4 research outputs found
Deep Audio Analyzer: a Framework to Industrialize the Research on Audio Forensics
Deep Audio Analyzer is an open source speech framework that aims to simplify
the research and the development process of neural speech processing pipelines,
allowing users to conceive, compare and share results in a fast and
reproducible way. This paper describes the core architecture designed to
support several tasks of common interest in the audio forensics field, showing
possibility of creating new tasks thus customizing the framework. By means of
Deep Audio Analyzer, forensics examiners (i.e. from Law Enforcement Agencies)
and researchers will be able to visualize audio features, easily evaluate
performances on pretrained models, to create, export and share new audio
analysis workflows by combining deep neural network models with few clicks. One
of the advantages of this tool is to speed up research and practical
experimentation, in the field of audio forensics analysis thus also improving
experimental reproducibility by exporting and sharing pipelines. All features
are developed in modules accessible by the user through a Graphic User
Interface. Index Terms: Speech Processing, Deep Learning Audio, Deep Learning
Audio Pipeline creation, Audio Forensics
Recommended from our members
Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios
We describe and validate a feature-based system for calculation of likelihood ratios from 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases. The system includes a database of 3D digital images of the bases of 10 cartridges fired per firearm from approximately 300 firearms of the same class (semi-automatic pistols that fire 9 mm diameter centre-fire Luger-type ammunition, and that have hemispherical firing pins and parallel breech-face marks). The images were captured using Evofinder®, an imaging system that is commonly used by operational forensic laboratories. A key component of the research reported is the comparison of different feature-extraction methods. Feature sets compared include those previously proposed in the literature, plus Zernike-moment based features. Comparisons are also made of using feature sets extracted from the firing-pin impression, from the breech-face region, and from the whole region of interest (firing-pin impression + breech-face region + flowback if present). Likelihood ratios are calculated using a statistical modelling pipeline that is standard in forensic voice comparison. Validation is conducted and results are assessed using validation procedures and validation metrics and graphics that are standard in forensic voice comparison
Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios
We describe and validate a feature-based system for calculation of likelihood ratios from 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases. The system includes a database of 3D digital images of the bases of 10 cartridges fired per firearm from approximately 300 firearms of the same class (semi-automatic pistols that fire 9 mm diameter centre-fire Luger-type ammunition, and that have hemispherical firing pins and parallel breech-face marks). The images were captured using Evofinder®, an imaging system that is commonly used by operational forensic laboratories. A key component of the research reported is the comparison of different feature-extraction methods. Feature sets compared include those previously proposed in the literature, plus Zernike-moment based features. Comparisons are also made of using feature sets extracted from the firing-pin impression, from the breech-face region, and from the whole region of interest (firing-pin impression + breech-face region + flowback if present). Likelihood ratios are calculated using a statistical modelling pipeline that is standard in forensic voice comparison. Validation is conducted and results are assessed using validation procedures and validation metrics and graphics that are standard in forensic voice comparison