Algebraic Principles for Rely-Guarantee Style Concurrency Verification Tools

We provide simple equational principles for deriving rely-guarantee-style inference rules and refinement laws based on idempotent semirings. We link the algebraic layer with concrete models of programs based on languages and execution traces. We have implemented the approach in Isabelle/HOL as a lightweight concurrency verification tool that supports reasoning about the control and data flow of concurrent programs with shared variables at different levels of abstraction. This is illustrated on two simple verification examples

Bringing Iris into the Verified Software Toolchain

The Verified Software Toolchain (VST) is a system for proving correctness of C programs using separation logic. By connecting to the verified compiler CompCert, it produces the strongest possible guarantees of correctness for real C code that we can compile and run. VST included concurrency from its inception, in the form of reasoning about lock invariants, but concurrent separation logic (CSL) has advanced by leaps and bounds since then. In this paper, we describe efforts to integrate advancements from Iris, a state-of-the-art mechanized CSL, into VST. Some features of Iris (ghost state and invariants) are re-implemented in VST from the ground up; others (Iris Proof Mode) are imported from the Iris development; still others (proof rules for atomic operations) are axiomatized, with the hope that they will be made foundational in future versions. The result is a system that can prove correctness of sophisticated concurrent programs implemented in C, with fine-grained locking and non-blocking atomic operations, that yields varying soundness guarantees depending on the features used.Comment: 21 pages, 4 figure

A Formal C Memory Model for Separation Logic

The core of a formal semantics of an imperative programming language is a memory model that describes the behavior of operations on the memory. Defining a memory model that matches the description of C in the C11 standard is challenging because C allows both high-level (by means of typed expressions) and low-level (by means of bit manipulation) memory accesses. The C11 standard has restricted the interaction between these two levels to make more effective compiler optimizations possible, on the expense of making the memory model complicated. We describe a formal memory model of the (non-concurrent part of the) C11 standard that incorporates these restrictions, and at the same time describes low-level memory operations. This formal memory model includes a rich permission model to make it usable in separation logic and supports reasoning about program transformations. The memory model and essential properties of it have been fully formalized using the Coq proof assistant

Inductive and Coinductive Components of Corecursive Functions in Coq

In Constructive Type Theory, recursive and corecursive definitions are subject to syntactic restrictions which guarantee termination for recursive functions and productivity for corecursive functions. However, many terminating and productive functions do not pass the syntactic tests. Bove proposed in her thesis an elegant reformulation of the method of accessibility predicates that widens the range of terminative recursive functions formalisable in Constructive Type Theory. In this paper, we pursue the same goal for productive corecursive functions. Notably, our method of formalisation of coinductive definitions of productive functions in Coq requires not only the use of ad-hoc predicates, but also a systematic algorithm that separates the inductive and coinductive parts of functions.Comment: Dans Coalgebraic Methods in Computer Science (2008

A framework for automated concurrency verification

Reasoning systems based on Concurrent Separation Logic make verifying complex concurrent algorithms readily possible. Such algorithms contain subtle protocols of permission and resource transfer between threads; to cope with these intricacies, modern concurrent separation logics contain many moving parts and integrate many bespoke logical components. Verifying concurrent algorithms by hand consumes much time, effort, and expertise. As a result, computer-assisted verification is a fertile research topic, and fully automated verification is a popular research goal. Unfortunately, the complexity of modern concurrent separation logics makes them hard to automate, and the proliferation and fast turnover of such logics causes a downward pressure against building tools for new logics. As a result, many such logics lack tooling. This dissertation proposes Starling: a scheme for creating concurrent program logics that are automatable by construction. Starling adapts the existing Concurrent Views Framework for sound concurrent reasoning systems, overlaying a framework for reducing concurrent proof outlines to verification conditions in existing theories (such as those accepted by off-the-shelf sequential solvers). This dissertation describes Starling in a bottom-up, modular manner. First, it shows the derivation of a series of general concurrency proof rules from the Views framework. Next, it shows how one such rule leads to the Starling framework itself. From there, it outlines a series of increasingly elaborate frontends: ways of decomposing individual Hoare triples over atomic actions into verification conditions suitable for encoding into backend theories. Each frontend leads to a concurrent program logic. Finally, the dissertation presents a tool for verifying C-style concurrent proof outlines, based on one of the above frontends. It gives examples of such outlines, covering a variety of algorithms, backend solvers, and proof techniques

Formal Analysis of Concurrent Programs

In this thesis, extensions of Kleene algebras are used to develop algebras for rely-guarantee style reasoning about concurrent programs. In addition to these algebras, detailed denotational models are implemented in the interactive theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. Formal soundness proofs link the algebras to their models. This follows a general algebraic approach for developing correct by construction verification tools within Isabelle. In this approach, algebras provide inference rules and abstract principles for reasoning about the control flow of programs, while the concrete models provide laws for reasoning about data flow. This yields a rapid, lightweight approach for the construction of verification and refinement tools. These tools are used to construct a popular example from the literature, via refinement, within the context of a general-purpose interactive theorem proving environment