muscle from spawning adult salmon also did not differ, nor did total body composition or morphology of alevins produced by either Ichthyophonus-infected or non-infected parents. We found no significant differences in blood plasma cortisol concentrations (a stress indicator) between Ichthyophonus-positive and negative adults or their offspring. There were also no significant differences in blood chemistry parameters indicative of tissue damage between Ichthyophonus-positive and Ichthyophonus-negative adults or resulting alevins, with the exception of aspartate aminotransferase, which was unexpectedly higher in plasma of Ichthyophonus-negative adults. Overall, infection with Ichthyophonus does not appear to impact the spawning ability or spawning success of Chinook salmon in the Salcha River

    Assessment of injury to New Zealand native fish by boat electrofishing

    Get PDF
    This study investigated the survival, incidence and severity of injuries and physiological reactions to stress caused by boat electrofishing in comparison with standard netting techniques in three New Zealand native fish species. Shortfin eel (Anguilla australis), grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) and common smelt (Retropinna retropinna) were captured from the Waikato River and its surrounding lakes with standardised boat electrofishing techniques (60-Hz pulsed direct current, 45-60% of range with the 0-500-V peak voltage machine setting, 3-4 Amps root mean square output). Fish were captured in water of 133-154 μScm─1 ambient conductivity at 18-21oC. Capture techniques used for comparison were fyke netting for eels, gill netting for grey mullet and beach seine netting for smelt. Survival was assessed in eels that held for 30 days after capture and smelt that were held for 30 min after capture. Several different methods were used to assess the incidence and severity of injuries. External examinations were used to assess branding and abrasions, and internal injuries were assessed by radiographic imaging and bilateral filleting to reveal haemorrhaging and spinal damage. Finally, physiological stress was determined by an analysis of haematocrit and haemoglobin concentration and an analysis of blood plasma ions (sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium). Survival over 30 days of shortfin eels captured by electrofishing (92% for Lake Areare eels and 96% for Lake Rotongaro eels) was similar to that for fyke netting (92% for Lake Areare and 88% for Lake Rotongaro). Two eels appeared to have died from fungal infections as no haemorrhaging or spinal injuries were apparent among the mortalities. External examinations revealed that no abrasions or branding occurred in eels captured by electrofishing; however, abrasions occurred in eels captured by fyke netting (24% for Lake Areare eels and 16% for Lake Rotongaro eels). Rates of internal haemorrhaging immediately after electrofishing were inconsistent (0% in Lake Areare and 28% in Lake Rotongaro); in Lake Rotongaro, this was significantly greater than those captured by fyke netting, in which only 8% had haemorrhages. No haemorrhaging was observed in eels after 30 days from Lake Areare. Haemorrhages from electrofishing in our study appeared to heal within the 30-day holding period, as the incidence of haemorrhaging in Rotongaro eels reduced from 28% at capture to only 4% after 30 days in captivity. Rates of spinal injury in eels captured by electrofishing was also variable (12% in Lake Areare eels and 8% in Lake Rotongaro eels), compared to the rate of spinal injury in eels captured by fyke netting (0% in Lake Areare eels and 4% in Lake Rotongaro eels). The upper rate of haemorrhaging that we found for electrofishing in shortfin eels (28%) was similar to injury rates for electrofished American eels (25%), but our rates of spinal damage (8-12%) were much lower than for American eels (60%). In grey mullet, there was no significant difference (P > 0.101) in the occurrence of haemorrhages or spinal injuries between the two capture methods. However, physiological stress from electrofishing caused a significantly (t = 2.37, P = 0.02) reduced sodium ion concentration (139.38 ± 13.24 mM) compared to that of gill netting (149.06 ± 15.58 mM). Electrofishing also caused a significantly (t = 4.61, P < 0.001) lower concentration of haemoglobin (86.55 ± 9.21 g L-1) compared to that of grey mullet captured by gill netting (108.81 ± 23.86 g L-1). However, there were no significant differences between capture methods for the other blood plasma constituents tested (haematocrit and the blood plasma ions sodium, potassium, magnesium and calcium). Survival was high in smelt captured by both electrofishing (94.8%, n = 1217) and by seine netting (92.9%, n = 1271), with no statistically significant difference between the two fishing methods (t = −1.021, P = 0.320). In a subsample of smelt analysed for injuries (n = 40 for each method), external injuries were observed in 15% (n = 6) of smelt captured by electrofishing and in 20% (n = 8) of smelt captured by seine netting. No haemorrhages were detected in smelt for either of the capture methods and there was no significant difference (G = 0.215, P = 0.642) in the rate of spinal injuries in smelt captured by electrofishing (10%, n = 4) or by seine netting (5%, n = 2). These results suggest that boat electrofishing as practiced in New Zealand is in the long term generally no more harmful to shortfin eels, grey mullet, and common smelt than other comparable capture sampling techniques. Exceptions to this conclusion were increased haemorrhaging in electrofished shortfin eels, from which they recovered within 30 days, and reduced sodium and haemoglobin concentrations in electrofished grey mullet, which are signs of physiological stress. All fishing methods examined caused some level of injury, stress, or mortality in the three species studied. Netting techniques (fyke net, gill netting, and seine netting) that are commonly used will also cause harm and these techniques are currently used far more widely than boat electrofishing

