Superoptimization of WebAssembly Bytecode

Motivated by the fast adoption of WebAssembly, we propose the first functional pipeline to support the superoptimization of WebAssembly bytecode. Our pipeline works over LLVM and Souper. We evaluate our superoptimization pipeline with 12 programs from the Rosetta code project. Our pipeline improves the code section size of 8 out of 12 programs. We discuss the challenges faced in superoptimization of WebAssembly with two case studies.Comment: 4 pages, 3 figures. Proceedings of MoreVMs: Workshop on Modern Language Runtimes, Ecosystems, and VMs (2020

A General Static Binary Rewriting Framework for WebAssembly

Binary rewriting is a widely adopted technique in software analysis. WebAssembly (Wasm), as an emerging bytecode format, has attracted great attention from our community. Unfortunately, there is no general-purpose binary rewriting framework for Wasm, and existing effort on Wasm binary modification is error-prone and tedious. In this paper, we present BREWasm, the first general purpose static binary rewriting framework for Wasm, which has addressed inherent challenges of Wasm rewriting including high complicated binary structure, strict static syntax verification, and coupling among sections. We perform extensive evaluation on diverse Wasm applications to show the efficiency, correctness and effectiveness of BREWasm. We further show the promising direction of implementing a diverse set of binary rewriting tasks based on BREWasm in an effortless and user-friendly manner

An Evaluation on the Performance of Code Generated with WebAssembly Compilers

WebAssembly is a new technology that is revolutionizing the web. Essentially it is a low-level binary instruction set that can be run on browsers, servers or stand-alone environments. Many programming languages either currently have, or are working on, compilers that will compile the language into WebAssembly. This means that applications written in languages like C++ or Rust can now be run on the web, directly in a browser or other environment. However, as we will highlight in this research, the quality of code generated by the different WebAssembly compilers varies and causes performance issues. This research paper aims to evaluate the code generated by a number of existing WebAssembly compilers in order to determine whether or not there is a significant difference in their performances regarding execution times

Cost Reduction With Guarantees: Formal Reasoning Applied To Blockchain Technologies

Blockchain technologies are moving fast and their distributed nature as well as their high-stake (financial) applications make it crucial to “get things right”. Moreover, blockchain technologies often come with a high cost for maintaining blockchain infrastructure and for running applications. In this thesis formal reasoning is used for guaranteeing correctness while reducing the cost of (i) maintaining the infrastructure by optimising blockchain protocols, and (ii) running applications by optimising blockchain programs—so called smart contracts. Both have a clear cost measure: for protocols the amount of exchanged messages, and for smart contracts the monetary cost of execution. In the first result for blockchain protocols starting from a proof of correctness for an abstract blockchain consensus protocol using infinitely many messages and infinite state, a refinement proof transfers correctness to a concrete implementation of the protocol reducing the cost to finite resources. In the second result I move from a blockchain to a block graph. This block graph embeds the run of a deterministic byzantine fault tolerant protocol, thereby getting parallelism “for free” and reducing the exchanged messages to the point of omission. For blockchain programs, I optimise programs executed on the Ethereum blockchain. As a first result, I use superoptimisation and encode the search for cheaper, but observationally equivalent, program as a search problem for an automated theorem prover. Since solving this search problem is in itself expensive, my second result is an efficient encoding of the search problem. Finally for reusing found optimisations, my third results gives a framework to generate peephole optimisation rules for a smart contract compiler

Optimizing whole programs for code size

Reducing code size has benefits at every scale. It can help fit embedded software into strictly limited storage space, reduce mobile app download time, and improve the cache usage of supercomputer software. There are many optimizations available that reduce code size, but research has often neglected this goal in favor of speed, and some recently developed compiler techniques have not yet been applied for size reduction. My work shows that newly practical compiler techniques can be used to develop novel code size optimizations. These optimizations complement each other, and other existing methods, in minimizing code size. I introduce two new optimizations, Guided Linking and Semantic Outlining, and also present a comparison framework for code size reduction methods that explains how and when my new optimizations work well with other, existing optimizations. Guided Linking builds on recent work that optimizes multiple programs and shared libraries together. It links an arbitrary set of programs and libraries into a single module. The module can then be optimized with arbitrary existing link-time optimizations, without changes to the optimization code, allowing them to work across program and library boundaries; for example, a library function can be inlined into a plugin module. I also demonstrate that deduplicating functions in the merged module can significantly reduce code size in some cases. Guided Linking ensures that all necessary dynamic linker behavior, such as plugin loading, still works correctly; it relies on developer-provided constraints to indicate which behavior must be preserved. Guided Linking can achieve a 13% to 57% size reduction in some scenarios, and can speed up the Python interpreter by 9%. Semantic Outlining relies on the use of automated theorem provers to check semantic equivalence of pieces of code, which has only recently become feasible to perform at scale. It extends outlining, an established technique for deduplicating structurally equivalent pieces of code, to work on code pieces that are semantically equivalent even if their structure is completely different. My comparison framework covers a large number of different code size reduction methods from the literature, in addition to my new methods. It describes several different aspects by which each method can be compared; in particular, there are multiple types of redundancy in program code that can be exploited to reduce code size, and methods that exploit different types of redundancy are likely to work well in combination with each other. This explains why Guided Linking and Semantic Outlining can be effective when used together, along with some kinds of existing optimizations

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2022

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing

Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design – FMCAD 2022

The Conference on Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD) is an annual conference on the theory and applications of formal methods in hardware and system verification. FMCAD provides a leading forum to researchers in academia and industry for presenting and discussing groundbreaking methods, technologies, theoretical results, and tools for reasoning formally about computing systems. FMCAD covers formal aspects of computer-aided system design including verification, specification, synthesis, and testing