15,566 research outputs found
The Structure of First-Order Causality
Game semantics describe the interactive behavior of proofs by interpreting
formulas as games on which proofs induce strategies. Such a semantics is
introduced here for capturing dependencies induced by quantifications in
first-order propositional logic. One of the main difficulties that has to be
faced during the elaboration of this kind of semantics is to characterize
definable strategies, that is strategies which actually behave like a proof.
This is usually done by restricting the model to strategies satisfying subtle
combinatorial conditions, whose preservation under composition is often
difficult to show. Here, we present an original methodology to achieve this
task, which requires to combine advanced tools from game semantics, rewriting
theory and categorical algebra. We introduce a diagrammatic presentation of the
monoidal category of definable strategies of our model, by the means of
generators and relations: those strategies can be generated from a finite set
of atomic strategies and the equality between strategies admits a finite
axiomatization, this equational structure corresponding to a polarized
variation of the notion of bialgebra. This work thus bridges algebra and
denotational semantics in order to reveal the structure of dependencies induced
by first-order quantifiers, and lays the foundations for a mechanized analysis
of causality in programming languages
Smart matching
One of the most annoying aspects in the formalization of mathematics is the
need of transforming notions to match a given, existing result. This kind of
transformations, often based on a conspicuous background knowledge in the given
scientific domain (mostly expressed in the form of equalities or isomorphisms),
are usually implicit in the mathematical discourse, and it would be highly
desirable to obtain a similar behavior in interactive provers. The paper
describes the superposition-based implementation of this feature inside the
Matita interactive theorem prover, focusing in particular on the so called
smart application tactic, supporting smart matching between a goal and a given
result.Comment: To appear in The 9th International Conference on Mathematical
Knowledge Management: MKM 201
Type classes for efficient exact real arithmetic in Coq
Floating point operations are fast, but require continuous effort on the part
of the user in order to ensure that the results are correct. This burden can be
shifted away from the user by providing a library of exact analysis in which
the computer handles the error estimates. Previously, we [Krebbers/Spitters
2011] provided a fast implementation of the exact real numbers in the Coq proof
assistant. Our implementation improved on an earlier implementation by O'Connor
by using type classes to describe an abstract specification of the underlying
dense set from which the real numbers are built. In particular, we used dyadic
rationals built from Coq's machine integers to obtain a 100 times speed up of
the basic operations already. This article is a substantially expanded version
of [Krebbers/Spitters 2011] in which the implementation is extended in the
various ways. First, we implement and verify the sine and cosine function.
Secondly, we create an additional implementation of the dense set based on
Coq's fast rational numbers. Thirdly, we extend the hierarchy to capture order
on undecidable structures, while it was limited to decidable structures before.
This hierarchy, based on type classes, allows us to share theory on the
naturals, integers, rationals, dyadics, and reals in a convenient way. Finally,
we obtain another dramatic speed-up by avoiding evaluation of termination
proofs at runtime.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1105.275
Nominal Abstraction
Recursive relational specifications are commonly used to describe the
computational structure of formal systems. Recent research in proof theory has
identified two features that facilitate direct, logic-based reasoning about
such descriptions: the interpretation of atomic judgments through recursive
definitions and an encoding of binding constructs via generic judgments.
However, logics encompassing these two features do not currently allow for the
definition of relations that embody dynamic aspects related to binding, a
capability needed in many reasoning tasks. We propose a new relation between
terms called nominal abstraction as a means for overcoming this deficiency. We
incorporate nominal abstraction into a rich logic also including definitions,
generic quantification, induction, and co-induction that we then prove to be
consistent. We present examples to show that this logic can provide elegant
treatments of binding contexts that appear in many proofs, such as those
establishing properties of typing calculi and of arbitrarily cascading
substitutions that play a role in reducibility arguments.Comment: To appear in the Journal of Information and Computatio
- …