1,037 research outputs found
Unilateral Altruism in Network Routing Games with Atomic Players
We study a routing game in which one of the players unilaterally acts
altruistically by taking into consideration the latency cost of other players
as well as his own. By not playing selfishly, a player can not only improve the
other players' equilibrium utility but also improve his own equilibrium
utility. To quantify the effect, we define a metric called the Value of
Unilateral Altruism (VoU) to be the ratio of the equilibrium utility of the
altruistic user to the equilibrium utility he would have received in Nash
equilibrium if he were selfish. We show by example that the VoU, in a game with
nonlinear latency functions and atomic players, can be arbitrarily large. Since
the Nash equilibrium social welfare of this example is arbitrarily far from
social optimum, this example also has a Price of Anarchy (PoA) that is
unbounded. The example is driven by there being a small number of players since
the same example with non-atomic players yields a Nash equilibrium that is
fully efficient
Selfish Routing on Dynamic Flows
Selfish routing on dynamic flows over time is used to model scenarios that
vary with time in which individual agents act in their best interest. In this
paper we provide a survey of a particular dynamic model, the deterministic
queuing model, and discuss how the model can be adjusted and applied to
different real-life scenarios. We then examine how these adjustments affect the
computability, optimality, and existence of selfish routings.Comment: Oberlin College Computer Science Honors Thesis. Supervisor: Alexa
Sharp, Oberlin Colleg
Bottleneck Routing Games with Low Price of Anarchy
We study {\em bottleneck routing games} where the social cost is determined
by the worst congestion on any edge in the network. In the literature,
bottleneck games assume player utility costs determined by the worst congested
edge in their paths. However, the Nash equilibria of such games are inefficient
since the price of anarchy can be very high and proportional to the size of the
network. In order to obtain smaller price of anarchy we introduce {\em
exponential bottleneck games} where the utility costs of the players are
exponential functions of their congestions. We find that exponential bottleneck
games are very efficient and give a poly-log bound on the price of anarchy:
, where is the largest path length in the
players' strategy sets and is the set of edges in the graph. By adjusting
the exponential utility costs with a logarithm we obtain games whose player
costs are almost identical to those in regular bottleneck games, and at the
same time have the good price of anarchy of exponential games.Comment: 12 page
The Price of Anarchy for Selfish Ring Routing is Two
We analyze the network congestion game with atomic players, asymmetric
strategies, and the maximum latency among all players as social cost. This
important social cost function is much less understood than the average
latency. We show that the price of anarchy is at most two, when the network is
a ring and the link latencies are linear. Our bound is tight. This is the first
sharp bound for the maximum latency objective.Comment: Full version of WINE 2012 paper, 24 page
- …