1,241 research outputs found

    Tight Bound for Sum of Heterogeneous Random Variables: Application to Chance Constrained Programming

    Full text link
    We study a tight Bennett-type concentration inequality for sums of heterogeneous and independent variables, defined as a one-dimensional minimization. We show that this refinement, which outperforms the standard known bounds, remains computationally tractable: we develop a polynomial-time algorithm to compute confidence bounds, proved to terminate with an epsilon-solution. From the proposed inequality, we deduce tight distributionally robust bounds to Chance-Constrained Programming problems. To illustrate the efficiency of our approach, we consider two use cases. First, we study the chance-constrained binary knapsack problem and highlight the efficiency of our cutting-plane approach by obtaining stronger solution than classical inequalities (such as Chebyshev-Cantelli or Hoeffding). Second, we deal with the Support Vector Machine problem, where the convex conservative approximation we obtain improves the robustness of the separation hyperplane, while staying computationally tractable

    Stochastic graph partitioning: quadratic versus SOCP formulations

    Get PDF
    International audienceWe consider a variant of the graph partitioning problem involving knapsack constraints with Gaussian random coefficients. In this new variant, under this assumption of probability distribution, the problem can be traditionally formulated as a binary SOCP for which the continuous relaxation is convex. In this paper, we reformulate the problem as a binary quadratic constrained program for which the continuous relaxation is not necessarily convex. We propose several linearization techniques for latter: the classical linearization proposed by Fortet (Trabajos de Estadistica 11(2):111โ€“118, 1960) and the linearization proposed by Sherali and Smith (Optim Lett 1(1):33โ€“47, 2007). In addition to the basic implementation of the latter, we propose an improvement which includes, in the computation, constraints coming from the SOCP formulation. Numerical results show that an improvement of Sheraliโ€“Smithโ€™s linearization outperforms largely the binary SOCP program and the classical linearization when investigated in a branch-and-bound approach

    ํ™•๋ฅ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™” ์กฐํ•ฉ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•ด๋ฒ•

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ,2019. 8. ์ด๊ฒฝ์‹.In this thesis, we consider a variant of the deterministic combinatorial optimization problem (DCO) where there is uncertainty in the data, the probability maximizing combinatorial optimization problem (PCO). PCO is the problem of maximizing the probability of satisfying the capacity constraint, while guaranteeing the total profit of the selected subset is at least a given value. PCO is closely related to the chance-constrained combinatorial optimization problem (CCO), which is of the form that the objective function and the constraint function of PCO is switched. It search for a subset that maximizes the total profit while guaranteeing the probability of satisfying the capacity constraint is at least a given threshold. Thus, we discuss the relation between the two problems and analyse the complexities of the problems in special cases. In addition, we generate pseudo polynomial time exact algorithms of PCO and CCO that use an exact algorithm of a deterministic constrained combinatorial optimization problem. Further, we propose an approximation scheme of PCO that is fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) in some special cases that are NP-hard. An approximation scheme of CCO is also presented which was derived in the process of generating the approximation scheme of PCO.๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ(deterministic combinatorial optimization problem : DCO)์—์„œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ๋ถˆํ™•์‹ค์„ฑ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•  ๋•Œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ, ์ด ์ˆ˜์ต์„ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ์ƒ์ˆ˜ ์ด์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ ์ œ์•ฝ์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ฌ ํ™•๋ฅ ์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ  ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™” ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ(probability maximizing combinatorial optimization problem : PCO)์„ ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. PCO์™€ ๋งค์šฐ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ, ์ด ์ˆ˜์ต์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ ์ œ์•ฝ์„ ๋งŒ์กฑ์‹œํ‚ฌ ํ™•๋ฅ ์ด ์ผ์ • ๊ฐ’ ์ด์ƒ์ด ๋˜๋„๋ก ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•๋ฅ  ์ œ์•ฝ ์กฐํ•ฉ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ(chance-constrained combinatorial optimization problem : CCO)๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๋‘ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•˜๊ณ  ํŠน์ • ์กฐ๊ฑด ํ•˜์—์„œ ๋‘ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๋ณต์žก๋„๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ œ์•ฝ์‹์ด ํ•˜๋‚˜ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋œ DCO๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ’€์–ด PCO์™€ CCO์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ•ด๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ์œ ์‚ฌ ๋‹คํ•ญ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋” ๋‚˜์•„๊ฐ€, PCO๊ฐ€ NP-hard์ธ ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ์ธ์Šคํ„ด์Šค๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์™„์ „ ๋‹คํ•ญ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•ด๋ฒ•(FPTAS)๊ฐ€ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•ด๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•ด๋ฒ•์„ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ CCO์˜ ๊ทผ์‚ฌํ•ด๋ฒ• ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Problem Description 1 1.2 Literature Review 7 1.3 Research Motivation and Contribution 12 1.4 Organization of the Thesis 13 Chapter 2 Computational Complexity of Probability Maximizing Combinatorial Optimization Problem 15 2.1 Complexity of General Case of PCO and CCO 18 2.2 Complexity of CCO in Special Cases 19 2.3 Complexity of PCO in Special Cases 27 Chapter 3 Exact Algorithms 33 3.1 Exact Algorithm of PCO 34 3.2 Exact Algorithm of CCO 38 Chapter 4 Approximation Scheme for Probability Maximizing Combinatorial Optimization Problem 43 4.1 Bisection Procedure of rho 46 4.2 Approximation Scheme of CCO 51 4.3 Variation of the Bisection Procedure of rho 64 4.4 Comparison to the Approximation Scheme of Nikolova 73 Chapter 5 Conclusion 77 5.1 Concluding Remarks 77 5.2 Future Works 79 Bibliography 81 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 87Maste
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore