385 research outputs found
Solving Common-Payoff Games with Approximate Policy Iteration
For artificially intelligent learning systems to have widespread
applicability in real-world settings, it is important that they be able to
operate decentrally. Unfortunately, decentralized control is difficult --
computing even an epsilon-optimal joint policy is a NEXP complete problem.
Nevertheless, a recently rediscovered insight -- that a team of agents can
coordinate via common knowledge -- has given rise to algorithms capable of
finding optimal joint policies in small common-payoff games. The Bayesian
action decoder (BAD) leverages this insight and deep reinforcement learning to
scale to games as large as two-player Hanabi. However, the approximations it
uses to do so prevent it from discovering optimal joint policies even in games
small enough to brute force optimal solutions. This work proposes CAPI, a novel
algorithm which, like BAD, combines common knowledge with deep reinforcement
learning. However, unlike BAD, CAPI prioritizes the propensity to discover
optimal joint policies over scalability. While this choice precludes CAPI from
scaling to games as large as Hanabi, empirical results demonstrate that, on the
games to which CAPI does scale, it is capable of discovering optimal joint
policies even when other modern multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms
are unable to do so. Code is available at https://github.com/ssokota/capi .Comment: AAAI 202
From social machines to social protocols:Software engineering foundations for sociotechnical systems
The overarching vision of social machines is to facilitate social processes by having computers provide administrative support. We conceive of a social machine as a sociotechnical system (STS): a software-supported system in which autonomous principals such as humans and organizations interact to exchange information and services. Existing approaches for social machines emphasize the technical aspects and inadequately support the meanings of social processes, leaving them informally realized in human interactions. We posit that a fundamental rethinking is needed to incorporate accountability, essential for addressing the openness of the Web and the autonomy of its principals. We introduce Interaction-Oriented Software Engineering (IOSE) as a paradigm expressly suited to capturing the social basis of STSs. Motivated by promoting openness and autonomy, IOSE focuses not on implementation but on social protocols, specifying how social relationships, characterizing the accountability of the concerned parties, progress as they interact. Motivated by providing computational support, IOSE adopts the accountability representation to capture the meaning of a social machine’s states and transitions. We demonstrate IOSE via examples drawn from healthcare. We reinterpret the classical software engineering (SE) principles for the STS setting and show how IOSE is better suited than traditional software engineering for supporting social processes. The contribution of this paper is a new paradigm for STSs, evaluated via conceptual analysis
- …