3,214 research outputs found

    Neural Models of Motion Integration, Segmentation, and Probablistic Decision-Making

    Full text link
    When brain mechanism carry out motion integration and segmentation processes that compute unambiguous global motion percepts from ambiguous local motion signals? Consider, for example, a deer running at variable speeds behind forest cover. The forest cover is an occluder that creates apertures through which fragments of the deer's motion signals are intermittently experienced. The brain coherently groups these fragments into a trackable percept of the deer in its trajectory. Form and motion processes are needed to accomplish this using feedforward and feedback interactions both within and across cortical processing streams. All the cortical areas V1, V2, MT, and MST are involved in these interactions. Figure-ground processes in the form stream through V2, such as the seperation of occluding boundaries of the forest cover from the boundaries of the deer, select the motion signals which determine global object motion percepts in the motion stream through MT. Sparse, but unambiguous, feauture tracking signals are amplified before they propogate across position and are intergrated with far more numerous ambiguous motion signals. Figure-ground and integration processes together determine the global percept. A neural model predicts the processing stages that embody these form and motion interactions. Model concepts and data are summarized about motion grouping across apertures in response to a wide variety of displays, and probabilistic decision making in parietal cortex in response to random dot displays.National Science Foundation (SBE-0354378); Office of Naval Research (N00014-01-1-0624

    Interpersonal Neural Entrainment during Early Social Interaction

    Get PDF
    Currently, we understand much about how children’s brains attend to and learn from information presented while they are alone, viewing a screen – but less about how interpersonal social influences are substantiated in the brain. Here, we consider research that examines how social behaviors affect not one, but both partners in a dyad. We review studies that measured interpersonal neural entrainment during early social interaction, considering two ways of measuring entrainment: concurrent entrainment (e.g., ‘when A is high, B is high’ – also known as synchrony) and sequential entrainment (‘changes in A forward-predict changes in B’). We discuss possible causes of interpersonal neural entrainment, and consider whether it is merely an epiphenomenon, or whether it plays an independent, mechanistic role in early attention and learning

    Neuroimaging of typical and atypical development: A perspective from multiple levels of analysis

    Get PDF
    To date, research involving functional neuroimaging of typical and atypical development has depended on several assumptions about the postnatal maturation of the brain. We consider evidence from multiple levels of analysis that brings into question these underlying assumptions and advance an alternative view. This alternative view, based on an “interactive specialization” approach to postnatal brain development, indicates that there is a need to: obtain data from early in development; focus more on differences in interregional interactions rather than searching for localized, discrete lesions; examine the temporal dynamics of neural processing; and move away from deficits to image tasks in which atypical participants perform as well as typically developing participant

    Collective stability of networks of winner-take-all circuits

    Full text link
    The neocortex has a remarkably uniform neuronal organization, suggesting that common principles of processing are employed throughout its extent. In particular, the patterns of connectivity observed in the superficial layers of the visual cortex are consistent with the recurrent excitation and inhibitory feedback required for cooperative-competitive circuits such as the soft winner-take-all (WTA). WTA circuits offer interesting computational properties such as selective amplification, signal restoration, and decision making. But, these properties depend on the signal gain derived from positive feedback, and so there is a critical trade-off between providing feedback strong enough to support the sophisticated computations, while maintaining overall circuit stability. We consider the question of how to reason about stability in very large distributed networks of such circuits. We approach this problem by approximating the regular cortical architecture as many interconnected cooperative-competitive modules. We demonstrate that by properly understanding the behavior of this small computational module, one can reason over the stability and convergence of very large networks composed of these modules. We obtain parameter ranges in which the WTA circuit operates in a high-gain regime, is stable, and can be aggregated arbitrarily to form large stable networks. We use nonlinear Contraction Theory to establish conditions for stability in the fully nonlinear case, and verify these solutions using numerical simulations. The derived bounds allow modes of operation in which the WTA network is multi-stable and exhibits state-dependent persistent activities. Our approach is sufficiently general to reason systematically about the stability of any network, biological or technological, composed of networks of small modules that express competition through shared inhibition.Comment: 7 Figure