    Biological data and model development for management of longfinned eels

    Get PDF
    Objectives: 1. Estimate population parameters required for a management model. These include survival, density, age structure, growth, age and size at maturity and at recruitment to the adult eel fishery. Estimate their variability among individuals in a range of habitats. 2. Develop a management population dynamics model and use it to investigate management options. 3. Establish baseline data and sustainability indicators for long-term monitoring. 4. Assess the applicability of the above techniques to other eel fisheries in Australia, in collaboration with NSW. Distribute developed tools via the Australia and New Zealand Eel Reference Group

    Biological data and model development for management of longfinned eels

    Get PDF
    Objectives: 1. Estimate population parameters required for a management model. These include survival, density, age structure, growth, age and size at maturity and at recruitment to the adult eel fishery. Estimate their variability among individuals in a range of habitats. 2. Develop a management population dynamics model and use it to investigate management options. 3. Establish baseline data and sustainability indicators for long-term monitoring. 4. Assess the applicability of the above techniques to other eel fisheries in Australia, in collaboration with NSW. Distribute developed tools via the Australia and New Zealand Eel Reference Group

    Welfare Indicators for farmed Atlantic salmon: tools for assessing fish welfare

    Get PDF
    Fish welfare is a key issue in commercial farming and is central to many decisions that farmers take during their daily husbandry practices and longer term production planning. It is also a prominent topic for NGO’s, animal welfare organisations and charities, regulatory bodies, policy makers and consumers. Farmers have long been interested in optimising the welfare of their animals and actively employ strategies that address fish welfare concerns and attempt to minimise threats to fish welfare. Independent third party organisations have even developed fish welfare standards and certification schemes for certain aquaculture species (e.g. RSPCA welfare standards for farmed Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout, RSPCA, 2018a, b). The topic of fish welfare has also been covered in numerous aquaculture research and review papers over the years, both from a fundamental and also applied perspective. This wealth of information and documentation can be spread over a wide range of sources that may not be easily accessible for the farmer and other end users. In many cases the wealth of information requires interpretation and re-presentation before it is suitable for use out on the farm. Once the farmer has information on fish welfare, they need to implement it in their production systems and daily husbandry practices. This can be a serious challenge as even measuring fish welfare can be challenging and the tools available for measurement may not be suitable for all species or all life stages. To assess the overall welfare status of the fish we use Welfare Indicators (WIs). Welfare indicators can either be direct animal-based (something you get from the fish), or indirect resource-based (e.g. rearing environment, infrastructure etc.). However, some WIs may be too complex or too difficult to apply on a farm. WIs that are appropriate for on-farm use are termed Operational Welfare Indicators (OWIs). WIs that can be sampled on the farms, but need to be sent to a laboratory or other remote analytical facility are termed Laboratory-based Welfare Indicators (LABWIs). There are other potential WIs that cannot currently be classified as either OWIs or LABWIs, these are mainly used in research but may be useful in the future or under specific circumstances at present. From the suite of appropriate OWIs or LABWIs available, the end user then needs to apply these to different production systems and husbandry routines. This is the goal of this handbook – to assemble a farm-friendly toolbox of fit for purpose Operational Welfare Indicators (OWIs) and Laboratory-based Welfare Indicators (LABWIs) for use out on fish farms in different production systems and husbandry routines. It also includes advice on their implementation and interpretation

    Welfare Indicators for farmed Atlantic salmon : tools for assessing fish welfare

    Get PDF
    publishedVersio
    corecore