A Parallel Hardware Architecture For Quantum Annealing Algorithm Acceleration

Quantum Annealing (QA) is an emerging technique, derived from Simulated Annealing, providing metaheuristics for multivariable optimisation problems. Studies have shown that it can be applied to solve NP-hard problems with faster convergence and better quality of result than other traditional heuristics, with potential applications in a variety of fields, from transport logistics to circuit synthesis and optimisation. In this paper, we present a hardware architecture implementing a QA-based solver for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem, designed to improve the performance of the algorithm by exploiting parallelised computation. We synthesised the architecture using as a target an Altera FPGA board and simulated the execution for solving a set of benchmarks available in the literature. Simulation results show that the proposed implementation is about 100 times faster than a single-thread general-purpose CPU without impact on the accuracy of the solution

Restricting the search space to boost Quantum Annealing performance

International audienceWe are interested in Quantum Annealing (QA), an algorithm inspired by quantum theory and Simulated Annealing (SA). It is based on quantum replicas, which explore an energy surface, and are less prone to be trapped in local minima. Moreover, kinetic energy helps replicas to find a global minimum.This method has proved its efficiency for several optimization problems. We start this study by presenting the application of QA to a new problem: the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MKP). We then present a new idea to speed up the quantum annealing process by detecting the resemblance between replicas. If many of the replicas exhibit the same properties, our assumption is that these properties will also be present with a high probability in a global solution. Consequently, the QA may restrict certain mutations in order to preserve those similarities. We call this algorithm Restrictive Quantum Annealing (RQA).We establish that RQA has better performances than QA and SA by carrying out an adequate analysis of the RQA performance, taking the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the above-mentioned MKP as references. We also advance guidelines indicating types of NP-hard problems for which our algorithm is particularly well adapted