Stable Leader Election in Population Protocols Requires Linear Time

A population protocol *stably elects a leader* if, for all $n$, starting from an initial configuration with $n$ agents each in an identical state, with probability 1 it reaches a configuration $\mathbf{y}$ that is correct (exactly one agent is in a special leader state $\ell$) and stable (every configuration reachable from $\mathbf{y}$ also has a single agent in state $\ell$). We show that any population protocol that stably elects a leader requires $\Omega(n)$ expected "parallel time" --- $\Omega(n^2)$ expected total pairwise interactions --- to reach such a stable configuration. Our result also informs the understanding of the time complexity of chemical self-organization by showing an essential difficulty in generating exact quantities of molecular species quickly.Comment: accepted to Distributed Computing special issue of invited papers from DISC 2015; significantly revised proof structure and intuitive explanation

Space-Optimal Majority in Population Protocols

Population protocols are a model of distributed computing, in which $n$ agents with limited local state interact randomly, and cooperate to collectively compute global predicates. An extensive series of papers, across different communities, has examined the computability and complexity characteristics of this model. Majority, or consensus, is a central task, in which agents need to collectively reach a decision as to which one of two states $A$ or $B$ had a higher initial count. Two complexity metrics are important: the time that a protocol requires to stabilize to an output decision, and the state space size that each agent requires. It is known that majority requires $\Omega(\log \log n)$ states per agent to allow for poly-logarithmic time stabilization, and that $O(\log^2 n)$ states are sufficient. Thus, there is an exponential gap between the upper and lower bounds. We address this question. We provide a new lower bound of $\Omega(\log n)$ states for any protocol which stabilizes in $O( n^{1-c} )$ time, for any $c > 0$ constant. This result is conditional on basic monotonicity and output assumptions, satisfied by all known protocols. Technically, it represents a significant departure from previous lower bounds. Instead of relying on dense configurations, we introduce a new surgery technique to construct executions which contradict the correctness of algorithms that stabilize too fast. Subsequently, our lower bound applies to general initial configurations. We give an algorithm for majority which uses $O(\log n)$ states, and stabilizes in $O(\log^2 n)$ time. Central to the algorithm is a new leaderless phase clock, which allows nodes to synchronize in phases of $\Theta(n \log{n})$ consecutive interactions using $O(\log n)$ states per node. We also employ our phase clock to build a leader election algorithm with $O(\log n )$ states, which stabilizes in $O(\log^2 n)$ time

How Many Cooks Spoil the Soup?

In this work, we study the following basic question: "How much parallelism does a distributed task permit?" Our definition of parallelism (or symmetry) here is not in terms of speed, but in terms of identical roles that processes have at the same time in the execution. We initiate this study in population protocols, a very simple model that not only allows for a straightforward definition of what a role is, but also encloses the challenge of isolating the properties that are due to the protocol from those that are due to the adversary scheduler, who controls the interactions between the processes. We (i) give a partial characterization of the set of predicates on input assignments that can be stably computed with maximum symmetry, i.e., $\Theta(N_{min})$, where $N_{min}$ is the minimum multiplicity of a state in the initial configuration, and (ii) we turn our attention to the remaining predicates and prove a strong impossibility result for the parity predicate: the inherent symmetry of any protocol that stably computes it is upper bounded by a constant that depends on the size of the protocol.Comment: 19 page

Efficient size estimation and impossibility of termination in uniform dense population protocols

We study uniform population protocols: networks of anonymous agents whose pairwise interactions are chosen at random, where each agent uses an identical transition algorithm that does not depend on the population size $n$. Many existing polylog$(n)$ time protocols for leader election and majority computation are nonuniform: to operate correctly, they require all agents to be initialized with an approximate estimate of $n$ (specifically, the exact value $\lfloor \log n \rfloor$). Our first main result is a uniform protocol for calculating $\log(n) \pm O(1)$ with high probability in $O(\log^2 n)$ time and $O(\log^4 n)$ states ($O(\log \log n)$ bits of memory). The protocol is converging but not terminating: it does not signal when the estimate is close to the true value of $\log n$. If it could be made terminating, this would allow composition with protocols, such as those for leader election or majority, that require a size estimate initially, to make them uniform (though with a small probability of failure). We do show how our main protocol can be indirectly composed with others in a simple and elegant way, based on the leaderless phase clock, demonstrating that those protocols can in fact be made uniform. However, our second main result implies that the protocol cannot be made terminating, a consequence of a much stronger result: a uniform protocol for any task requiring more than constant time cannot be terminating even with probability bounded above 0, if infinitely many initial configurations are dense: any state present initially occupies $\Omega(n)$ agents. (In particular, no leader is allowed.) Crucially, the result holds no matter the memory or time permitted. Finally, we show that with an initial leader, our size-estimation protocol can be made terminating with high probability, with the same asymptotic time and space bounds.Comment: Using leaderless phase cloc

Hardness of Computing and Approximating Predicates and Functions with Leaderless Population Protocols

Population protocols are a distributed computing model appropriate for describing massive numbers of agents with very limited computational power (finite automata in this paper), such as sensor networks or programmable chemical reaction networks in synthetic biology. A population protocol is said to require a leader if every valid initial configuration contains a single agent in a special "leader" state that helps to coordinate the computation. Although the class of predicates and functions computable with probability 1 (stable computation) is the same whether a leader is required or not (semilinear functions and predicates), it is not known whether a leader is necessary for fast computation. Due to the large number of agents n (synthetic molecular systems routinely have trillions of molecules), efficient population protocols are generally defined as those computing in polylogarithmic in n (parallel) time. We consider population protocols that start in leaderless initial configurations, and the computation is regarded finished when the population protocol reaches a configuration from which a different output is no longer reachable. In this setting we show that a wide class of functions and predicates computable by population protocols are not efficiently computable (they require at least linear time), nor are some linear functions even efficiently approximable. It requires at least linear time for a population protocol even to approximate division by a constant or subtraction (or any linear function with a coefficient outside of N), in the sense that for sufficiently small gamma > 0, the output of a sublinear time protocol can stabilize outside the interval f(m) (1 +/- gamma) on infinitely many inputs m. In a complementary positive result, we show that with a sufficiently large value of gamma, a population protocol can approximate any linear f with nonnegative rational coefficients, within approximation factor gamma, in O(log n) time. We also show that it requires linear time to exactly compute a wide range of semilinear functions (e.g., f(m)=m if m is even and 2m if m is odd) and predicates (e.g., parity, equality)