How Technology Impacts and Compares to Humans in Socially Consequential Arenas

One of the main promises of technology development is for it to be adopted by people, organizations, societies, and governments -- incorporated into their life, work stream, or processes. Often, this is socially beneficial as it automates mundane tasks, frees up more time for other more important things, or otherwise improves the lives of those who use the technology. However, these beneficial results do not apply in every scenario and may not impact everyone in a system the same way. Sometimes a technology is developed which produces both benefits and inflicts some harm. These harms may come at a higher cost to some people than others, raising the question: {\it how are benefits and harms weighed when deciding if and how a socially consequential technology gets developed?} The most natural way to answer this question, and in fact how people first approach it, is to compare the new technology to what used to exist. As such, in this work, I make comparative analyses between humans and machines in three scenarios and seek to understand how sentiment about a technology, performance of that technology, and the impacts of that technology combine to influence how one decides to answer my main research question.Comment: Doctoral thesis proposal. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2110.08396, arXiv:2108.12508, arXiv:2006.1262

Experimenting with sequential allocation procedures

In experiments that consider the use of subjects, a crucial part is deciding which treatment to allocate to which subject – in other words, constructing the treatment allocation procedure. In a classical experiment, this treatment allocation procedure often simply constitutes randomly assigning subjects to a number of different treatments. Subsequently, when all outcomes have been observed, the resulting data is used to conduct an analysis that is specified a priori. Practically, however, the subjects often arrive at an experiment one-by-one. This allows the data generating process to be viewed differently: instead of considering the subjects in a batch, intermediate data from previous interactions with other subjects can be used to influence the decisions of the treatment allocation in future interactions. A heavily researched formalization that helps developing strategies for sequentially allocating subjects is the multi-armed bandit problem. In this thesis, several methods are developed to expedite the use of sequential allocation procedures by (social) scientists in field experiments. This is done by building upon the extensive literature of the multi-armed bandit problem. The thesis also introduces and shows many (empirical) examples of the usefulness and applicability of sequential allocation procedures in practice

Homomorphically Encrypted Linear Contextual Bandit

Contextual bandit is a general framework for online learning in sequential decision-making problems that has found application in a large range of domains, including recommendation system, online advertising, clinical trials and many more. A critical aspect of bandit methods is that they require to observe the contexts -- i.e., individual or group-level data -- and the rewards in order to solve the sequential problem. The large deployment in industrial applications has increased interest in methods that preserve the privacy of the users. In this paper, we introduce a privacy-preserving bandit framework based on asymmetric encryption. The bandit algorithm only observes encrypted information (contexts and rewards) and has no ability to decrypt it. Leveraging homomorphic encryption, we show that despite the complexity of the setting, it is possible to learn over encrypted data. We introduce an algorithm that achieves a $\widetilde{O}(d\sqrt{T})$ regret bound in any linear contextual bandit problem, while keeping data encrypted

StreamingBandit : Experimenting with Bandit Policies

A large number of statistical decision problems in the social sciences and beyond can be framed as a (contextual) multi-armed bandit problem. However, it is notoriously hard to develop and evaluate policies that tackle these types of problems, and to use such policies in applied studies. To address this issue, this paper introduces StreamingBandit, a Python web application for developing and testing bandit policies in field studies. StreamingBandit can sequentially select treatments using (online) policies in real time. Once StreamingBandit is implemented in an applied context, different policies can be tested, altered, nested, and compared. StreamingBandit makes it easy to apply a multitude of bandit policies for sequential allocation in field experiments, and allows for the quick development and re-use of novel policies. In this article, we detail the implementation logic of StreamingBandit and provide several examples of its use.Peer reviewe