Kontextsensitive Modellhierarchien für Quantifizierung der höherdimensionalen Unsicherheit

We formulate four novel context-aware algorithms based on model hierarchies aimed to enable an efficient quantification of uncertainty in complex, computationally expensive problems, such as fluid-structure interaction and plasma microinstability simulations. Our results show that our algorithms are more efficient than standard approaches and that they are able to cope with the challenges of quantifying uncertainty in higher-dimensional, complex problems.Wir formulieren vier kontextsensitive Algorithmen auf der Grundlage von Modellhierarchien um eine effiziente Quantifizierung der Unsicherheit bei komplexen, rechenintensiven Problemen zu ermöglichen, wie Fluid-Struktur-Wechselwirkungs- und Plasma-Mikroinstabilitätssimulationen. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass unsere Algorithmen effizienter als Standardansätze sind und die Herausforderungen der Quantifizierung der Unsicherheit in höherdimensionalen, komplexen Problemen bewältigen können

ADVANCES IN SYSTEM RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN AND PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT (PHM) FOR SYSTEM RESILIENCE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

Failures of engineered systems can lead to significant economic and societal losses. Despite tremendous efforts (e.g., $200 billion annually) denoted to reliability and maintenance, unexpected catastrophic failures still occurs. To minimize the losses, reliability of engineered systems must be ensured throughout their life-cycle amidst uncertain operational condition and manufacturing variability. In most engineered systems, the required system reliability level under adverse events is achieved by adding system redundancies and/or conducting system reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). However, a high level of system redundancy increases a system's life-cycle cost (LCC) and system RBDO cannot ensure the system reliability when unexpected loading/environmental conditions are applied and unexpected system failures are developed. In contrast, a new design paradigm, referred to as resilience-driven system design, can ensure highly reliable system designs under any loading/environmental conditions and system failures while considerably reducing systems' LCC. In order to facilitate the development of formal methodologies for this design paradigm, this research aims at advancing two essential and co-related research areas: Research Thrust 1 - system RBDO and Research Thrust 2 - system prognostics and health management (PHM). In Research Thrust 1, reliability analyses under uncertainty will be carried out in both component and system levels against critical failure mechanisms. In Research Thrust 2, highly accurate and robust PHM systems will be designed for engineered systems with a single or multiple time-scale(s). To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed system RBDO and PHM techniques, multiple engineering case studies will be presented and discussed. Following the development of Research Thrusts 1 and 2, Research Thrust 3 - resilience-driven system design will establish a theoretical basis and design framework of engineering resilience in a mathematical and statistical context, where engineering resilience will be formulated in terms of system reliability and restoration and the proposed design framework will be demonstrated with a simplified aircraft control actuator design problem

Comparison of surrogate-based uncertainty quantification methods for computationally expensive simulators

This version: arXiv:1511.00926v4 [math.ST] Available from ArXiv.org via the link in this record.Polynomial chaos and Gaussian process emulation are methods for surrogate-based uncertainty quantification, and have been developed independently in their respective communities over the last 25 years. Despite tackling similar problems in the field, to our knowledge there has yet to be a critical comparison of the two approaches in the literature. We begin by providing a detailed description of polynomial chaos and Gaussian process approaches for building a surrogate model of a black-box function. The accuracy of each surrogate method is then tested and compared for two simulators used in industry: a land-surface model (adJULES) and a launch vehicle controller (VEGACONTROL). We analyse surrogates built on experimental designs of various size and type to investigate their performance in a range of modelling scenarios. Specifically, polynomial chaos and Gaussian process surrogates are built on Sobol sequence and tensor grid designs. Their accuracy is measured by their ability to estimate the mean, standard deviation, exceedance probabilities and probability density function of the simulator output, as well as a root mean square error metric, based on an independent validation design. We find that one method does not unanimously outperform the other, but advantages can be gained in some cases, such that the preferred method depends on the modelling goals of the practitioner. Our conclusions are likely to depend somewhat on the modelling choices for the surrogates as well as the design strategy. We hope that this work will spark future comparisons of the two methods in their more advanced formulations and for different sampling strategies