Targeted Automatic Integer Overflow Discovery Using Goal-Directed Conditional Branch Enforcement

We present a new technique and system, DIODE, for auto- matically generating inputs that trigger overflows at memory allocation sites. DIODE is designed to identify relevant sanity checks that inputs must satisfy to trigger overflows at target memory allocation sites, then generate inputs that satisfy these sanity checks to successfully trigger the overflow. DIODE works with off-the-shelf, production x86 binaries. Our results show that, for our benchmark set of applications, and for every target memory allocation site exercised by our seed inputs (which the applications process correctly with no overflows), either 1) DIODE is able to generate an input that triggers an overflow at that site or 2) there is no input that would trigger an overflow for the observed target expression at that site.United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Grant FA8650-11-C-7192

Combining Static Analysis and Targeted Symbolic Execution for Scalable Bug-finding in Application Binaries

Manual software testing is laborious and prone to human error. Yet, it is the most popular method for quality assurance. Automating the test-case generation promises better effectiveness, especially for exposing “deep” corner-case bugs. Symbolic execution is an automated technique for program analysis that has recently become practical due to advances in constraint solvers. It stands out as an automated testing technique that has no false positives, it eventually enumerates all feasible program executions, and can prioritize executions of interest. However, “path explosion”, the fact that the number of program executions is typically at least exponential in the size of the program, hinders the adoption of symbolic execution in the real world, where program commonly reaches millions of lines of code. In this thesis, we present a method for generating test-cases using symbolic execution which reach a given potentially buggy “target” statement. Such a potentially buggy program statement can be found by static program analysis or from crash-reports given by users and serve as input to our technique. The test-case generated by our technique serves as a proof of the bug. Generating crashes at the target statement have many applications including re-producing crashes, checking warnings generated by static program analysis tools, or analysis of source code patches in code review process. By constantly steering the symbolic execution along the branches that are most likely to lead to the target program statement and pruning the search space that are unlikely to reach the target, we were able to detect deep bugs in real programs. To tackle exponential growth of program paths, we propose a new scheme to manage program execution paths without exhausting memory. Experiments on real-life programs demonstrate that our tool WatSym, built on selective symbolic execution engine S2E, can generate crashing inputs in feasible time and order of magnitude better than symbolic approaches (as embodied by S2E) failed

Using honeypots to trace back amplification DDoS attacks

In today’s interconnected world, Denial-of-Service attacks can cause great harm by simply rendering a target system or service inaccessible. Amongst the most powerful and widespread DoS attacks are amplification attacks, in which thousands of vulnerable servers are tricked into reflecting and amplifying attack traffic. However, as these attacks inherently rely on IP spoofing, the true attack source is hidden. Consequently, going after the offenders behind these attacks has so far been deemed impractical. This thesis presents a line of work that enables practical attack traceback supported by honeypot reflectors. To this end, we investigate the tradeoffs between applicability, required a priori knowledge, and traceback granularity in three settings. First, we show how spoofed attack packets and non-spoofed scan packets can be linked using honeypot-induced fingerprints, which allows attributing attacks launched from the same infrastructures as scans. Second, we present a classifier-based approach to trace back attacks launched from booter services after collecting ground-truth data through self-attacks. Third, we propose to use BGP poisoning to locate the attacking network without prior knowledge and even when attack and scan infrastructures are disjoint. Finally, as all of our approaches rely on honeypot reflectors, we introduce an automated end-to-end pipeline to systematically find amplification vulnerabilities and synthesize corresponding honeypots.In der heutigen vernetzten Welt können Denial-of-Service-Angriffe große Schäden verursachen, einfach indem sie ihr Zielsystem unerreichbar machen. Zu den stärksten und verbreitetsten DoS-Angriffen zählen Amplification-Angriffe, bei denen tausende verwundbarer Server missbraucht werden, um Angriffsverkehr zu reflektieren und zu verstärken. Da solche Angriffe jedoch zwingend gefälschte IP-Absenderadressen nutzen, ist die wahre Angriffsquelle verdeckt. Damit gilt die Verfolgung der Täter bislang als unpraktikabel. Diese Dissertation präsentiert eine Reihe von Arbeiten, die praktikable Angriffsrückverfolgung durch den Einsatz von Honeypots ermöglicht. Dazu untersuchen wir das Spannungsfeld zwischen Anwendbarkeit, benötigtem Vorwissen, und Rückverfolgungsgranularität in drei Szenarien. Zuerst zeigen wir, wie gefälschte Angriffs- und ungefälschte Scan-Datenpakete miteinander verknüpft werden können. Dies ermöglicht uns die Rückverfolgung von Angriffen, die ebenfalls von Scan-Infrastrukturen aus durchgeführt wurden. Zweitens präsentieren wir einen Klassifikator-basierten Ansatz um Angriffe durch Booter-Services mittels vorher durch Selbstangriffe gesammelter Daten zurückzuverfolgen. Drittens zeigen wir auf, wie BGP Poisoning genutzt werden kann, um ohne weiteres Vorwissen das angreifende Netzwerk zu ermitteln. Schließlich präsentieren wir einen automatisierten Prozess, um systematisch Schwachstellen zu finden und entsprechende Honeypots zu synthetisieren