Functionally Specified Distributed Transactions in Co-operative Scenarios

Addresses the problem of specifying co-operative, distributed transactions in a manner that can be subject to verification and testing. Our approach combines the process-algebraic language LOTOS and the object-oriented database modelling language TM to obtain a clear and formal protocol for distributed database transactions meant to describe co-operation scenarios. We argue that a separation of concerns, namely the interaction of database applications on the one hand and data modelling on the other, results in a practical, modular approach that is formally well-founded. An advantage of this is that we may vary over transaction models to support the language combinatio

Modal logics for reasoning about object-based component composition

Component-oriented development of software supports the adaptability and maintainability of large systems, in particular if requirements change over time and parts of a system have to be modified or replaced. The software architecture in such systems can be described by components and their composition. In order to describe larger architectures, the composition concept becomes crucial. We will present a formal framework for component composition for object-based software development. The deployment of modal logics for defining components and component composition will allow us to reason about and prove properties of components and compositions

An Approach to Algebraic Semantics of Object-Oriented Languages

Studying the semantics of programming languages has a long tradition in computer science. Various approaches use various formalisms with various objectives. In the last two decades, algebraic specifications have requently been used to study functional as well as imperative languages, and, in particular, object-orientated ones, thereby often focusing on specific aspects and concepts of this programming paradigm. In this paper, we follow this tradition and develop an algebraic semantics of a sample object-oriented language. We thereby distinguish between the object-oriented concepts of the language to structure code, and the imperative ones to implement functionality and thus the algorithmic parts of the language. Therefore, our approach encompasses two steps: first, we develop an algebraic semantics of basic object-oriented principles, into which, secondly, the semantics of the language s imperative parts is embedded. Static semantic aspects are captured by structured algebraic specifications, whereas dynamic ones are reflected by many-sorted algebras. These aspects are treated as "second order" concepts and are thus interpreted within a model class of the underlying specification. The approach elaborated here can be employed to formalize the semantics of "standard" object-oriented languages such as Eiffel, Java, or C++

The foundational legacy of ASL

Abstract. We recall the kernel algebraic specification language ASL and outline its main features in the context of the state of research on algebraic specification at the time it was conceived in the early 1980s. We discuss the most significant new ideas in ASL and the influence they had on subsequent developments in the field and on our own work in particular.

Steps Towards a Method for the Formal Modeling of Dynamic Objects

Fragments of a method to formally specify object-oriented models of a universe of discourse are presented. The task of finding such models is divided into three subtasks, object classification, event specification, and the specification of the life cycle of an object. Each of these subtasks is further subdivided, and for each of the subtasks heuristics are given that can aid the analyst in deciding how to represent a particular aspect of the real world. The main sources of inspiration are Jackson System Development, algebraic specification of data- and object types, and algebraic specification of processes

Exploiting the Hierarchical Structure of Rule-Based Specifications for Decision Planning

Rule-based specifications have been very successful as a declarative approach in many domains, due to the handy yet solid foundations offered by rule-based machineries like term and graph rewriting. Realistic problems, however, call for suitable techniques to guarantee scalability. For instance, many domains exhibit a hierarchical structure that can be exploited conveniently. This is particularly evident for composition associations of models. We propose an explicit representation of such structured models and a methodology that exploits it for the description and analysis of model- and rule-based systems. The approach is presented in the framework of rewriting logic and its efficient implementation in the rewrite engine Maude and is illustrated with a case study.

Semantic Component Composition

Building complex software systems necessitates the use of component-based architectures. In theory, of the set of components needed for a design, only some small portion of them are "custom"; the rest are reused or refactored existing pieces of software. Unfortunately, this is an idealized situation. Just because two components should work together does not mean that they will work together. The "glue" that holds components together is not just technology. The contracts that bind complex systems together implicitly define more than their explicit type. These "conceptual contracts" describe essential aspects of extra-system semantics: e.g., object models, type systems, data representation, interface action semantics, legal and contractual obligations, and more. Designers and developers spend inordinate amounts of time technologically duct-taping systems to fulfill these conceptual contracts because system-wide semantics have not been rigorously characterized or codified. This paper describes a formal characterization of the problem and discusses an initial implementation of the resulting theoretical system.Comment: 9 pages, submitted to GCSE/SAIG '0