Load balancing using cell range expansion in LTE advanced heterogeneous networks

The use of heterogeneous networks is on the increase, fueled by consumer demand for more data. The main objective of heterogeneous networks is to increase capacity. They offer solutions for efficient use of spectrum, load balancing and improvement of cell edge coverage amongst others. However, these solutions have inherent challenges such as inter-cell interference and poor mobility management. In heterogeneous networks there is transmit power disparity between macro cell and pico cell tiers, which causes load imbalance between the tiers. Due to the conventional user-cell association strategy, whereby users associate to a base station with the strongest received signal strength, few users associate to small cells compared to macro cells. To counter the effects of transmit power disparity, cell range expansion is used instead of the conventional strategy. The focus of our work is on load balancing using cell range expansion (CRE) and network utility optimization techniques to ensure fair sharing of load in a macro and pico cell LTE Advanced heterogeneous network. The aim is to investigate how to use an adaptive cell range expansion bias to optimize Pico cell coverage for load balancing. Reviewed literature points out several approaches to solve the load balancing problem in heterogeneous networks, which include, cell range expansion and utility function optimization. Then, we use cell range expansion, and logarithmic utility functions to design a load balancing algorithm. In the algorithm, user and base station associations are optimized by adapting CRE bias to pico base station load status. A price update mechanism based on a suboptimal solution of a network utility optimization problem is used to adapt the CRE bias. The price is derived from the load status of each pico base station. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by means of an LTE MATLAB toolbox. Simulations were conducted according to 3GPP and ITU guidelines for modelling heterogeneous networks and propagation environment respectively. Compared to a static CRE configuration, the algorithm achieved more fairness in load distribution. Further, it achieved a better trade-off between cell edge and cell centre user throughputs. [Please note: this thesis file has been deferred until December 2016

Project Final Report – FREEDOM ICT-248891

This document is the final publishable summary report of the objective and work carried out within the European Project FREEDOM, ICT-248891.This document is the final publishable summary report of the objective and work carried out within the European Project FREEDOM, ICT-248891.Preprin

On Performance Analysis of Single Frequency Network with C-RAN

Centralized-RAN (C-RAN) is an architectural trend that uses resource sharing and a set of interference mitigation techniques to reduce capital and operational expenditures for mobile network operators (MNOs). One of the technical enablers of a C-RAN solution is single frequency network (SFN) that curbs the interference and allows MNOs to transmit over single frequency across coordinated cells. One of the main advantages of SFN is that it reduces the number of handovers between neighboring cells while improving the overall system performance. In contrast to previous approaches that demonstrate some of the most prominent C-RAN features, in this paper, we first investigate two different SFN deployment scenarios’ characteristics, benefits, and limitations. Second, we perform a simulation analysis of non-SFN and SFN without joint scheduling to observe signal to interference ratio heatmap distribution of the experimental test-site using similar system configurations. Finally, we perform an experimental analysis of joint scheduling in SFN based on coordinated inter baseband units scenario using C-RAN in a realistic environment. The experimental results are tested on a real operating site of a major MNO’s infrastructure in Turkey. Through experimental results, we show overall performance gains of SFN feature in terms of different key performance indicators that are obtained from coordinating remote radio units in an SFN cell. Finally, we discuss about the main takeaways, lessons learned, and challenges of the considered SFN implementation

Survey on 5G Second Phase RAN Architectures and Functional Splits

The Radio Access Network (RAN) architecture evolves with different generations of mobile communication technologies and forms an indispensable component of the mobile network architecture. The main component of the RAN infrastructure is the base station, which includes a Radio Frequency unit and a baseband unit. The RAN is a collection of base stations connected to the core network to provide coverage through one or more radio access technologies. The advancement towards cloud native networks has led to centralizing the baseband processing of radio signals. There is a trade-off between the advantages of RAN centralization (energy efficiency, power cost reduction, and the cost of the fronthaul) and the complexity of carrying traffic between the data processing unit and distributed antennas. 5G networks hold high potential for adopting the centralized architecture to reduce maintenance costs while reducing deployment costs and improving resilience, reliability, and coordination. Incorporating the concept of virtualization and centralized RAN architecture enables to meet the overall requirements for both the customer and Mobile Network Operator. Functional splitting is one of the key enablers for 5G networks. It supports Centralized RAN, virtualized Radio Access Network, and the recent Open Radio Access Networks. This survey provides a comprehensive tutorial on the paradigms of the RAN architecture evolution, its key features, and implementation challenges. It provides a thorough review of the 3rd Generation Partnership Project functional splitting complemented by associated challenges and potential solutions. The survey also presents an overview of the fronthaul and its requirements and possible solutions for implementation, algorithms, and required tools whilst providing a vision of the evaluation beyond 5G second phase.info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersio