GRASP: A New Search Algorithm for Satisfiability

This paper introduces GRASP (Generic search Algorithm J3r the Satisfiabilily Problem), an integrated algorithmic J3amework 30r SAT that unifies several previously proposed searchpruning techniques and jcilitates identification of additional ones. GRASP is premised on the inevitability of conflicts during search and its most distinguishingjature is the augmentation of basic backtracking search with a powerful conflict analysis procedure. Analyzing conflicts to determine their causes enables GRASP to backtrack non-chronologically to earlier levels in the search tree, potentially pruning large portions of the search space. In addition, by 'ecording" the causes of conflicts, GRASP can recognize and preempt the occurrence of similar conflicts later on in the search. Einally, straighrward bookkeeping of the causali y chains leading up to conflicts a/lows GRASP to identij) assignments that are necessary jr a solution to be found. Experimental results obtained jom a large number of benchmarks, including many J3om the field of test pattern generation, indicate that application of the proposed conflict analysis techniques to SAT algorithms can be extremely ejctive jr a large number of representative classes of SAT instances

Software redundancy: what, where, how

Software systems have become pervasive in everyday life and are the core component of many crucial activities. An inadequate level of reliability may determine the commercial failure of a software product. Still, despite the commitment and the rigorous verification processes employed by developers, software is deployed with faults. To increase the reliability of software systems, researchers have investigated the use of various form of redundancy. Informally, a software system is redundant when it performs the same functionality through the execution of different elements. Redundancy has been extensively exploited in many software engineering techniques, for example for fault-tolerance and reliability engineering, and in self-adaptive and self- healing programs. Despite the many uses, though, there is no formalization or study of software redundancy to support a proper and effective design of software. Our intuition is that a systematic and formal investigation of software redundancy will lead to more, and more effective uses of redundancy. This thesis develops this intuition and proposes a set of ways to characterize qualitatively as well as quantitatively redundancy. We first formalize the intuitive notion of redundancy whereby two code fragments are considered redundant when they perform the same functionality through different executions. On the basis of this abstract and general notion, we then develop a practical method to obtain a measure of software redundancy. We prove the effectiveness of our measure by showing that it distinguishes between shallow differences, where apparently different code fragments reduce to the same underlying code, and deep code differences, where the algorithmic nature of the computations differs. We also demonstrate that our measure is useful for developers, since it is a good predictor of the effectiveness of techniques that exploit redundancy. Besides formalizing the notion of redundancy, we investigate the pervasiveness of redundancy intrinsically found in modern software systems. Intrinsic redundancy is a form of redundancy that occurs as a by-product of modern design and development practices. We have observed that intrinsic redundancy is indeed present in software systems, and that it can be successfully exploited for good purposes. This thesis proposes a technique to automatically identify equivalent method sequences in software systems to help developers assess the presence of intrinsic redundancy. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the technique by showing that it identifies the majority of equivalent method sequences in a system with good precision and performance

Automating test oracles generation

Software systems play a more and more important role in our everyday life. Many relevant human activities nowadays involve the execution of a piece of software. Software has to be reliable to deliver the expected behavior, and assessing the quality of software is of primary importance to reduce the risk of runtime errors. Software testing is the most common quality assessing technique for software. Testing consists in running the system under test on a finite set of inputs, and checking the correctness of the results. Thoroughly testing a software system is expensive and requires a lot of manual work to define test inputs (stimuli used to trigger different software behaviors) and test oracles (the decision procedures checking the correctness of the results). Researchers have addressed the cost of testing by proposing techniques to automatically generate test inputs. While the generation of test inputs is well supported, there is no way to generate cost-effective test oracles: Existing techniques to produce test oracles are either too expensive to be applied in practice, or produce oracles with limited effectiveness that can only identify blatant failures like system crashes. Our intuition is that cost-effective test oracles can be generated using information produced as a byproduct of the normal development activities. The goal of this thesis is to create test oracles that can detect faults leading to semantic and non-trivial errors, and that are characterized by a reasonable generation cost. We propose two ways to generate test oracles, one derives oracles from the software redundancy and the other from the natural language comments that document the source code of software systems. We present a technique that exploits redundant sequences of method calls encoding the software redundancy to automatically generate test oracles named CCOracles. We describe how CCOracles are automatically generated, deployed, and executed. We prove the effectiveness of CCOracles by measuring their fault-finding effectiveness when combined with both automatically generated and hand-written test inputs. We also present Toradocu, a technique that derives executable specifications from Javadoc comments of Java constructors and methods. From such specifications, Toradocu generates test oracles that are then deployed into existing test suites to assess the outputs of given test inputs. We empirically evaluate Toradocu, showing that Toradocu accurately translates Javadoc comments into procedure specifications. We also show that Toradocu oracles effectively identify semantic faults in the SUT. CCOracles and Toradocu oracles stem from independent information sources and are complementary in the sense that they check different aspects of the system undertest

An overview of decision table literature 1982-1995.

This report gives an overview of the literature on decision tables over the past 15 years. As much as possible, for each reference, an author supplied abstract, a number of keywords and a classification are provided. In some cases own comments are added. The purpose of these comments is to show where, how and why decision tables are used. The literature is classified according to application area, theoretical versus practical character, year of publication, country or origin (not necessarily country of publication) and the language of the document. After a description of the scope of the interview, classification results and the classification by topic are presented. The main body of the paper is the ordered list of publications with abstract, classification and comments.