7 research outputs found

    Stable Secretaries

    Full text link
    We define and study a new variant of the secretary problem. Whereas in the classic setting multiple secretaries compete for a single position, we study the case where the secretaries arrive one at a time and are assigned, in an on-line fashion, to one of multiple positions. Secretaries are ranked according to talent, as in the original formulation, and in addition positions are ranked according to attractiveness. To evaluate an online matching mechanism, we use the notion of blocking pairs from stable matching theory: our goal is to maximize the number of positions (or secretaries) that do not take part in a blocking pair. This is compared with a stable matching in which no blocking pair exists. We consider the case where secretaries arrive randomly, as well as that of an adversarial arrival order, and provide corresponding upper and lower bounds.Comment: Accepted for presentation at the 18th ACM conference on Economics and Computation (EC 2017

    Packing Returning Secretaries

    Full text link
    We study online secretary problems with returns in combinatorial packing domains with nn candidates that arrive sequentially over time in random order. The goal is to accept a feasible packing of candidates of maximum total value. In the first variant, each candidate arrives exactly twice. All 2n2n arrivals occur in random order. We propose a simple 0.5-competitive algorithm that can be combined with arbitrary approximation algorithms for the packing domain, even when the total value of candidates is a subadditive function. For bipartite matching, we obtain an algorithm with competitive ratio at least 0.5721o(1)0.5721 - o(1) for growing nn, and an algorithm with ratio at least 0.54590.5459 for all n1n \ge 1. We extend all algorithms and ratios to k2k \ge 2 arrivals per candidate. In the second variant, there is a pool of undecided candidates. In each round, a random candidate from the pool arrives. Upon arrival a candidate can be either decided (accept/reject) or postponed (returned into the pool). We mainly focus on minimizing the expected number of postponements when computing an optimal solution. An expected number of Θ(nlogn)\Theta(n \log n) is always sufficient. For matroids, we show that the expected number can be reduced to O(rlog(n/r))O(r \log (n/r)), where rn/2r \le n/2 is the minimum of the ranks of matroid and dual matroid. For bipartite matching, we show a bound of O(rlogn)O(r \log n), where rr is the size of the optimum matching. For general packing, we show a lower bound of Ω(nloglogn)\Omega(n \log \log n), even when the size of the optimum is r=Θ(logn)r = \Theta(\log n).Comment: 23 pages, 5 figure

    Incentives in dynamic markets

    Get PDF
    In this thesis, we consider a variety of combinatorial optimization problems within a common theme of uncertainty and selfish behavior. In our first scenario, the input is collected from selfish players. Here, we study extensions of the so-called smoothness framework for mechanisms, a very useful technique for bounding the inefficiency of equilibria, to the cases of varying mechanism availability and participation of risk-averse players. In both of these cases, our main results are general theorems for the class of (lambda,mu)-smooth mechanisms. We show that these mechanisms guarantee at most a (small) constant factor performance loss in the extended settings. In our second scenario, we do not have access to the exact numerical input. Within this context, we explore combinatorial extensions of the well-known secretary problem under the assumption that the incoming elements only reveal their ordinal position within the set of previously arrived elements. We first observe that many existing algorithms for special matroid structures maintain their competitive ratio in the ordinal model. In contrast, we provide a lower bound for algorithms that are oblivious to the matroid structure. Finally, we design new algorithms that obtain constant competitive ratios for a variety of combinatorial problems

    Tight(er) bounds for similarity measures, smoothed approximation and broadcasting

    Get PDF
    In this thesis, we prove upper and lower bounds on the complexity of sequence similarity measures, the approximability of geometric problems on realistic inputs, and the performance of randomized broadcasting protocols. The first part approaches the question why a number of fundamental polynomial-time problems - specifically, Dynamic Time Warping, Longest Common Subsequence (LCS), and the Levenshtein distance - resists decades-long attempts to obtain polynomial improvements over their simple dynamic programming solutions. We prove that any (strongly) subquadratic algorithm for these and related sequence similarity measures would refute the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Focusing particularly on LCS, we determine a tight running time bound (up to lower order factors and conditional on SETH) when the running time is expressed in terms of all input parameters that have been previously exploited in the extensive literature. In the second part, we investigate the approximation performance of the popular 2-Opt heuristic for the Traveling Salesperson Problem using the smoothed analysis paradigm. For the Fréchet distance, we design an improved approximation algorithm for the natural input class of c-packed curves, matching a conditional lower bound. Finally, in the third part we prove tighter performance bounds for processes that disseminate a piece of information, either as quickly as possible (rumor spreading) or as anonymously as possible (cryptogenography).Die vorliegende Dissertation beweist obere und untere Schranken an die Komplexität von Sequenzähnlichkeitsmaßen, an die Approximierbarkeit geometrischer Probleme auf realistischen Eingaben und an die Effektivität randomisierter Kommunikationsprotokolle. Der erste Teil befasst sich mit der Frage, warum für eine Vielzahl fundamentaler Probleme im Polynomialzeitbereich - insbesondere für das Dynamic-Time-Warping, die längste gemeinsame Teilfolge (LCS) und die Levenshtein-Distanz - seit Jahrzehnten keine Algorithmen gefunden werden konnten, die polynomiell schneller sind als ihre einfachen Lösungen mittels dynamischer Programmierung. Wir zeigen, dass ein (im strengen Sinne) subquadratischer Algorithmus für diese und verwandte Ähnlichkeitsmaße die starke Exponentialzeithypothese (SETH) widerlegen würde. Für LCS zeigen wir eine scharfe Schranke an die optimale Laufzeit (unter der SETH und bis auf Faktoren niedrigerer Ordnung) in Abhängigkeit aller bisher untersuchten Eingabeparameter. Im zweiten Teil untersuchen wir die Approximationsgüte der klassischen 2-Opt-Heuristik für das Problem des Handlungsreisenden anhand des Smoothed-Analysis-Paradigmas. Weiterhin entwickeln wir einen verbesserten Approximationsalgorithmus für die Fréchet-Distanz auf einer Klasse natürlicher Eingaben. Der letzte Teil beweist neue Schranken für die Effektivität von Prozessen, die Informationen entweder so schnell wie möglich (Rumor-Spreading) oder so anonym wie möglich (Kryptogenografie) verbreiten

    Secretary Markets with Local Information

    No full text

    Secretary Markets with Local Information

    No full text
    corecore