164 research outputs found

    Comparing optimal convergence rate of stochastic mesh and least squares method for Bermudan option pricing

    Get PDF
    We analyze the stochastic mesh method (SMM) as well as the least squares method (LSM) commonly used for pricing Bermudan options using the standard two phase methodology. For both the methods, we determine the decay rate of mean square error of the estimator as a function of the computational budget allocated to the two phases and ascertain the order of the optimal allocation in these phases. We conclude that with increasing computational budget, while SMM estimator converges at a slower rate compared to LSM estimator, it converges to the true option value whereas LSM estimator, with fixed number of basis functions, usually converges to a biased value

    On the rates of convergence of simulation based optimization algorithms for optimal stopping problems

    Get PDF
    In this paper we study simulation based optimization algorithms for solving discrete time optimal stopping problems. This type of algorithms became popular among practioneers working in the area of quantitative finance. Using large deviation theory for the increments of empirical processes, we derive optimal convergence rates and show that they can not be improved in general. The rates derived provide a guide to the choice of the number of simulated paths needed in optimization step, which is crucial for the good performance of any simulation based optimization algorithm. Finally, we present a numerical example of solving optimal stopping problem arising in option pricing that illustrates our theoretical findings

    Pricing path-dependent Bermudan options using Wiener chaos expansion: an embarrassingly parallel approach

    Full text link
    In this work, we propose a new policy iteration algorithm for pricing Bermudan options when the payoff process cannot be written as a function of a lifted Markov process. Our approach is based on a modification of the well-known Longstaff Schwartz algorithm, in which we basically replace the standard least square regression by a Wiener chaos expansion. Not only does it allow us to deal with a non Markovian setting, but it also breaks the bottleneck induced by the least square regression as the coefficients of the chaos expansion are given by scalar products on the L^2 space and can therefore be approximated by independent Monte Carlo computations. This key feature enables us to provide an embarrassingly parallel algorithm.Comment: The Journal of Computational Finance, Incisive Media, In pres

    Number of paths versus number of basis functions in American option pricing

    Full text link
    An American option grants the holder the right to select the time at which to exercise the option, so pricing an American option entails solving an optimal stopping problem. Difficulties in applying standard numerical methods to complex pricing problems have motivated the development of techniques that combine Monte Carlo simulation with dynamic programming. One class of methods approximates the option value at each time using a linear combination of basis functions, and combines Monte Carlo with backward induction to estimate optimal coefficients in each approximation. We analyze the convergence of such a method as both the number of basis functions and the number of simulated paths increase. We get explicit results when the basis functions are polynomials and the underlying process is either Brownian motion or geometric Brownian motion. We show that the number of paths required for worst-case convergence grows exponentially in the degree of the approximating polynomials in the case of Brownian motion and faster in the case of geometric Brownian motion.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/105051604000000846 in the Annals of Applied Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aap/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    The least squares method for option pricing revisited

    Full text link
    It is shown that the the popular least squares method of option pricing converges even under very general assumptions. This substantially increases the freedom of creating different implementations of the method, with varying levels of computational complexity and flexible approach to regression. It is also argued that in many practical applications even modest non-linear extensions of standard regression may produce satisfactory results. This claim is illustrated with examples
    corecore