Graph Scaling Cut with L1-Norm for Classification of Hyperspectral Images

In this paper, we propose an L1 normalized graph based dimensionality reduction method for Hyperspectral images, called as L1-Scaling Cut (L1-SC). The underlying idea of this method is to generate the optimal projection matrix by retaining the original distribution of the data. Though L2-norm is generally preferred for computation, it is sensitive to noise and outliers. However, L1-norm is robust to them. Therefore, we obtain the optimal projection matrix by maximizing the ratio of between-class dispersion to within-class dispersion using L1-norm. Furthermore, an iterative algorithm is described to solve the optimization problem. The experimental results of the HSI classification confirm the effectiveness of the proposed L1-SC method on both noisy and noiseless data.Comment: European Signal Processing Conference 201

Studies on dimension reduction and feature spaces :

Today's world produces and stores huge amounts of data, which calls for methods that can tackle both growing sizes and growing dimensionalities of data sets. Dimension reduction aims at answering the challenges posed by the latter. Many dimension reduction methods consist of a metric transformation part followed by optimization of a cost function. Several classes of cost functions have been developed and studied, while metrics have received less attention. We promote the view that metrics should be lifted to a more independent role in dimension reduction research. The subject of this work is the interaction of metrics with dimension reduction. The work is built on a series of studies on current topics in dimension reduction and neural network research. Neural networks are used both as a tool and as a target for dimension reduction. When the results of modeling or clustering are represented as a metric, they can be studied using dimension reduction, or they can be used to introduce new properties into a dimension reduction method. We give two examples of such use: visualizing results of hierarchical clustering, and creating supervised variants of existing dimension reduction methods by using a metric that is built on the feature space of a neural network. Combining clustering with dimension reduction results in a novel way for creating space-efficient visualizations, that tell both about hierarchical structure and about distances of clusters. We study feature spaces used in a recently developed neural network architecture called extreme learning machine. We give a novel interpretation for such neural networks, and recognize the need to parameterize extreme learning machines with the variance of network weights. This has practical implications for use of extreme learning machines, since the current practice emphasizes the role of hidden units and ignores the variance. A current trend in the research of deep neural networks is to use cost functions from dimension reduction methods to train the network for supervised dimension reduction. We show that equally good results can be obtained by training a bottlenecked neural network for classification or regression, which is faster than using a dimension reduction cost. We demonstrate that, contrary to the current belief, using sparse distance matrices for creating fast dimension reduction methods is feasible, if a proper balance between short-distance and long-distance entries in the sparse matrix is maintained. This observation opens up a promising research direction, with possibility to use modern dimension reduction methods on much larger data sets than which are manageable today

Interpretable Clustering using Unsupervised Binary Trees

We herein introduce a new method of interpretable clustering that uses unsupervised binary trees. It is a three-stage procedure, the first stage of which entails a series of recursive binary splits to reduce the heterogeneity of the data within the new subsamples. During the second stage (pruning), consideration is given to whether adjacent nodes can be aggregated. Finally, during the third stage (joining), similar clusters are joined together, even if they do not descend from the same node originally. Consistency results are obtained, and the procedure is used on simulated and real data sets.Comment: 25 pages, 6 figure