    Solving Navigational Uncertainty Using Grid Cells on Robots

    Get PDF
    To successfully navigate their habitats, many mammals use a combination of two mechanisms, path integration and calibration using landmarks, which together enable them to estimate their location and orientation, or pose. In large natural environments, both these mechanisms are characterized by uncertainty: the path integration process is subject to the accumulation of error, while landmark calibration is limited by perceptual ambiguity. It remains unclear how animals form coherent spatial representations in the presence of such uncertainty. Navigation research using robots has determined that uncertainty can be effectively addressed by maintaining multiple probabilistic estimates of a robot's pose. Here we show how conjunctive grid cells in dorsocaudal medial entorhinal cortex (dMEC) may maintain multiple estimates of pose using a brain-based robot navigation system known as RatSLAM. Based both on rodent spatially-responsive cells and functional engineering principles, the cells at the core of the RatSLAM computational model have similar characteristics to rodent grid cells, which we demonstrate by replicating the seminal Moser experiments. We apply the RatSLAM model to a new experimental paradigm designed to examine the responses of a robot or animal in the presence of perceptual ambiguity. Our computational approach enables us to observe short-term population coding of multiple location hypotheses, a phenomenon which would not be easily observable in rodent recordings. We present behavioral and neural evidence demonstrating that the conjunctive grid cells maintain and propagate multiple estimates of pose, enabling the correct pose estimate to be resolved over time even without uniquely identifying cues. While recent research has focused on the grid-like firing characteristics, accuracy and representational capacity of grid cells, our results identify a possible critical and unique role for conjunctive grid cells in filtering sensory uncertainty. We anticipate our study to be a starting point for animal experiments that test navigation in perceptually ambiguous environments

    Task-Dependent Individual Differences in Prefrontal Connectivity

    Get PDF
    Recent advances in neuroimaging have permitted testing of hypotheses regarding the neural bases of individual differences, but this burgeoning literature has been characterized by inconsistent results. To test the hypothesis that differences in task demands could contribute to between-study variability in brain-behavior relationships, we had participants perform 2 tasks that varied in the extent of cognitive involvement. We examined connectivity between brain regions during a low-demand vigilance task and a higher-demand digit–symbol visual search task using Granger causality analysis (GCA). Our results showed 1) Significant differences in numbers of frontoparietal connections between low- and high-demand tasks 2) that GCA can detect activity changes that correspond with task-demand changes, and 3) faster participants showed more vigilance-related activity than slower participants, but less visual-search activity. These results suggest that relatively low-demand cognitive performance depends on spontaneous bidirectionally fluctuating network activity, whereas high-demand performance depends on a limited, unidirectional network. The nature of brain-behavior relationships may vary depending on the extent of cognitive demand. High-demand network activity may reflect the extent to which individuals require top-down executive guidance of behavior for successful task performance. Low-demand network activity may reflect task- and performance monitoring that minimizes executive requirements for guidance of behavior

    Stimulus and task-dependent gamma activity in monkey V1

    Get PDF
    The single unit doctrine proposes that each one of our percepts and sensations is represented by the activity of specialized high-level cells in the brain. A common criticism applied to this proposal is the one referred to as the "combinatorial problem". We are constantly confronted with unlimited combinations of elements and features, and yet we face no problem in recognizing patterns and objects present in visual scenes. Are there enough neurons in the brain to singly code for each one of our percepts? Or is it the case that perceptions are represented by the distributed activity of different neuronal ensembles? We lack a general theory capable of explaining how distributed information can be efficiently integrated into single percepts. The working hypothesis here is that distributed neuronal ensembles signal relations present in the stimulus by selectively synchronizing their spiking responses. Synchronization is generally associated with oscillatory activity in the brain. Gamma oscillations in particular have been linked to various integrative processes in the visual system. Studies in anesthetized animals have shown a conspicuous increase in power for the gamma frequency band (30 to 60 Hz) in response to visual stimuli. Recently, these observations have been extended to behavioral studies which addressed the role of gamma activity in cognitive processes demanding selective attention. The initial motivation for carrying out this work was to test if the binding-by-synchronization (BBS) hypothesis serves as a neuronal mechanism for perceptual grouping in the visual system. To this aim we used single and superimposed grating stimuli. Superimposed gratings (plaids) are bi-stable stimuli capable of eliciting different percepts depending on their physical characteristics. In this way, plaids can be perceived either as a single moving surface (pattern plaids), or as two segregated surfaces drifting in different directions (component plaids). While testing the BBS hypothesis, we performed various experiments which addressed the role of both stimulus and cortical architecture on the properties of gamma oscillations in the primary visual cortex (V1) of monkeys. Additionally, we investigated whether gamma activity could also be modulated by allocating attention in time. Finally, we report on gamma-phase shifts in area V1, and how they depend on the level of neuronal activation. ...Einleitung: Die visuelle Hirnforschung hat eine große Informationsmenge über die analytischen Fähigkeiten des Nervensystems zusammengetragen. Die Einführung von Einzelzellableitungen ermöglichte eine detaillierte Beschreibung der Eigenschaften rezeptiver Felder im Sehsystem. Konzentrische rezeptive Felder in der Netzhaut antworten optimal auf einen Luminanzkontrast in ihren On- und Off-Regionen. Antworteigenschaften entwickeln sich schrittweise entlang der Sehbahn, indem zunehmend komplexere Eigenschaften des visuellen Reizes extrahiert werden. Die Pionierarbeiten von David Hubel und Torsten Wiesel beschrieben zunächst Orientierung- und Richtungsselektivität von Neuronen in frühen visuellen Kortexarealen. Später fand man Einzelzellen im medialen Temporallappen, die auf komplexe Objekte wie Hände und Gesichter antworten. Die Hirnforschung ist daher lange davon ausgegangen, dass die Repräsentation komplexer Objekte eine natürliche Entfaltung von Konvergenz entlang der Sehbahn darstellt. Zellen, welche auf elementare Merkmale des Stimulus antworteten, bildeten so durch ihr Muster anatomischer Verbindungen schrittweise die spezialisierten Neurone in höheren visuellen Arealen. Diese Sichtweise zeigt allerdings Limitationen auf. Eine beständige Kritik, die an der "Einzelzelldoktrin" geübt wird, ist das sogenannte kombinatorische Problem. Obwohl wir ständig mit einer unbegrenzten Fülle an Kombinationen verschiedener Elemente und Merkmale konfrontiert sind, laufen wir selten Gefahr, Muster und Objekte in einer visuellen Szene nicht zu erkennen. Ist es überhaupt möglich, dass jedes unserer möglichen Perzepte durch die Antwort eines einzelnen hoch spezialisierten Neurons im Hirn kodiert wird? Falls nicht, welcher Mechanismus könnte einen relationalen Code darstellen, der es ermöglicht, die Aktivität verschiedener neuronaler Ensembles zu integrieren? Die Anforderungen an einen solchen Mechanismus treten besonders hervor, wenn man sich die verteilte Struktur der visuellen Verarbeitung verdeutlicht. Die Merkmalsextraktion entlang der Sehbahn führt unvermeidbar zu einer räumlich verstreuten Repräsentation eines visuellen Reizes. Zusätzlich kommen parallele Bahnen neuronaler Verarbeitung im Hirn häufig vor. Es fehlt eine universale Theorie darüber, wie die verteilte Information effizient in eine einzige Wahrnehmung integriert wird. Die Arbeitshypothese hier lautet, dass das Hirn die Zeitdomäne benutzt, um visuelle Informationen zu integrieren und zu verarbeiten. Konkret würden neuronale Ensemble die aus dem Stimulus hervorgehenden Beziehungen durch eine selektive Synchronisation ihrer Aktionspotenziale signalisieren. Synchronisation ist normalerweise mit oszillatorischer Hirnaktivität assoziiert. Besonders die Oszillationen im Gamma Frequenzband sind mit verschiedensten integrativen Prozessen im Sehsystem in Verbindung gebracht worden. Arbeiten an anästhesierten Tieren haben einen auffälligen Anstieg von Energie im Gamma Frequenzband (30-60 Hz) unter visueller Stimulation gezeigt. Kürzlich sind diese Beobachtungen auf Verhaltensstudien ausgeweitet worden, welche die Rolle von Gamma Aktivität bei der für kognitive Prozesse erforderlichen gerichteten Aufmerksamkeit untersuchen. Die ursprüngliche Motivation dieser Arbeit war es, die von Wolf Singer und Mitarbeitern formulierte "binding-bysynchronization (BBS)" Hypothese zu testen. Dies wurde durch die Ableitung neuronaler Antworten in V1 bei Darbietung eines Paars übereinander gelegter Balkengitter ("Plaid" Stimulus) angegangen. Physikalische Manipulationen der Luminanz in Unterregionen des Plaid-Stimulus können die Wahrnehmung zugunsten der Bewegung der Einzelkomponenten (zwei Objekte, die sich übereinander schieben) oder der Bewegung des Gesamtmusters (ein einziges sich in eine gemeinsame Richtung bewegendes Objekt) beeinflussen. Die gleichzeitige Ableitung von zwei Neuronen, die jeweils nur selektiv auf eines der beiden Balkengitter antworteten, ermöglichte es uns, zwei Vorhersagen der BBS Hypothese zu testen. Falls beide V1 Neurone auf dasselbe Balkengitter antworteten, sollten sie ihre Aktivität unabhängig davon, ob das Plaid in Einzelkomponenten oder als Gesamtmuster wahrgenommen würde, synchronisieren. Der Grund dafür wäre, dass beide Neurone auf dasselbe Objekt reagierten. Im zweiten Fall antworten beide Ableitstellen auf jeweils eine der beiden Balkengitterkomponenten. Hier sagt die BBS Hypothese voraus, dass beide ihre Aktivität nur bei Gesamtmusterbewegung synchronisieren würden, da sie nur in dieser Bedingung auf dasselbe Objekt antworten würden. ..
    corecore