2,360 research outputs found
On Relation between Constraint Answer Set Programming and Satisfiability Modulo Theories
Constraint answer set programming is a promising research direction that
integrates answer set programming with constraint processing. It is often
informally related to the field of satisfiability modulo theories. Yet, the
exact formal link is obscured as the terminology and concepts used in these two
research areas differ. In this paper, we connect these two research areas by
uncovering the precise formal relation between them. We believe that this work
will booster the cross-fertilization of the theoretical foundations and the
existing solving methods in both areas. As a step in this direction we provide
a translation from constraint answer set programs with integer linear
constraints to satisfiability modulo linear integer arithmetic that paves the
way to utilizing modern satisfiability modulo theories solvers for computing
answer sets of constraint answer set programs.Comment: Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
(TPLP
A Satisfiability Modulo Theory Approach to Secure State Reconstruction in Differentially Flat Systems Under Sensor Attacks
We address the problem of estimating the state of a differentially flat
system from measurements that may be corrupted by an adversarial attack. In
cyber-physical systems, malicious attacks can directly compromise the system's
sensors or manipulate the communication between sensors and controllers. We
consider attacks that only corrupt a subset of sensor measurements. We show
that the possibility of reconstructing the state under such attacks is
characterized by a suitable generalization of the notion of s-sparse
observability, previously introduced by some of the authors in the linear case.
We also extend our previous work on the use of Satisfiability Modulo Theory
solvers to estimate the state under sensor attacks to the context of
differentially flat systems. The effectiveness of our approach is illustrated
on the problem of controlling a quadrotor under sensor attacks.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1412.432
Language-based Abstractions for Dynamical Systems
Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are the primary means to modelling
dynamical systems in many natural and engineering sciences. The number of
equations required to describe a system with high heterogeneity limits our
capability of effectively performing analyses. This has motivated a large body
of research, across many disciplines, into abstraction techniques that provide
smaller ODE systems while preserving the original dynamics in some appropriate
sense. In this paper we give an overview of a recently proposed
computer-science perspective to this problem, where ODE reduction is recast to
finding an appropriate equivalence relation over ODE variables, akin to
classical models of computation based on labelled transition systems.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2017, arXiv:1707.0366
Optimization Modulo Theories with Linear Rational Costs
In the contexts of automated reasoning (AR) and formal verification (FV),
important decision problems are effectively encoded into Satisfiability Modulo
Theories (SMT). In the last decade efficient SMT solvers have been developed
for several theories of practical interest (e.g., linear arithmetic, arrays,
bit-vectors). Surprisingly, little work has been done to extend SMT to deal
with optimization problems; in particular, we are not aware of any previous
work on SMT solvers able to produce solutions which minimize cost functions
over arithmetical variables. This is unfortunate, since some problems of
interest require this functionality.
In the work described in this paper we start filling this gap. We present and
discuss two general procedures for leveraging SMT to handle the minimization of
linear rational cost functions, combining SMT with standard minimization
techniques. We have implemented the procedures within the MathSAT SMT solver.
Due to the absence of competitors in the AR, FV and SMT domains, we have
experimentally evaluated our implementation against state-of-the-art tools for
the domain of linear generalized disjunctive programming (LGDP), which is
closest in spirit to our domain, on sets of problems which have been previously
proposed as benchmarks for the latter tools. The results show that our tool is
very competitive with, and often outperforms, these tools on these problems,
clearly demonstrating the potential of the approach.Comment: Submitted on january 2014 to ACM Transactions on Computational Logic,
currently under revision. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1202.140
- …