Abstraction of Elementary Hybrid Systems by Variable Transformation

Elementary hybrid systems (EHSs) are those hybrid systems (HSs) containing elementary functions such as exp, ln, sin, cos, etc. EHSs are very common in practice, especially in safety-critical domains. Due to the non-polynomial expressions which lead to undecidable arithmetic, verification of EHSs is very hard. Existing approaches based on partition of state space or over-approximation of reachable sets suffer from state explosion or inflation of numerical errors. In this paper, we propose a symbolic abstraction approach that reduces EHSs to polynomial hybrid systems (PHSs), by replacing all non-polynomial terms with newly introduced variables. Thus the verification of EHSs is reduced to the one of PHSs, enabling us to apply all the well-established verification techniques and tools for PHSs to EHSs. In this way, it is possible to avoid the limitations of many existing methods. We illustrate the abstraction approach and its application in safety verification of EHSs by several real world examples

Relating Syntactic and Semantic Perturbations of Hybrid Automata

We investigate how the semantics of a hybrid automaton deviates with respect to syntactic perturbations on the hybrid automaton. We consider syntactic perturbations of a hybrid automaton, wherein the syntactic representations of its elements, namely, initial sets, invariants, guards, and flows, in some logic are perturbed. Our main result establishes a continuity like property that states that small perturbations in the syntax lead to small perturbations in the semantics. More precisely, we show that for every real number epsilon>0 and natural number k, there is a real number delta>0 such that H^delta, the delta syntactic perturbation of a hybrid automaton H, is epsilon-simulation equivalent to H up to k transition steps. As a byproduct, we obtain a proof that a bounded safety verification tool such as dReach will eventually prove the safety of a safe hybrid automaton design (when only non-strict inequalities are used in all constraints) if dReach iteratively reduces the syntactic parameter delta that is used in checking approximate satisfiability. This has an immediate application in counter-example validation in a CEGAR framework, namely, when a counter-example is spurious, then we have a complete procedure for deducing the same

Hybrid Automata in Systems Biology: How far can we go?

We consider the reachability problem on semi-algebraic hybrid automata. In particular, we deal with the effective cost that has to be afforded to solve reachability through first-order satisfiability. The analysis we perform with some existing tools shows that even simple examples cannot be efficiently solved. We need approximations to reduce the number of variables in our formulae: this is the main source of time computation growth. We study standard approximation methods based on Taylor polynomials and ad-hoc strategies to solve the problem and we show their effectiveness on the repressilator case study

Approximate Equivalence of the Hybrid Automata with Taylor Theory

Hybrid automaton is a formal model for precisely describing a hybrid system in which the computational processes interact with the physical ones. The reachability analysis of the polynomial hybrid automaton is decidable, which makes the Taylor approximation of a hybrid automaton applicable and valuable. In this paper, we studied the simulation relation among the hybrid automaton and its Taylor approximation, as well as the approximate equivalence relation. We also proved that the Taylor approximation simulates its original hybrid automaton, and similar hybrid automata could be compared quantitatively, for example, the approximate equivalence we proposed in the paper

Taylor Approximation for Hybrid Systems

AbstractWe propose a new approximation technique for Hybrid Automata. Given any Hybrid Automaton H, we call Approx(H,k) the Polynomial Hybrid Automaton obtained by approximating each formula ϕ in H with the formulae ϕk obtained by replacing the functions in ϕ with their Taylor polynomial of degree k. We prove that Approx(H,k) is an over-approximation of H. We study the conditions ensuring that, given any ϵ>0, some k0 exists such that, for all k>k0, the “distance” between any vector satisfying ϕk and at least one vector satisfying ϕ is less than ϵ. We study also conditions ensuring that, given any ϵ>0, some k0 exists such that, for all k>k0, the “distance” between any configuration reached by Approx(H,k) in n steps and at least one configuration reached by H in n steps is less than ϵ