4,286 research outputs found

    Regulation Theory

    Full text link
    This paper reviews the design of regulation loops for power converters. Power converter control being a vast domain, it does not aim to be exhaustive. The objective is to give a rapid overview of the main synthesis methods in both continuous- and discrete-time domains.Comment: 23 pages, contribution to the 2014 CAS - CERN Accelerator School: Power Converters, Baden, Switzerland, 7-14 May 201

    Disturbance rejection FOPID controller design in v-domain

    Get PDF
    Due to the adverse effects of unpredictable environmental disturbances on real control systems, robustness of control performance becomes a substantial asset for control system design. This study introduces a v-domain optimal design scheme for Fractional Order Proportional-Integral-Derivative (FOPID) controllers with adoption of Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization. The proposed design scheme performs placement of system pole with minimum angle to the first Riemann sheet in order to obtain improved disturbance rejection control performance. In this manner, optimal placement of the minimum angle system pole is conducted by fulfilling a predefined reference to disturbance rate (RDR) design specification. For a computer-aided solution of this optimal design problem, a multi-objective controller design strategy is presented by adopting GA. Illustrative design examples are demonstrated to evaluate performance of designed FOPID controllers. © 2020COST ActionEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) [CA15225]; COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST

    Disturbance Observer-based Robust Control and Its Applications: 35th Anniversary Overview

    Full text link
    Disturbance Observer has been one of the most widely used robust control tools since it was proposed in 1983. This paper introduces the origins of Disturbance Observer and presents a survey of the major results on Disturbance Observer-based robust control in the last thirty-five years. Furthermore, it explains the analysis and synthesis techniques of Disturbance Observer-based robust control for linear and nonlinear systems by using a unified framework. In the last section, this paper presents concluding remarks on Disturbance Observer-based robust control and its engineering applications.Comment: 12 pages, 4 figure

    Stabilization of time-delay systems : an overview of the algebraic approach

    Get PDF

    Automating control system design via a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm

    Get PDF
    This chapter presents a performance-prioritized computer aided control system design (CACSD) methodology using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. The evolutionary CACSD approach unifies different control laws in both the time and frequency domains based upon performance satisfactions, without the need of aggregating different design criteria into a compromise function. It is shown that control engineers' expertise as well as settings on goal or priority for different preference on each performance requirement can be easily included and modified on-line according to the evolving trade-offs, which makes the controller design interactive, transparent and simple for real-time implementation. Advantages of the evolutionary CACSD methodology are illustrated upon a non-minimal phase plant control system, which offer a set of low-order Pareto optimal controllers satisfying all the conflicting performance requirements in the face of system constraints

    Control Engineering

    Get PDF
    Control means a speci?c action to reach the desired behavior of a system. In the control of industrial processes generally technological processes, are considered, but control is highly required to keep any physical, chemical, biological, communication, economic, or social process functioning in a desired manner

    DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FRACTIONAL-ORDER CONTROLLER IN DELTA DOMAIN

    Get PDF
    In this work, a fractional-order controller (FOC) is designed in a discrete domain using delta operator parameterization. FOC gets rationally approximated using continued fraction expansion (CFE) in the delta domain. Whenever discretization of any continuous-time system takes place, the choice of sampling time becomes the most critical parameter to get most accurate results. Obtaining a higher sampling rate using conventional shift operator parameterization is not possible and delta operator parameterized discretize time system takes the advantages to circumvent the problem associated with the shift operator parameterization at a high sampling limit. In this work, a first-order plant with delay is considered to be controlled with FOC, and is implemented in discrete delta domain. The plant model is designed using MATLAB as well as in hardware. The fractional-order controller is tuned in the continuous domain and discretized in delta domain to make the discrete delta FOC. Continuous time fractional order operator (s±α) is directly discretized in delta domain to get the overall FOC in discrete domain. The designed controller in implemented using MATLABSimulink and dSPACE board such that dSPACEboard acts as the hardware implemented FOC. The step response characteristics of the closed-loop system using delta domain FOC resembles to that of the results obtained by continuous time controller. It proves that at a high sampling rate, the continuous-time result and discrete-time result are obtained hand to hand rather than the two individual cases. Therefore, the analysis and design of FOC parameterized with delta operator opens up a new area in the design and implementation of discrete FOC, which unifies both continuous and discrete-time results. The discrete model performance characteristics are evaluated in software simulation using MATLAB, and results are validated through the hardware implementation using dSPACE

    A classification of techniques for the compensation of time delayed processes. Part 2: Structurally optimised controllers

    Get PDF
    Following on from Part 1, Part 2 of the paper considers the use of structurally optimised controllers to compensate time delayed processes
    corecore