62,279 research outputs found
Inquisitive bisimulation
Inquisitive modal logic InqML is a generalisation of standard Kripke-style
modal logic. In its epistemic incarnation, it extends standard epistemic logic
to capture not just the information that agents have, but also the questions
that they are interested in. Technically, InqML fits within the family of
logics based on team semantics. From a model-theoretic perspective, it takes us
a step in the direction of monadic second-order logic, as inquisitive modal
operators involve quantification over sets of worlds. We introduce and
investigate the natural notion of bisimulation equivalence in the setting of
InqML. We compare the expressiveness of InqML and first-order logic in the
context of relational structures with two sorts, one for worlds and one for
information states. We characterise inquisitive modal logic, as well as its
multi-agent epistemic S5-like variant, as the bisimulation invariant fragment
of first-order logic over various natural classes of two-sorted structures.
These results crucially require non-classical methods in studying bisimulation
and first-order expressiveness over non-elementary classes of structures,
irrespective of whether we aim for characterisations in the sense of classical
or of finite model theory
Erotetic Epistemic Logic
This paper presents a logic of questions developed as an extension of (S5) epistemic logic. We discuss many features that are important for erotetic logic (formalization and semantics of questions, answerhood conditions, and inferential structures with questions). The aim is to introduce an erotetic system which corresponds well with epistemic terms and can form an appropriate background for dynamic approaches in epistemic logic
Geometric Aspects of Multiagent Systems
Recent advances in Multiagent Systems (MAS) and Epistemic Logic within
Distributed Systems Theory, have used various combinatorial structures that
model both the geometry of the systems and the Kripke model structure of models
for the logic. Examining one of the simpler versions of these models,
interpreted systems, and the related Kripke semantics of the logic (an
epistemic logic with -agents), the similarities with the geometric /
homotopy theoretic structure of groupoid atlases is striking. These latter
objects arise in problems within algebraic K-theory, an area of algebra linked
to the study of decomposition and normal form theorems in linear algebra. They
have a natural well structured notion of path and constructions of path
objects, etc., that yield a rich homotopy theory.Comment: 14 pages, 1 eps figure, prepared for GETCO200
Some Remarks on the Model Theory of Epistemic Plausibility Models
Classical logics of knowledge and belief are usually interpreted on Kripke
models, for which a mathematically well-developed model theory is available.
However, such models are inadequate to capture dynamic phenomena. Therefore,
epistemic plausibility models have been introduced. Because these are much
richer structures than Kripke models, they do not straightforwardly inherit the
model-theoretical results of modal logic. Therefore, while epistemic
plausibility structures are well-suited for modeling purposes, an extensive
investigation of their model theory has been lacking so far. The aim of the
present paper is to fill exactly this gap, by initiating a systematic
exploration of the model theory of epistemic plausibility models. Like in
'ordinary' modal logic, the focus will be on the notion of bisimulation. We
define various notions of bisimulations (parametrized by a language L) and show
that L-bisimilarity implies L-equivalence. We prove a Hennesy-Milner type
result, and also two undefinability results. However, our main point is a
negative one, viz. that bisimulations cannot straightforwardly be generalized
to epistemic plausibility models if conditional belief is taken into account.
We present two ways of coping with this issue: (i) adding a modality to the
language, and (ii) putting extra constraints on the models. Finally, we make
some remarks about the interaction between bisimulation and dynamic model
changes.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure
The Logic of Joint Ability in Two-Player Tacit Games
Logics of joint strategic ability have recently received attention, with arguably the most influential being those in a family that includes Coalition Logic (CL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL). Notably, both CL and ATL bypass the epistemic issues that underpin Schelling-type coordination problems, by apparently relying on the meta-level assumption of (perfectly reliable) communication between cooperating rational agents. Yet such epistemic issues arise naturally in settings relevant to ATL and CL: these logics are standardly interpreted on structures where agents move simultaneously, opening the possibility that an agent cannot foresee the concurrent choices of other agents. In this paper we introduce a variant of CL we call Two-Player Strategic Coordination Logic (SCL2). The key novelty of this framework is an operator for capturing coalitional ability when the cooperating agents cannot share strategic information. We identify significant differences in the expressive power and validities of SCL2 and CL2, and present a sound and complete axiomatization for SCL2. We briefly address conceptual challenges when shifting attention to games with more than two players and stronger notions of rationality
On formal aspects of the epistemic approach to paraconsistency
This paper reviews the central points and presents some recent developments of the epistemic approach to paraconsistency in terms of the preservation of evidence. Two formal systems are surveyed, the basic logic of evidence (BLE) and the logic of evidence and truth (LET J ), designed to deal, respectively, with evidence and with evidence and truth. While BLE is equivalent to Nelson’s logic N4, it has been conceived for a different purpose. Adequate valuation semantics that provide decidability are given for both BLE and LET J . The meanings of the connectives of BLE and LET J , from the point of view of preservation of evidence, is explained with the aid of an inferential semantics. A formalization of the notion of evidence for BLE as proposed by M. Fitting is also reviewed here. As a novel result, the paper shows that LET J is semantically characterized through the so-called Fidel structures. Some opportunities for further research are also discussed
Symbolic Model Checking for Dynamic Epistemic Logic
Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) can model complex information
scenarios in a way that appeals to logicians. However, existing DEL
implementations are ad-hoc, so we do not know how the framework really
performs. For this purpose, we want to hook up with the best available
model-checking and SAT techniques in computational logic. We do this
by first providing a bridge: a new faithful representation of DEL models
as so-called knowledge structures that allow for symbolic model checking.
Next, we show that we can now solve well-known benchmark problems in
epistemic scenarios much faster than with existing DEL methods. Finally,
we show that our method is not just a matter of implementation, but
that it raises significant issues about logical representation and update
Symbolic Model Checking for Dynamic Epistemic Logic
Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) can model complex information
scenarios in a way that appeals to logicians. However, existing DEL
implementations are ad-hoc, so we do not know how the framework really
performs. For this purpose, we want to hook up with the best available
model-checking and SAT techniques in computational logic. We do this
by first providing a bridge: a new faithful representation of DEL models
as so-called knowledge structures that allow for symbolic model checking.
Next, we show that we can now solve well-known benchmark problems in
epistemic scenarios much faster than with existing DEL methods. Finally,
we show that our method is not just a matter of implementation, but
that it raises significant issues about logical representation and update
- …