Local Rademacher Complexity-based Learning Guarantees for Multi-Task Learning

We show a Talagrand-type concentration inequality for Multi-Task Learning (MTL), using which we establish sharp excess risk bounds for MTL in terms of distribution- and data-dependent versions of the Local Rademacher Complexity (LRC). We also give a new bound on the LRC for norm regularized as well as strongly convex hypothesis classes, which applies not only to MTL but also to the standard i.i.d. setting. Combining both results, one can now easily derive fast-rate bounds on the excess risk for many prominent MTL methods, including---as we demonstrate---Schatten-norm, group-norm, and graph-regularized MTL. The derived bounds reflect a relationship akeen to a conservation law of asymptotic convergence rates. This very relationship allows for trading off slower rates w.r.t. the number of tasks for faster rates with respect to the number of available samples per task, when compared to the rates obtained via a traditional, global Rademacher analysis.Comment: In this version, some arguments and results (of the previous version) have been corrected, or modifie

Improved Multi-Task Learning Based on Local Rademacher Analysis

Considering a single prediction task at a time is the most commonly paradigm in machine learning practice. This methodology, however, ignores the potentially relevant information that might be available in other related tasks in the same domain. This becomes even more critical where facing the lack of a sufficient amount of data in a prediction task of an individual subject may lead to deteriorated generalization performance. In such cases, learning multiple related tasks together might offer a better performance by allowing tasks to leverage information from each other. Multi-Task Learning (MTL) is a machine learning framework, which learns multiple related tasks simultaneously to overcome data scarcity limitations of Single Task Learning (STL), and therefore, it results in an improved performance. Although MTL has been actively investigated by the machine learning community, there are only a few studies examining the theoretical justification of this learning framework. The focus of previous studies is on providing learning guarantees in the form of generalization error bounds. The study of generalization bounds is considered as an important problem in machine learning, and, more specifically, in statistical learning theory. This importance is twofold: (1) generalization bounds provide an upper-tail confidence interval for the true risk of a learning algorithm the latter of which cannot be precisely calculated due to its dependency to some unknown distribution P from which the data are drawn, (2) this type of bounds can also be employed as model selection tools, which lead to identifying more accurate learning models. The generalization error bounds are typically expressed in terms of the empirical risk of the learning hypothesis along with a complexity measure of that hypothesis. Although different complexity measures can be used in deriving error bounds, Rademacher complexity has received considerable attention in recent years, due to its superiority to other complexity measures. In fact, Rademacher complexity can potentially lead to tighter error bounds compared to the ones obtained by other complexity measures. However, one shortcoming of the general notion of Rademacher complexity is that it provides a global complexity estimate of the learning hypothesis space, which does not take into consideration the fact that learning algorithms, by design, select functions belonging to a more favorable subset of this space and, therefore, they yield better performing models than the worst case. To overcome the limitation of global Rademacher complexity, a more nuanced notion of Rademacher complexity, the so-called local Rademacher complexity, has been considered, which leads to sharper learning bounds, and as such, compared to its global counterpart, guarantees faster convergence rates in terms of number of samples. Also, considering the fact that locally-derived bounds are expected to be tighter than globally-derived ones, they can motivate better (more accurate) model selection algorithms. While the previous MTL studies provide generalization bounds based on some other complexity measures, in this dissertation, we prove excess risk bounds for some popular kernel-based MTL hypothesis spaces based on the Local Rademacher Complexity (LRC) of those hypotheses. We show that these local bounds have faster convergence rates compared to the previous Global Rademacher Complexity (GRC)-based bounds. We then use our LRC-based MTL bounds to design a new kernel-based MTL model, which enjoys strong learning guarantees. Moreover, we develop an optimization algorithm to solve our new MTL formulation. Finally, we run simulations on experimental data that compare our MTL model to some classical Multi-Task Multiple Kernel Learning (MT-MKL) models designed based on the GRCs. Since the local Rademacher complexities are expected to be tighter than the global ones, our new model is also expected to exhibit better performance compared to the GRC-based models

Algorithm-dependent generalization bounds for multi-task learning

Often, tasks are collected for multi-task learning (MTL) because they share similar feature structures. Based on this observation, in this paper, we present novel algorithm-dependent generalization bounds for MTL by exploiting the notion of algorithmic stability. We focus on the performance of one particular task and the average performance over multiple tasks by analyzing the generalization 1 ability of a common parameter that is shared in MTL. When focusing on one particular task, with the help of a mild assumption on the feature structures, we interpret the function of the other tasks as a regularizer that produces a specific inductive bias. The algorithm for learning the common parameter, as well as the predictor, is thereby uniformly stable with respect to the domain of the particular task and has a generalization bound with a fast convergence rate of order O(1=n), where n is the sample size of the particular task. When focusing on the average performance over multiple tasks, we prove that a similar inductive bias exists under certain conditions on the feature structures. Thus, the corresponding algorithm for learning the common parameter is also uniformly stable with respect to the domains of the multiple tasks, and its generalization bound is of the order O(1=T ), where T is the number of tasks. These theoretical analyses naturally show that the similarity of feature structures in MTL will lead to specific regularizations for predicting, which enables the learning algorithms to generalize fast and correctly from a few examples

High dimensional inference: structured sparse models and non-linear measurement channels

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston UniversityHigh dimensional inference is motivated by many real life problems such as medical diagnosis, security, and marketing. In statistical inference problems, n data samples are collected where each sample contains p attributes. High dimensional inference deals with problems in which the number of parameters, p, is larger than the sample size, n. To hope for any consistent result within high dimensional framework, data is assumed to lie on a low dimensional manifold. This implies that only k « p parameters are required to characterize p feature variables. One way to impose such a low dimensional structure is a regularization based approach. In this approach, statistical inference problem is mapped to an optimization problem in which a regularizer term penalizes the deviation of the model from a specific structure. The choice of appropriate penalizing functions is often challenging. We explore three major problems that arise in the context of this approach. First, we probe the reconstruction problem under sparse Poisson models. We are motivated by applications in explosive identification, and online marketing where the observations are the counts of a recurring event. We study the amplitude effect which distinguishes our problem from a conventional linear regression least squares problem. Motivated by applications in decentralized sensor networks and distributed multi-task learning, we study the effect of decentralization on high dimensional inference. Finally, we provide a general framework to study the impact of multiple structured models on performance of regularization based reconstruction methods. For each of the afore- mentioned scenarios, we propose an equivalent optimization problem and specify the conditions under which the optimization problem can be solved. Moreover, we mathematically analyze the performance of such recovery method in terms of reconstruction error, prediction error, probability of successful recovery, and sample complexity