5 research outputs found
Proof Theory at Work: Complexity Analysis of Term Rewrite Systems
This thesis is concerned with investigations into the "complexity of term
rewriting systems". Moreover the majority of the presented work deals with the
"automation" of such a complexity analysis. The aim of this introduction is to
present the main ideas in an easily accessible fashion to make the result
presented accessible to the general public. Necessarily some technical points
are stated in an over-simplified way.Comment: Cumulative Habilitation Thesis, submitted to the University of
Innsbruc
Multiply-Recursive Upper Bounds with Higman's Lemma
We develop a new analysis for the length of controlled bad sequences in
well-quasi-orderings based on Higman's Lemma. This leads to tight
multiply-recursive upper bounds that readily apply to several verification
algorithms for well-structured systems
The Hydra Battle and Cichon’s Principle
Abstract In rewriting the Hydra battle refers to a term rewrite system H proposed by Dershowitz and Jouannaud. To date, H withstands any attempt to prove its termination automatically. This motivates our interest in term rewrite systems encoding the Hydra battle, as a careful study of such systems may prove useful in the design of automatic termination tools. Moreover it has been an open problem, whether any termination order compatible with H has to have the Howard-Bachmann ordinal as its order type, i.e., the proof theoretic ordinal of the theory of one inductive denition. We answer this question in the negative, by providing a reduction order compatible with H, whose order type is at most 0 , the proof theoretic ordinal of Peano arithmetic
The Derivational Complexity Induced by the Dependency Pair Method
We study the derivational complexity induced by the dependency pair method,
enhanced with standard refinements. We obtain upper bounds on the derivational
complexity induced by the dependency pair method in terms of the derivational
complexity of the base techniques employed. In particular we show that the
derivational complexity induced by the dependency pair method based on some
direct technique, possibly refined by argument filtering, the usable rules
criterion, or dependency graphs, is primitive recursive in the derivational
complexity induced by the direct method. This implies that the derivational
complexity induced by a standard application of the dependency pair method
based on traditional termination orders like KBO, LPO, and MPO is exactly the
same as if those orders were applied as the only termination technique